Jump to content

User:Kvvirginialee/Evaluate an Article

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Charles Rufus Brown[edit]

  • Name of article: Charles Rufus Brown
  • I searched through the academic discipline category and chose "biblical studies." I am very interested in biblical studies myself, and I was curious to see what scholars were listed. I did not recognize any names, but I chose Charles Rufus Brown at random to learn about him.

Lead[edit]

Lead evaluation[edit]

There is an introductory sentence, but it is not detailed. The contents are included, but the short introduction is so brief that readers do not learn much about Charles Rufus Brown.

Content[edit]

Content evaluation[edit]

There is not much content to evaluate, but the content that is present is relevant to Charles Rufus Brown. The content is somewhat up to date. However, the article has not been improved upon in depth. There are no notes in the notes section. There is hardly any background information.

Tone and Balance[edit]

Tone and balance evaluation[edit]

The article is neutral and without biased. However, the facts are few. The sentences that are listed do not try to persuade readers.

Sources and References[edit]

Sources and references evaluation[edit]

There are some links that should be included and are not included. The links listed do work. The writer gave attribution, but it is unclear where their information is from.

Organization[edit]

Organization evaluation[edit]

There is not enough information to conclude if it is well-written. It is brief but clear in many ways. The facts are easy to read. The organization and structure is good, but there is not much content within them.

Images and Media[edit]

Images and media evaluation[edit]

There no images.

Checking the talk page[edit]

Talk page evaluation[edit]

No conversations. It is agreed that this article needs help, though. It is a part of WikiProjects, and help is encouraged.

Overall impressions[edit]

Overall evaluation[edit]

It is a stub and of low-importance on the project's importance scale. The article has potential, but research must be done so that Charles Rufus Brown has more information and facts in his article. Research and adding on details and density will improve the underdeveloped article.

Optional activity[edit]

  • Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~

I asked the question: What was Charles Rufus Brown's childhood like?