Article is clear throughout the beginning, but towards the end it explains the cost of a maternal/neonatal infant stays and I don't think that was necessary to include.
The article stays unbiased throughout,only states the facts of neonatology and does not state any opinions
All of the links in the article work and the source does support the claims made in the article
All facts are cited and come from neutral, factual sources
When talking about the mean hospital costs of the average stay of an infant or mother, the data is from 2012 and has probably increased in the last 6 years
I think the article should've included the training that neonatologist have to go through after they are out of school and the research aspect of neonatology.
The talk page isn't very active at all on this article
This article overall achieves the rhetorical objective and does a good job of informing the reader
