User:Islander/labs

This is part of a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Islander/labs.

Lego Template Design

My attempt at a colour scheme for the Lego template:

Signature Experimenting

TheIslander
TheIslander
_TheIslander
_TheIslander
_TheIslander
TheIslander
TheIslander
TheIslander
TheIslander

Linking

_TheIslander

Possible Usurption

• _TheIslander 17:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• _TalkIslander 17:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• _TheIslander
• _TalkIslander
• Islander_Talk
• And the winner is...
• _TalkIslander

What happened to TheIslander? When joining Wikipedia, I wished to use the allias that I use everywhere else on the Internet, 'Islander'. However, this username was already taken. After having been active for a number of months, I decided it was time to usurp the previous editor who registered the 'Islander' account but never used it, and I have now adopted this new name, and a slightly modified signature to suit. In the hope of avoiding any confusion, I shall leave this notice up for a few months. Think of it as a new Corporate Identity :P ! TalkIslander

Table Experiments

Series 1	Series 2	Series 3	Series 4	Series 5
Duncan Bannatyne
Peter Jones
Simon Woodroffe	Theo Paphitis
Doug Richard		Deborah Meaden
Rachel Elnaugh		Richard Farleigh		James Caan

Userpage Development

Main article: /Userpage

Speight

Body found at Paddington Station Please note that as of now (17:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)), the body found at Paddington Station, though believed to be Speight, has not been formally identified. For this reason, and so as not to violate Biographies of Living Persons, this article cannot state that Speight is dead. When it is confirmed, the information can be added, but not beforehand. Thank you for understanding.

Use of Flags in Television Infoboxes

We are trying to guage a final consensus as to whether flag icons should or should not be used in television infoboxes. Please go HERE, and voice your support/opposition/neutrality. Thank you. _TalkIslander 14:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

==Use of Flags in [[Template:Infobox Television|Television Infoboxes]]==
We are trying to guage a final consensus as to whether flag icons should or should not be used in television infoboxes. If you have a view on this, please go [[Template talk:Infobox Television#Proposal: Flags should no longer be used in Television Infoboxes, per WP:FLAG|HERE]], and voice your support/opposition/neutrality. Thank you. ~~~~

Contestants and eliminations

The following table (containing the contestants along with their mentors) shows the scores obtained each episode by each contestant, along with those who were eliminated (red), and those who came second to last, just escaping elimination (yellow):

Contestant	Episode
	1 (no scoring)	2 (out of 40)	3 (out of 40)	4 (out of 40)	5 - first round (out of 80)	5 - second round (public vote)
Sue Perkins (TV & radio presenter, actress and writer) Mentor: Jason Lai	-	35	33	32	67	Winner
Goldie (Electronic music artist, DJ and actor) Mentor: Ivor Setterfield	-	28	35	27	73	Runner-up
Jane Asher (Actress) Mentor: Christopher Warren-Green	-	24	25	29	64
Katie Derham (TV & radio presenter) Mentor: Matthew Rowe	-	26	30	29
Alex James (Blur bassist) Mentor: Brad Cohen	-	25	24	23
Bradley Walsh (Comedian and actor) Mentor: Sarah Tenant-Flowers	-	17	23
David Soul (Actor) Mentor: Natalia Luis-Bassa	-	22
Peter Snow (TV & radio presenter) Mentor: Peter Stark	-

British Criminals

Something needs to be done about this category, and in all honesty, I don't know what - the standard delete/rename/merge solutions may not be suitable in this case. As it stands right now, one could add, any British citizen who, say, had once stolen a bar of chocolate and been caught. They do, after all, have a criminal record. However, I feel that this would seriously violate WP:UNDUE - if you place a person in this category, you effectively place a label at the bottom of their page calling them a British criminal, which though may in the very strictest sense be true, is far too heavily weighted. In turn this violation of WP:UNDUE would clearly constitute a violation of WP:BLP, one of our most important policies.

Now, I have an actual example of this problem, which lead me to start this TFC: Danny John-Jules. Recently, John-Jules was found guilty of two counts of battery, and sentanced to 120 hours of community service. This clearly should be (and is) mentioned in the article, fully referenced. However, anonomous IPs are insistant that this British Criminal category be placed on his article. John-Jules is not notable for this one criminal offence, he is notable as an actor, specifically as Cat from Red Dwarf, and as such I feel that effectivley adding a 'British Criminal' lable to the bottom of his article is a gross violation of WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE. Now if, as I suspect was it's original intention, this category was used on an article for, say, the parents of Baby P, then that would be completely fair - that is all they are mainly known for. In John-Jules' case, however, this template is not appropriate.

Like I said, it's not immediately obvious to me what should be done, only that something does need to be done, but at least two options seem open to me: 1) we delete the category (less desirable), or 2) we place stricter guides on the category as to which articles can acceptably be 'branded' with it (in which case all current members of the category would need 'vetting', to ensure that they qualify), or 3) we rename the category to something more along the lines of "Established British criminals". With that in mind, what are people's thoughts? ~~~~

Collapsed

Test
The following content has been placed in a collapse box for improved usability.
Something needs to be done about this category, and in all honesty, I don't know what - the standard delete/rename/merge solutions may not be suitable in this case. As it stands right now, one could add, any British citizen who, say, had once stolen a bar of chocolate and been caught. They do, after all, have a criminal record. However, I feel that this would seriously violate WP:UNDUE - if you place a person in this category, you effectively place a label at the bottom of their page calling them a British criminal, which though may in the very strictest sense be true, is far too heavily weighted. In turn this violation of WP:UNDUE would clearly constitute a violation of WP:BLP, one of our most important policies. Now, I have an actual example of this problem, which lead me to start this TFC: Danny John-Jules. Recently, John-Jules was found guilty of two counts of battery, and sentanced to 120 hours of community service. This clearly should be (and is) mentioned in the article, fully referenced. However, anonomous IPs are insistant that this British Criminal category be placed on his article. John-Jules is not notable for this one criminal offence, he is notable as an actor, specifically as Cat from Red Dwarf, and as such I feel that effectivley adding a 'British Criminal' lable to the bottom of his article is a gross violation of WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE. Now if, as I suspect was it's original intention, this category was used on an article for, say, the parents of Baby P, then that would be completely fair - that is all they are mainly known for. In John-Jules' case, however, this template is not appropriate. Like I said, it's not immediately obvious to me what should be done, only that something does need to be done, but at least two options seem open to me: 1) we delete the category (less desirable), or 2) we place stricter guides on the category as to which articles can acceptably be 'branded' with it (in which case all current members of the category would need 'vetting', to ensure that they qualify), or 3) we rename the category to something more along the lines of "Established British criminals". With that in mind, what are people's thoughts? ~~~~
The above is an extended discussion that has been collapsed for improved usability.