User:Jh12/WPSchoolTest2
{{WikiProject Schools|class=Stub|importance=Low|needs-infobox=yes|info=Please add references for this article ([[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] and [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]]). For ideas on expansion, see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines]]. Good luck, --~~~~}}
|
This article is related to the WikiProject Schools. This Project is an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. | |
| Current Collaborations: | Greenwich High School - New Albany High School (Indiana) - St. Mary's High School (Calgary) - St Albans School (Hertfordshire) - Wesley College, Melbourne - Pope John Paul II Catholic Secondary School - Mundelein High School | |
|---|---|---|
* Add Template:WPSchools to Category:WikiProject_banners * New Page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Assessment * New Categories: Category:FA-Class school articles Category:A-Class school articles Category:GA-Class school articles Category:B-Class school articles Category:Start-Class school articles Category:Stub-Class school articles Category:Disambig-Class school articles Category:Template-Class school articles Category:Category-Class school articles Category:Unassessed school articles Category:WikiProject Schools articles needing infoboxes
Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Schools! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's School articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
If you have just rated an article, please leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPSchools}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories.
Frequently asked questions[edit]
- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Schools WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions[edit]
An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WPSchools}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WPSchools
|class=
|importance=
}}
Quality scale[edit]
This category contains film articles graded according to the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale. If you would like to help grade them, please visit Assessment requests.
Note: You should not assign any article GA or FA grades arbitrarily. These grades must pass through official Wikipedia channels and undergo a Peer Review process.
Importance scale[edit]
School related articles are rated on this importance scale. Importance must be regarded as a relative term. If importance values are applied within this project, these only reflect the perceived importance to this project and to the work groups the School falls under. An article judged to be "Top-Class" in one context may be only "Mid-Class" in another project. The criteria used for rating article priority are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it).
Assessment requests[edit]
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new quality rating for it, please feel free to list it below. NOTE: This is only to rate the article on quality - you may or may not get feedback on the article. If you assess an article, please strike it off using <s>Strike-through text</s> so that other editors will not waste time going there too. Thanks!
Add requests to the bottom of this list.
Assessment summaries[edit]
Leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Article grading[edit]
School articles are graded for quality based on this scale and for importance using the Release Version Criteria scale. For further information, visit the Assessment department.