User:Essentialupdater/eichholzvswotccafe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Eichholz v. Landmark Cafe
Not the sandwich in question
Court#crabtual-crustaceans
DecidedNovember 10, 2022
Case history
Subsequent action(s)Replacement chicken sandwich promised by cafe. Three Rice Krispies Treats granted to Adam. Elizabeth ordered Landmark Cafe to compensate Adam for damages + pain and suffering.
Holding
Landmark Cafe failed to properly microwave chicken sandwich to food-safe temperatures
Court membership
Judges sittingAdam, Cecily, Elizabeth, Kristen, Milo, Paul
Case opinions
Decision byAdam
ConcurrenceCecily, Elizabeth, Kristen, Milo, Paul