User:KeybladeSephi/archives/04

User:KeybladeSephi/talk table

Use of KeybladeSephi's talk page

1. Please use your personal signature
2. If a requested topic is not present, please make another topic.
3. No vandalism!

Fair use, yet again

Keyblade, over and over again I've had to remove fair use images from your userpage [1][2][3][4]. I've done so yet again today [5]. This is really quite simple. Fair use images are copyrighted. They are not available under a free license. You can NOT use non-free license imagery on your userpage. Today in particular, I removed Image:NewLink.png which is clearly marked as a fair use image. Yet, you added it anyways. Why? Why??? I also removed Image:Metaknight.png, which you claim you have full rights to and release rights. Yet, the image is blatantly a derivative of the source of Image:Mknight.jpg. Your version is a copyright violation and needs to be deleted. The image Image:Marth.jpg is also blatantly a screenshot, and you do not retain rights to it. It too needs to be deleted as a copyright violation. The image Image:Roy (Fire Emblem).png is blatantly a derivative copy of Image:Royfire.jpg and thus also a copyright violation? Why are you doing this? Why are you intentionally copying copyrighted works and attempting to claim them as yours? This must stop. If you keep it up, I'll recommend a block. --Durin 16:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

I have to agree with Durin. Browsing through your image uploads, I see quite a few that you claim to have created, but are quite clearly either official logos, or pictures you found on other sites:

• Image:Wasatch Logo.jpg
• Image:Gonyaulax catenella.jpg
• Image:Remains of Wasatch Fire.JPG
• Image:MIT.png
• Image:MIT Seal.png

"Creating a picture" does not mean saving the file to your hard drive under a new name, cropping it, re-drawing it yourself in a image editing program, etc. If the image has a copyright, no creation of yours that resembles it can be freely distributed. Now, some of these can be tagged with the appropriate licensing information because they are valid for fair use, but others cannot. I would like you to look at them and give us your thoughts. We can help you understand the issue if you talk about it. Leebo ^T/C 19:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

It seems you respond to other users' concerns. Would you be so kindly as to respond to mine? Leebo ^T/C 02:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Hola...

:) Hey, Keyblade.

User talk:66.214.84.186

Thanks for addressing his/her removal of warnings so swiftly, KebladeSephi. --Qwerty (talk) 16:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Your signature violates WP:SIG

Specifically, the length guidelines. Please shorten the amount of code: your sig takes up a ridiculous amount of space in the edit window. Thank you. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 17:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Is this better?: KeybladeSephi ^{(Talk) (Contributions) (Autograph)} 18:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

That's still 5 lines of code in the edit window. Please cut it down to a maximum of 3. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 18:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

How about this?: KeybladeSephi ^(Talk) _{(Contributions)} 19:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Your Revert to Clash Of The Sky Galleons

Mind if you explain your purpose of doing that? I thought it's better to be wikified and i did, but instead, you reverted my every edits back to the original un-wikified version. Do correct me if I'm in wrong. — Yurei-eggtart^talk 17:03, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, it was probably my sister; I don't think that that was her intention KeybladeSephi ^{(Talk) (Contributions) (Autograph)} 17:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh ok, no problem :) — Yurei-eggtart^talk 06:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Warnings

Could you please stop giving everyone who vandalizes final warnings, even if they did it twenty minutes ago and were already warned? -Amarkov moore cowbell! 17:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and you shouldn't be saying that you'll block people permanently for vandalizing your talk page. It won't happen. -Amarkov moore cowbell! 17:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandal revert on RuneScape gods

Just to let you know, I've reverted your vandal revert on this page. Rory096 (talk • contribs) beat you to it and it went back to a bad version. Thanks, CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 18:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that; my computer's lagging today and it said that it hasn't been reverted :P KeybladeSephi ^{(Talk) (Contributions) (Autograph)} 18:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 14	2 April 2007	About the Signpost

Poll finds people think Wikipedia "somewhat reliable"	Wikipedia biographical errors attract more attention
Association of Members' Advocates nominated for deletion	Reference desk work leads to New York Times correction
WikiWorld comic: "Charles Lane"	News and notes: Alexa, Version 0.5, attribution poll
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

MWA HA HA Ha Ha HA!!!

I have claimed your place on the Wikipediaholic Top 20 list, but for some strange reason, I can't see the Wikitable where I add my name in the edit window. My score was a 25693.57629029926!!! Well, anyway, MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!  ~Steptrip 16:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)