User:Emmaaitelli/User:Emmaaitelli/Dime Store Cowgirl/Bellsam4 Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? Emmaaitelli
• Link to draft you're reviewing: Dime Store Cowgirl

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes.
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes introductory sentence is very clear and easy to understand.
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? There could maybe been more of a quick description about what the article's major sections are.
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is clear and concise but not with too much detail. It is well done.

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes all content is very relevant and interesting.
• Is the content added up-to-date? All content is up-to-date.
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Nothing that does not belong and not much more content I could think to add.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral? Yes all content is neutral.
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No positions are heavily biased.
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No the new content does not persuade.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, the sources provided make sense for the topic of the article. Meaning even if they aren't journal articles, it makes sense to cite interviews because this is a song by a celebrity in which case interviews are great ways to gather information.
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes sources are thorough.
• Are the sources current? Yes all sources are current and relevant.
• Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes wide variety of types of authors and sources of articles, interviews, etc.
• Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes all content is very clear and concise and adds SO much to the article in terms of understanding where the article comes from and what it really means.
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes the sections help break up the information in an orderly fashion.

Overall impressions

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes there has been tremendous amounts of content added that only further drives understanding of this song.
• What are the strengths of the content added? I would say the strengths are the amount of quality content that has been added to this article. By culitvating a variety of new/current sources there has been much more explanation on what the lyrics mean within this song.
• How can the content added be improved? When adding the live performances sections, I would assume she has performed this song live more than what was said. I have no idea if that is true or not but maybe adding to that section could help level it out, like festivals she has been apart of and so on.

Overall evaluation:

Overall, I think the addition content that has been sourced and added is amazing. There is plenty more information that helps add to this conversation of Kacey's song and where it originates from. I was very impressed with all the addition information provided and think that you are doing amazing with your edits. Really cool to see where it started and where the article is going. Nice work!