User:Renamed user 10940912412349/AFD Archive1

Deleted AFDs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already speedily deleted by The Wordsmith. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:23, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Liar & A Thief[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It doesn't seems to meet WP:NM. Endofskull (talk) 23:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy delete A9: An article about a musical recording that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant and where the artist's article does not exist. Top Jim (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Aztnara[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This animal seems to be non-existent. I've looked for sources, and I haven't found any. I looked for some images, but still none at all. So this seems to be a hoax, but I'm not quite sure. Endofskull (talk) 23:55, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Delete The most charitable explanation is that this is a word for a bird species in another language. Like the nominator, I can't find ANY sources, reliable or unreliable. Article created by a newly registered user, and it's that person's only contribution. Cullen328 (talk) 06:24, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Delete as unverifiable. -- Whpq (talk) 17:21, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Kept, merged, redirected, etc. AFDs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Hesarooyeh[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems unencyclopedic. It also seems to not be adhering from a neutral point of view, such as "his well researched book titled: The History and the Culture of Shahr-e-Babak". Endofskull (talk) 01:21, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Keep Verifiable human settlement, per WP:OUTCOMES. AfD is not cleanup. POV issues can be resolved through the normal editing process. Numerous hits on the Persian spelling (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL). Incidentally, the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency gives the spelling as Ḩeşārū’īyeh [1]. (call) 05:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Keep Verifiable settlements are considered notable. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 10:44, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Keep - needs improvement, not deletion. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:11, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Keep per CaliforniaAliBaba and per AWP:Energy conservation. °°Playmobilonhishorse (talk) 02:26, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Keep per above. Actual settlement. NPOV is not a reason for deletion, but for improvement. The article could just say "Hesarooyeh sucks" and I'd still vote "keep," and obviously improve.--Oakshade (talk) 06:11, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.