User:Fungus Guy/Archive1

Sault Ste. Marie

Hi there...just a quick comment about your Sault Ste. Marie-related edits. As you can probably imagine, there are separate articles for Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario and Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan. Because of that, Sault Ste. Marie without the state or province specified is just a disambiguation page.

So could you please make sure, when you're including a link to one of the Saults in an article, to specifically link to Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario or Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan (whichever applies) rather than just "Sault Ste. Marie"? If you don't want the province or state name to appear in the text, you can pipe it like this: [[Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario|Sault Ste. Marie]]. Thanks. Bearcat 08:24, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

Alphabetical order, or order by number of votes?

Hi Sup, thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been changing the order in which the results are presented from the current standard in a bunch of articles. I don't think that this is an improvement. I've started a discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Electoral districts in Canada/Election results to find out what other people think. I think it would be a good idea to develop a consensus approach among editors before making any more changes of this sort. Please join the discussion. Thanks, Ground Zero | t 13:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Hello again. The consensus was pretty clear in favour of keeping the order by number of votes approach, so I've changed the tables back. I do like your idea of using italics to denote incumbents, and have kept that in. I'm sorry that your work on this particular issue turned out to be in vain, but I hope that you continue contributing to Wikipedia. Regards, Ground Zero | t 17:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Flora of Canada

Hi Super cyclist - that's going to be one huge page when finished! Couple of grammatic points; first, the ligatures æ and œ are not used in scientific names, they are actually prohibited by the ICBN, see ICBN Article 60.6 "the ligatures -æ- and -œ-, indicating that the letters are pronounced together, are to be replaced by the separate letters -ae- and -oe-" (so I've removed them from the list); and second, the standard abbreviation for subspecies is subsp. (not ssp.). I've also taken out one or two introduced species (e.g. Ohio Buckeye is native only in the US) and added a few you'd missed - MPF 11:42, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the note; it seems the sources I'd used for Aesculus glabra are wrong (mainly because of too-small-scale maps, I suspect, but also e.g. [1], [2]), so I'll add it back in (and also add Ontario on the Ohio Buckeye page). On subdividing the page, either alphabetically, or (compare e.g. List of the vascular plants of Britain and Ireland) by taxonomic order. Whatever you think easiest. On ligatures, that may well be why the ICBN decided to exclude them (they aren't too easy on UK or European keyboards either!); even diaresis is optional and rarely used (Isoetes is far more often used in print than Isoëtes). I don't have a lot of info on non-woody Canadian flora (I'm more into woody plants), but here's a link that might be useful for the west coast: E-Flora BC - MPF 21:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the same articles, please note that the correct procedure for applying categories is to apply only Category:Flora of Canada — that category is already a subcategory of Category:Canada, Category:Flora by country and Category:Flora, and Wikipedia has rules against filing articles simultaneously in both parent categories and subcategories of the same parent. Thanks. Bearcat 21:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Aesculus glabra

Hi Chris - thanks for the note. Hard to know; I got the impression from reading it that its native presence in Ontario might be a recent discovery. Maybe go to the site and ask the rangers (if there are any!) for the evidence. On the flora list, it's looking good; couple of suggestions to make it look neater, one maybe put the links on the scientific names rather than the common names, second, use uniform capitalisation for the common names (either all capitalised [my preference], or none); the current mix doesn't look tidy; and last, the threatened tags could do with some punctuation between the names and the tag - MPF 22:02, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Drosera rotundifolia

Hi Chris, The page so far is already a big improvement! I added a few more details and rearranged some sections (mostly in an effort to get the images to correlate, but I'm not sure if I was entirely successful). I removed your image: Image:Drosera_rotundifolia_rotundifolia_bunch,_Black_Fen.jpg, due to the fact that I have doubts as to the accuracy of the identification of this plant. As far as I can tell, the lamina is not nearly rotund enough to be Drosera rotundifolia, and as it is also too wide to be D. anglica, my best guess is D. intermedia. I think the location of your photograph falls within the range shown here. Your thoughts? Feel free to continue messing with the page, moving/deleting/adding pictures and text. Sorry if my changes disrupted what your admirable effort! --NoahElhardt 22:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi again - Looked in on here; I'm afraid the map is inaccurate in places (not your fault, the fault of the source!), I'll maybe have a go at re-drawing it in a day or two. Specifically, the UK distribution is badly off; it is fairly common and widespread in the northwest, but decidedly rare and very scattered in the southeast. I'd like to know how they devised the map; I strongly suspect it depends on the sources they used, with published distribution maps (e.g. Jalas & Suominen Atlas Florae Europaeae) for the well-botanised areas of western Europe and eastern North America, and then point herbarium specimen collection sites (the dots) for the rest of the range. Thus the map probably more reflects botanical mapping input than actual abundance of the plant, and it might be better not to distinguish between the red and pink. Any thoughts? - MPF 22:19, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Happiness Map.JPG

Hello, great map & article! However it would be much better if you saved this image in png format and re-uploaded it. Simply jpg format is not very suited for maps, graphs, and other images where large areas are colored in one color. You can see some examples and read more here. Renata 15:57, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

A barnstar

The Working Man's Barnstar For your extensive and painstaking work on Canadian riding articles to improve election results tables, and for not giving up when your first edits were not accepted by other editors. Ground Zero

Ridings templates

Great job with the Quebec regional riding templates. I like the improvement. Do you think you could do something similar for Ontario, where I've already created Template:Ridings in Ontario? —Cuiviénen 02:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Changing scientific names..............

I noticed your shroom list - there are more bluelinks all teh time but a few have changed their names..

cheers Cas Liber 05:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Re:Canadian ridings

Not a problem at all; you did all the work of making the maps! Mutual cyber high-five, or something. —Cuiviénen 14:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Riding infobox

Wow, good work on the infobox. Just one favour to ask. Would it be possible for you to add municipal wards to the box? It would only be used for a few ridings, so it would need an "if" pramater, which I dont think I understand on how to add. -- Earl Andrew - talk 22:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The problem is, Wards aren't the same as neighbourhoods. I'll have to check to see if anyone understands the if parameters. -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:18, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Pancake Bay Regional Map.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Pancake Bay Regional Map.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 17:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Happy Planet map

The map is great, I just wonder if you could add (preferably as an inset/legend) an explanation of the order of colors from highest to lowest (green-blue-purple-yellow-orange-red, with grey N/A, right?), or how it corresponds with the numbers. Rigadoun (talk) 17:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Cephalization

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cephalization, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! (jarbarf) 00:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Your subpages

Are you tagging all of those subpages for deletion? Because I can cut out the middle man and just delete them all for you right now if you want, without you placing the speedy tag on each one. Save you some time. Kafziel ^Talk 13:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I am deleting many, but not all, of the subpages. A little spring cleaning, if you will :) FUNgus guy 13:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Okie dokie. Well, I'll just follow behind you for a while then. Kafziel ^Talk 13:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Matt_Mays_-_When_The_Angels_Make_Contact.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Matt_Mays_-_When_The_Angels_Make_Contact.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 11:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Steve_Butland.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Steve_Butland.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 19:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Guelph,_Ontario_Mayor_Kate_Quarrie.jpg

I have tagged Image:Guelph,_Ontario_Mayor_Kate_Quarrie.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast 16:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Scouting in Nunavut

Can you help render "Be Prepared", the Scout Motto, into Inuktitut syllabics? Thanks! Chris 21:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Not sure if this will help, but "prepare" is ᐅᐸᓗᖓᐃᖅᓴᑐᖅ. FUNgus guy 12:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Ridings in Greater Toronto

I was considering splitting this template into three - specifically, Ridings in Toronto, Ridings in South Durham and York, and Ridings in Brampton, Mississauga and Oakville - but as you created the original template I thought I'd ask your opinion. What do you think? Morgan695 00:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

If you think it would better organize ridings, go for it. FUNgus guy 22:19, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Algoma Steel, Inc Logo.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Algoma Steel, Inc Logo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

U1

Is there a section of articles you would like to delete? It would save you some time, I think.   jj137 ^♠ 03:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Satisfaction with Life Index

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Satisfaction with Life Index, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Satisfaction with Life Index

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Satisfaction with Life Index, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Satisfaction with Life Index

An editor has nominated Satisfaction with Life Index, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satisfaction with Life Index and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Algoma District School Board logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Algoma District School Board logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Averatec Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Averatec Logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Red List Albania

Template:Red List Albania has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 19:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Page moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. --Tombstone (talk) 15:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

• I have had to go through all of your contributions and found you have done this routinely. I have tried to fix your cut&paste moves and listed those below:
  • Bawean deer→Bawean Deer
  • Microgale jenkinsae→Jenkins' Shrew Tenrec
  • Sonoran pronghorn→Sonoran Pronghorn
  • Ader's Duiker→Aders' Duiker
• You will need to check that all of your cut&paste moves are fixed. Any that I have missed you will need to tag with {{db-histmerge|NAME OF PAGE THE ARTICLE WAS CUT FROM}}.--Tombstone (talk) 15:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

New Zealand grayling

Fish names are lower case, so why was this fish article name moved to upper case? GrahamBould (talk) 22:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

IUCN conservation status

Please utilize and update the {{IUCN2008}} template when updating the conservation status on articles. Thanks! - UtherSRG (talk) 20:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Ontario subdivisions.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ontario subdivisions.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

File:SSM-LkSup.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SSM-LkSup.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of sister cities in Canada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Twin city

List of sister cities in Michigan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Twin city

Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Twin city

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Twin city

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of historic places in Kingston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Art Gallery of Algoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Morin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bas-Richelieu--Nicolet--Bécancour.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Berthier--Maskinongé riding.PNG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Calgary (39th Parl).png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Central Ontario (39th Parl).png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:11, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 21 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Template:Ontario provincial election, 2014/Ajax—Pickering page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Election results — Calculating "Swing"

Hi Super
I noticed you added the figures for Swing to the 2011 election results in the Parry Sound—Muskoka (provincial electoral district) article.  I've seen swing figures in several of the election result tables and I've been wondering how it's calculated.  Would you please share the source or formula you're using to arrive at these figures so that I can consider adding them to other tables as I'm working with them.  Thanks  — Who R you? Talk 05:28, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
P.S. FYI, there are {{CANelec/hold}} and {{CANelec/gain}} (Canadian election result/hold & …/gain) if those would make life any easier for you.

Thanks, those templates will surely help! For Parry Sound, swing was (Δ1+Δ2)/2, rise of one party plus the fall of the other over 2. I'm not sure how to calculate swing when there's more than 2 parties in play (e.g. when the 3rd-place party wins an election), but I've been showing swing for the winning party over their greatest rival. FUNgus guy (talk) 17:15, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Should be (x+-y)/2 actually. -- Earl Andrew - talk 17:19, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Silly me, I forgot the negative. Thanks. (Δ1 + -Δ2) / 2 FUNgus guy (talk) 18:00, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks (to you both).  You might also care to comment on Calculation of Swing as well as Election results in politician articles.  Cheers  — Who R you? Talk 18:21, 3 June 2014 (UTC) (And you're most welcome for the mention of those templates)

There's also the {{CANelec/nothold}} for notional holds. (Never got around to doing one for gains). This would be used for swings calculated from redistributed results or when calculated from two different predecessor parties (eg Canadian Alliance + Progressive Conservative). -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Election results templates — “Total rejected ballots” vs “Total rejected, unmarked and declined ballots”

Hi Super (Gus, fun guy! )
I'm not sure we should be changing the "Total rejected ballots" line in the election results tables to "Total rejected, unmarked and declined ballots".  It certainly is more accurate, summarizing the figures actually summed from the election official results; the problem is, at this point we're talking about updating perhaps thousands of templates, not to mention all the articles where election results aren't in templates but are hardcoded separately into each article.  I appreciate the desire for more accuracy and greater correctness, something vital when updating these tables that often have minor number transpositions, math errors, or earlier unofficial results; but maybe that one line is better left alone.  If the day ever comes to change it, it's probably a process best left to a bot that looks at ever call to {{CANelec/total}} or {{Canadian election result/total}}.  I also wouldn't worry too much about going through changing Canadian election result calls to CANelec calls; that's fine when we're creating new ones, but no reason to go back and edit them for it (it's actually one more step since the CANelec's are just redirects to the Canadian election result's, not that that matters either way).  As for adding Swing figures, my only concern would be if consensus on the talk page about it is to do something different than what you're doing now; just wouldn't want to create a duplication of efforts; although I suspect what you're adding for Swing will match what the consensus finally is.  The only reason I brought up getting consensus on the issue of Swing at all was so that I could add the formula to the …/hold & …/gain template documentations and do/verify the calculations when I'm updating other templates.  Cheers  — Who R you? Talk 00:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

WP User names

Thought I'd point out this link is case you're interested: WP:RENAME  Cheers — Who R you? Talk 04:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

New MPPs

Hello, I see you started updating the MPPs in many of the riding articles. However, I think we are supposed to wait until they are sworn in when the legislature starts to put them officially as MPPs. For the moment, it is still not official, not until Election Ontario releases the detailled results and that they get sworn in by the lieutenant governor. Votre pseudonyme ici (talk) 04:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

I feel that is covered by the {{current}} template, and the preliminary results bar on the 2014 results table. I did try, however, to add addenda to the MPPs in the infobox, but it didn't work out as planned. Maybe you are able to add a "preliminary results" tag, or something of the sort, to the infobox MPPs? FUNgus guy (talk) 04:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

How about we revert back in the infobox to what the MPP was before the election (just because it is still the official one, according to the law), but we fill in the results in the Election results section? Vous voyez ce que je veux dire? :) Votre pseudonyme ici (talk) 04:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

D'accord, je vous comprends. FUNgus guy (talk) 05:14, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abralia similis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tongo

Abronia anzuetoi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diurnal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you Super cyclist for your new articles on the two pulmonate limpets! Very much appreciated. Invertzoo (talk) 19:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Forgive me if I have already offered you this invitation:

I've noticed your edits on pages relating to Gastropods; perhaps you'd be interested in joining WikiProject Gastropods? If you would like more information, please visit the project page or the project talk page.

A kitten for you!

Thanks for the new freshwater snail articles!

Invertzoo (talk) 19:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Garypinidae

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Garypinidae, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.museum.wa.gov.au/catalogues/pseudoscorpions/family/garypinidae.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:22, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Branch coral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cook Island

Damascus bream (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Extirpation

Yarkon bream (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Afek

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Anapistula

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Anapistula, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.factualworld.com/article/List_of_Symphytognathidae_species.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angraecum subulatum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raphia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Macleod (electoral district), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicine Hat (electoral district). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 00:52, 8 August 2014 (UTC)