User:Ikip/Disclaimer

Welcome to my user page. Because of editors who have wished to silence me, I find it necessary to make a couple of important points about my block history:

Inclusionist (talk · message · contribs · global contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · user creation · block user · block log · count · total · logs · summary · email | lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · spi · socks | rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp | current rights · rights log (local) · rights log (global/meta) | rights · renames · blocks · protects · deletions · rollback · admin · logs | UHx · AfD · UtHx · UtE)

First, I have asked several administrators repeatedly to voluntarily boot me indefinitely. The majority of the blocks are this.

Second, my real blocks are now over two years old. Historically, blocks these old have been easily explained away.^[1]

Third, the unwritten rule that corrupt admins have created is this: Since I am a veteran, "established" editor, with over 25,000 edits, I am "special". To get me indefinitely blocked, you have to create an arbcom, an incredibly time consuming, emotional process, which means your edit history and behavior will be scrutinized with a fine tooth comb also.^[2]

If you disagree with my point of view, I am probably only trying to retain something on wikipedia which you are probably attempting to delete. Please, why not find sources which support your view instead? Inclusionist (talk) 01:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Notes[edit]

^ Many of these old blocks were done by controversial editors, some of who have been desopyed and were pushed out of wikipedia in disgrace for their argumentative behavior and abuse of administrative powers. I have no qualms about questioning any editor, no matter how powerful, and this has gotten me in a lot of trouble.
^ If you choose the arbitration route: I have been in several arbcoms going up against some of the most powerful admins on wikipedia. Because of my incredibly unpopular views, I have spent three years edit warring. To survive, I have learned obscure acronyms (rules) and now how to manipulate corrupt wikipedia bureaucracy the same way hypocritical admins too. I also have a law degree. And despite alienating nearly every group I have came in contact with, I am still here.

[1] Many of these old blocks were done by controversial editors, some of who have been desopyed and were pushed out of wikipedia in disgrace for their argumentative behavior and abuse of administrative powers. I have no qualms about questioning any editor, no matter how powerful, and this has gotten me in a lot of trouble.

[2] If you choose the arbitration route: I have been in several arbcoms going up against some of the most powerful admins on wikipedia. Because of my incredibly unpopular views, I have spent three years edit warring. To survive, I have learned obscure acronyms (rules) and now how to manipulate corrupt wikipedia bureaucracy the same way hypocritical admins too. I also have a law degree. And despite alienating nearly every group I have came in contact with, I am still here.

[1]

[2]