User:ImprovedWikiImprovment/The nature of Wikipedia
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This user page or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this user page has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This page was last edited by ImprovedWikiImprovment (talk | contribs) 5 years ago. (Update timer) |
This essay is about the nature of Wikipedia. So what is the nature of Wikipedia? Whatever you, or rather the community, make it to be. There are many things and planes the community uses to decide what Wikipedia is and isn't.
Guidelines[edit]
These are things that have general consensus and are therefore a general standard. The best example is probably the manual of style. Of course, these can be changed; they’re no more concrete than any main article. So, guidelines aren’t what Wikipedia is, despite what editors will tell you.
==