User:KodyForinger/Government speech and First amendment
There were several arguments for why the supreme court case could have violated the First Amendment. The argument used in defense of the government not violating the First Amendment and staying neutral was the coined "government speech" [1] The argument that when the government decided to not fund planned parenthood which engaged in abortions it was participating in "government speech" which means it was speaking on its own behalf and simply holding the views of those who elected them, not regulating private speech.[1]
 | This is a user sandbox of KodyForinger. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
References[edit]
- ^ a b Lim, Lilia. "Four-factor disaster: courts should abandon the circuit test for distinguishing government speech from private speech." Washington Law Review, vol. 83, no. 4, 2008, p. 569+. Academic OneFile, http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A193791403/AONE?u=mcc_pv&sid=AONE&xid=03b45e00. Accessed 24 Oct. 2018.