User:Krator/Sandbox3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the recent Arbitration Committee case, a "broader disagreement regarding the interpretation of notability guidelines with reference to fictional and popular culture topics"i was identified. This essay aims to be a guide to debates that are part of this broader disagreement, by identifying arguments to be avoided and questions to be considered. This is in no way a replacement for WP:Notability (fiction). Rather, it aims to take a different approach to

Premises[edit]

  1. Notability is not inherited.
  2. Notability is indefensible/Harmlessness is not an argument
  3. Harmlessness is not an argument.
  4. Discussion is warranted for each case.

Three questions[edit]

Rephrase!

  1. If this topic were optimally covered in Wikipedia, would the length of that coverage warrant an article of its own?


Structure this broader disagreement.

Premises: