User:LP-mn/Sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

= Testing the NOTE feature[edit]

Xxxx XxxCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). Xx X

Notes[edit]

How Firm a Foundation (novel)[edit]

How Firm a Foundation
File:How Firm a Foundation by David Weber.png
Cover of How Firm a Foundation.
AuthorDavid Weber
Cover artistStephen Youll
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
GenreScience Fiction
PublisherTor Books[1]
Publication date
September 13, 2011
Media typePrint (Hardback) 6 1/8 x 9-1/4 inches
Pages608
ISBN978-0-7653-2154-1
OCLC999999999
Preceded byA Mighty Fortress 
Followed by( unknown ) 

How Firm a Foundation is the fifth book in the Safehold science fiction novel series by David Weber and published by Tor Books on September 13, 2011. "Snippets" or selected chapter previews are currently available at David Weber's Official web page, prior to the release date.

Plot[edit]

"Blurb" quoted from the Macmillan web site[1][edit]

The Charisian Empire, born in war, has always known it must fight for its very survival. What most of its subjects don’t know even now, however, is how much more it’s fighting for. Emperor Cayleb, Empress Sharleyan, Merlin Athrawes, and their innermost circle of most trusted advisers do know. And because they do, they know the penalty if they lose will be far worse than their own deaths and the destruction of all they know and love.

For five years, Charis has survived all the Church of God Awaiting and the corrupt men who control it have thrown at the island empire. The price has been high and paid in blood. Despite its chain of hard-fought naval victories, Charis is still on the defensive. It can hold its own at sea, but if it is to survive, it must defeat the Church upon its own ground. Yet how does it invade the mainland and take the war to a foe whose population outnumbers its own fifteen to one? How does it prevent that massive opponent from rebuilding its fleets and attacking yet again?

Charis has no answer to those questions, but needs to find one…quickly. The Inquisition’s brutal torture and hideous executions are claiming more and more innocent lives. Its agents are fomenting rebellion against the only mainland realms sympathetic to Charis. Religious terrorists have been dispatched to wreak havoc against the Empire’s subjects. Assassins stalk the Emperor and Empress, their allies and advisers, and an innocent young boy, not yet eleven years old, whose father has already been murdered. And Merlin Athrawes, the cybernetic avatar of a young woman a thousand years dead, has finally learned what sleeps beneath the far-off Temple in the Church of God Awaiting’s city of Zion.

The men and women fighting for human freedom and tolerance have built a foundation for their struggle in the Empire of Charis with their own blood, but will that foundation be firm enough to survive?

Audiobook (Book on CD)[edit]

Publisher: Macmillan Audio; Unabridged edition (September 13, 2011); ISBN 1427212392; ISBN 978-1427212399

References[edit]

Category:2011 novels Category:Novels by David Weber Category:American science fiction novels Category:21st-century American novels

References (for Honorverse)[edit]

Main Honor Harrington series
HH0 Ms. Midshipwoman Harrington*1* HH7 In Enemy Hands
HH1 On Basilisk Station HH8 Echoes of Honor
HH2 The Honor of the Queen HH9 Ashes of Victory
HH3 The Short Victorious War HH10 War of Honor
HH4 Field of Dishonor HH11 At All Costs
HH5 Flag in Exile HH12 Mission of Honor*2*
(expected 2009 or 2010)
HH6 Honor Among Enemies HH13 ___
Spin off Series
Wages of Sin Saganami Island series
WS1 Crown of Slaves SI1 The Shadow of Saganami
WS2 _Crown_of_Slaves_2_*3*
(future book, title unknown)
SI2 Storm from the Shadows
(due March 2009)
WS3 ___ SI3 _Storm_from_the_Shadows_2_
(future book, title unknown)*4*
Anthologies
HHA1 More Than Honor HHA2 Worlds of Honor
HHA3 Changer of Worlds HHA4 Service of the Sword

*1* Short story in the anthology The Warmasters (multi-author multi-universe collection) republished in Changer of Worlds.
*2* Title (and little else) referred to by the Author (David Weber) in his 4-page An Authorial Note.[1]
*3* and *4* FFI, see the FIRST and LAST sentence in Author's May 15, 2008 quote.

*



NFL[edit]

Division Team City/Area Size of Metro Area Stadium Founded Joined Head Coach
American Football Conference
East Buffalo Bills Orchard Park, NY 47 Ralph Wilson Stadium 1 1959 1970 Dick Jauron
Miami Dolphins Miami Gardens, FL 7 Land Shark Stadium 1966 1970 Tony Sparano
New England Patriots Foxborough, MA 10/37/65/75/126/193/192/292 Gillette Stadium 1959 1970 Bill Belichick
New York Jets East Rutherford, NJ 1 Giants Stadium 2 1960 1970 Rex Ryan
North Baltimore Ravens Baltimore, MD 20/9/303 M&T Bank Stadium 1996 3 John Harbaugh
Cincinnati Bengals Cincinnati, OH 24 Paul Brown Stadium 1968 1970 Marvin Lewis
Cleveland Browns Cleveland, OH 26/72 Cleveland Browns Stadium 1946 1950 3 Eric Mangini
Pittsburgh Steelers Pittsburgh, PA 22 Heinz Field 1933 Mike Tomlin
South Houston Texans Houston, TX 6 Reliant Stadium 2002 Gary Kubiak
Indianapolis Colts * Indianapolis, IN 33/289/359 Lucas Oil Stadium 1953 Jim Caldwell
Jacksonville Jaguars Jacksonville, FL 40/203/232 Jacksonville Municipal Stadium 1995 Jack Del Rio
Tennessee Titans * Nashville, TN 38 LP Field 1960 1970 Jeff Fisher
West Denver Broncos Denver, CO 21/157/177 Invesco Field at Mile High 1960 1970 Josh McDaniels
Kansas City Chiefs * Kansas City, MO 29 Arrowhead Stadium 4 1960 1970 Todd Haley
Oakland Raiders * Oakland, CA 31 Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum 1960 1970 Tom Cable
San Diego Chargers * San Diego, CA 17 Qualcomm Stadium 1960 1970 Norv Turner
National Football Conference
East Dallas Cowboys Arlington, TX 4/306 Cowboys Stadium 1960 Wade Phillips
New York Giants East Rutherford, NJ 1 Giants Stadium 2 1925 Tom Coughlin
Philadelphia Eagles Philadelphia, PA 5/125/249 Lincoln Financial Field 1933 Andy Reid
Washington Redskins * Landover, MD 9/20/303 FedExField 1932 Jim Zorn
North Chicago Bears * Chicago, IL 3/321/325 Soldier Field 1919 1920 Lovie Smith
Detroit Lions * Detroit, MI 11/111/143/254 Ford Field 1929 1930 Jim Schwartz
Green Bay Packers Green Bay, WI 153 Lambeau Field 1919 1921 Mike McCarthy
Minnesota Vikings Minneapolis, MN 16 Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome 5 1961 Brad Childress
South Atlanta Falcons Atlanta, GA 8/220 Georgia Dome 1966 Mike Smith
Carolina Panthers Charlotte, NC 34 Bank of America Stadium 1995 John Fox
New Orleans Saints New Orleans, LA 46 Louisiana Superdome 1967 Sean Payton
Tampa Bay Buccaneers Tampa, FL 19 Raymond James Stadium 1976 Raheem Morris
West Arizona Cardinals * Glendale, AZ 12/52 University of Phoenix Stadium 1898 1920 Ken Whisenhunt
St. Louis Rams * St. Louis, MO 18 Edward Jones Dome 1936 1937 Steve Spagnuolo
San Francisco 49ers San Francisco, CA 31 Candlestick Park 1946 1950 Mike Singletary
Seattle Seahawks Seattle, WA 15 Qwest Field 1976 Jim L. Mora

Hammond Stadium (spring training)[edit]

The Field Dimensions[2] compared to Target Field are:

Left Field    9 feet shorter    330' vrs. 339'
Left-Center    _ feet shorter    ___' vrs. 377'
Deep Left-Center    _ feet shorter    ___' vrs. 411'
Center Field    2 feet shorter    405' vrs. 403'
Right-Center    _ feet shorter    ___' vrs. 365'
Right Field    2 feet longer    330' vrs. 328'

Comparison to Metrodome and Hammond Stadium[edit]

Target Field H.H. Humphrey
Metrodome
Hammond
Stadium
Seats 39,504 46,564*
Lower Deck Seats 20,000 21,621
Private Suites 53 115**
Group Party Suites 12 1
Club Level Seats 3,000 not applicable
Upper Deck Seats 13,468 28,779
Disabled Seating 820 190
Lower/Club Seats
between 1st and 3rd Base
about 12,037 6,679
Outfield Seats about 6,748 18,594
Seats with Obstructed Views < 200 1,392
Main Concourse 40 feet (12 m),
open to field
22 feet (6.7 m),
closed to field
Total Restrooms 34 16
Left Field 339' _ 330"
Left-Center 377' _ _
Deep Left-Center 411' _ _
Center Field 403" _ 405'
Right-Center 365' _ _
Right Field 328' _ 330'
*6,000 seats were covered by a curtain; these and others made the stadium expandable to 55,883 during baseball playoffs and certain games in the last homestand and one-game playoff in October 2009.
**Controlled by the Minnesota Vikings football team.
  1. ^ http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/SS.EMS/DavidWeber.pdf
  2. ^ Information derived from each Stadium's Article's InfoBox.

.

External Media Example[edit]

External image
image icon THIS EXAMPLE, is an image of the older hardcover-reprint's artwork that better represents Honor Harrington, but not her uniform or Nimitz, her Treecat.

David Weber has stated[1] that he views the Cover art from OBS as being most faithful to the image of Honor Harrington, but NOT her uniform or of Nimitz, her tree cat. The edition of OBS that is for sale now includes new cover art. It's safe to presume that Weber's comment was in reference to the original version, as is most often now seen on the hardcover re-print. .

References (for External Media Example)[edit]

'A Rising Thunder' - David Weber next mainline Honorverse book[edit]

Mission of Honor
AuthorDavid Weber
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SeriesHonor Harrington series
GenreMilitary science fiction
Publication date
2012
Media typePrint (Hardback & Paperback)
PagesXXX
Preceded byMission of Honor 
Followed by(n.a.) 

A Rising Thunder by David Weber and scheduled to be published in January, 2012[1] by Baen Books, will be the thirteenth novel set in the Honorverse in the main Honor Harrington series.

Cover summary[edit]

Xxxxxx

Xxxxxxxxxxx[2]

Plot summary[edit]

Xxxx

References[edit]

  1. ^ Expect the first snippets around October or September 2011.
  2. ^ "Mission of Honor-ARC". Baen Books. Archived from the original on 17 February 2010. Retrieved 17 February 2010.
  • Xxxx
  • Xxx

External links[edit]

Preceded by Honor Harrington books Succeeded by
none

Category:2010 novels Category:Honorverse books Category:Novels by David Weber


'A Beautiful Friendship' - David Weber Young Adult Honorverse book[edit]

A Beautiful Friendship
AuthorDavid Weber
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SeriesHonor Harrington series
GenreMilitary science fiction
Publication date
2011
Media typePrint (Hardback & Paperback)
PagesXXX
Preceded byMission of Honor 
Followed by(n.a.) 

A Beautiful Friendship by David Weber and scheduled to be published in late 2011 by Baen Books, will be a "prequel" novel set in the Honorverse in the main Honor Harrington series. As of November 2010 the title is not yet fixed.

Cover summary[edit]

Xxxxxx

Xxxxxxxxxxx[1]

Plot summary[edit]

Xxxx

Quote from Interview[edit]

During a podcast interview with "TheD6Generation", David Weber appeared to be referring to both In Fire Forged and the upcoming October 2010 Young Adult book when he said:

"And all of these books will be set 250 years before Honor Harrington's birth. So, the Star Kingdom of Manticore is basically Denmark at this point, a small prosperous, back of nowhere different kingdom."[2][3]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference Mission of Honor-ARC was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ Podcast interview with DW at: D6G Ep 66: David Weber Interview & Game Strategies (Begin listening at approximately 1:06, esp. at 1:30, and end at 1:56.)
  3. ^ The quote from DW does seem to conflict with a July '09 blog entry by Weber at the Baen Bar where he stated that at least one of the stories will include Honor Harrington at Casimir. (i.e.: Wrong time frame.) See the Sat Aug 08, 2009 4:29 pm blog entry's re-posting of his comments.
  • Xxxx
  • Xxx

External links[edit]

Preceded by Honor Harrington books Succeeded by
none

Category:2010 novels Category:Honorverse books Category:Novels by David Weber


List of G-codes commonly found on Fanuc and similarly designed controls[edit]

Sources: Smid;[1] Green et al.[2]

FANUC Operator's Manual, publication number B-63524EN/01, Dec., 2007/Edition 01.04 (c) FANUC LTD, 2001
GE Famuc Automation, Computer Numerical Control Products: "Operator's Manual", February 2000, publication number B-63004EN/02. (NO Copyright data or notice found.)

Explanation for Table:
The primary source material for the below table is the 2007 edition of the FANUC Operator's Manual. When different sources use different names or descriptors for the same G-code, the FANUC term is used in the table's description column. (Other source's descriptors may appear in smaller type in the Corollary info column.)
One source (citation needed) has stated that the Haas brand name has the largest share of the marketplace in terms of machines sold both in the US and internationally. However, this is only in terms of machines (and controllers) sold from one manufacturer. G-codes for the Haas system are represented in the below table's 2nd column.
The FANUC controller is the most common CNC controller used across all brand names of CNC machines in general. Within the GE-Fanuc series of controllers, the most common G-code system is "A" (or "standard"), as represented in the below table's 1st column. Some manufacturers[3] also support "B" (or "Special") on some machines, these are shown in the below table's next-to-last column. Note that the G-code system is hard-wired into a machine, and is NOT generally selectable.

G-Codes
A[4] H[5] Description Group No. Corollary info Milling
( M )
Turning
( T )
B[6] C[7]
G00 G00 Rapid motion positioning 00 On 2- or 3-axis moves, G00 (unlike G01) does not necessarily move in a single straight line between start point and end point. It moves each axis at its max speed until its vector is achieved. Shorter vector usually finishes first (given similar axis speeds). M T G00 G00
G01 G01 Linear interpolation 00 The most common workhorse code for feeding during a cut. The program specs the start and end points, and the control automatically calculates (interpolates) the intermediate points to pass through that will yield a straight line (hence "linear"). The control then calculates the angular velocities at which to turn the axis leadscrews. The computer performs thousands of calculations per second. Actual machining takes place with given feed on linear path. M T G01 G01
G02 G02 Circular interpolation CW or Helical interpolation CW 00 Cannot start G41 or G42 in G02 or G03 modes. Must already be compensated in earlier G01 block. M T G02 G02
G03 G03 Circular interpolation CCW or Helical interpolation CCW 00 Cannot start G41 or G42 in G02 or G03 modes. Must already be compensated in earlier G01 block. M T G03 G03
G04 G04 Dwell 00 Takes an address for dwell period (may be X, U, or P) M T G04 G04
G05 P10000 . High-precision contour control (HPCC)
or: High speed cycle cutting
00 Uses a deep look-ahead buffer and simulation processing to provide better axis movement acceleration and deceleration during contour milling M   G05 G05
G05.1 Q1. . Ai Nano contour control 00 Uses a deep look-ahead buffer and simulation processing to provide better axis movement acceleration and deceleration during contour milling M      
G07 . Imaginary axis designation 00
(or Hypothetical axis interpolation)
M   G07 G07
G07.1
(G107)
. Cylindrical Interpolation 00   ? T G07.1
(G107)
G07.1
(G107)
G08 . Look ahead control 00   ? ? G08 G08
G09 G09 Exact stop check 00   M T    
  G10 Set Offsets 00 ___ ? T    
G10 . Programmable data input 00 ___
( G10 is not "single-shot"; see notes below.)
M T G10 G10
G10.6 . Tool retract & recover 00       G10.6 G10.6
G11 . Data write cancel 00 or Programmable data input CANCEL
( G11 is not "single-shot"; see notes below.)
M T G11 G11
G12 . Full-circle interpolation, clockwise ? Fixed cycle for ease of programming 360° circular interpolation with blend-radius lead-in and lead-out. Not standard on Fanuc controls. M      
G12.1
(G112)
. Polar Coordinate Interpolation Mode 21   ? T G12.1
(G112)
G12.1
(G112)
G13 . Full-circle interpolation, counterclockwise ? Fixed cycle for ease of programming 360° circular interpolation with blend-radius lead-in and lead-out. Not standard on Fanuc controls. M      
G13.1
(G113)
. CANCEL Polar Coordinate Interpolation Mode 21   ? T G13.1
(G113)
G13.1
(G113)
  G14 Secondary Spindle Swap 17
(Haas)
  ? T    
  G15 CANCEL Secondary Spindle Swap 17
(Haas)
  ? T    
G17 G17 XpYp plane selection 16   M   G17 G17
G18   ZpXp plane selection 16 On most lathes, ZX is the only available plane, so no G17 to G19 codes are used. M T G18 G18
  G18 Plane selection 02
(Haas)
___ ? T    
G19 G19 YpZp plane selection 16
(02 Haas)
  M   G19 G19
G20 G20 Programming in inches 06 Somewhat uncommon except in USA and (to lesser extent) Canada and UK. However, in the global marketplace, competence with both G20 and G21 always stands some chance of being necessary at any time. The usual minimum increment in G20 is one ten-thousandth of an inch (0.0001"), which is a larger distance than the usual minimum increment in G21 (one thousandth of a millimeter, .001 mm, that is, one micrometre). This physical difference sometimes favors G21 programming. M T G20 G70
G21 G21 Programming in millimeters (mm) 06 Prevalent worldwide. However, in the global marketplace, competence with both G20 and G21 always stands some chance of being necessary at any time. M T G21 G71
G22 . Stored stroke check function ON 09       G22 G22
G23 . Stored stroke check function OFF 09       G23 G23
G24 . ___ ?          
G25 . Spindle speed fluctuation detection OFF 08       G25 G25
G26 . Spindle speed fluctuation detection ON 08       G26 G26
G27 . Reference position return check 00       G27 G27
  G28 Return to Machine Zero, set optional G29 Reference point 00
(Haas)
___ ? T    
G28   Return to home position (machine zero, aka machine reference point) 00 (or: Return to reference position)
Takes X Y Z addresses which define the intermediate point that the tool tip will pass through on its way home to machine zero. They are in terms of part zero (aka program zero), NOT machine zero.
M T G28 G28
  G29 Return from Reference Point 00
(Haas)
    T    
G30 . (or: 2nd, 3rd and 4th reference position return)
Return to secondary home position (machine zero, aka machine reference point)
00 Takes a P address specifying which machine zero point is desired, if the machine has several secondary points (P1 to P4). Takes X Y Z addresses which define the intermediate point that the tool tip will pass through on its way home to machine zero. They are in terms of part zero (aka program zero), NOT machine zero. M T G30 G30
G30.1 . Floating Point Reference Return 00          
G31 G31 Skip function 00 (used for probes and tool length measurement systems) M   G31 G31
G32 G32 Single-point threading, longhand style (if not using a cycle, e.g., G76) 01 Similar to G01 linear interpolation, except with automatic spindle synchronization for single-point threading.   T G33 G33
G33 . Constant-pitch threading _   M      
G33 . Single-point threading, longhand style (if not using a cycle, e.g., G76) _ Some lathe controls assign this mode to G33 rather than G32.   T    
G34 . Variable-pitch threading 01   M   G34 G34
G35 . Circular threading (clockwise) 01       G35 G35
G36 . Circular threading (counterclockwise) 01       G36 G36
G36 . Automatic tool compensation X (When the bit 3 (G36) if parameter No. 3405 is set to 0) 00       G36 G36
G37 . Automatic tool compensation Z 00       G37 G37
G37.1 . Automatic tool compensation X 00       G37.1 G37.1
G37.2 . Automatic tool compensation Z[8] 00       G37.2 G37.2
G38 .              
G39 . Corner circular interpolation 00       G39 G39
G40 G40 Tool radius compensation off 07 Kills G41 or G42. M T G40 G40
G41 G41 Tool nose radius compensation left 07 Milling: Given righthand-helix cutter and M03 spindle direction, G41 corresponds to climb milling (down milling). Takes an address (D or H) that calls an offset register value for radius.
Turning: Often needs no D or H address on lathes, because whatever tool is active automatically calls its geometry offsets with it. (Each turret station is bound to its geometry offset register.)
M T G41 G41
G42 G42 Tool nose radius compensation right 07 Similar corollary info as for G41. Given righthand-helix cutter and M03 spindle direction, G42 corresponds to conventional milling (up milling). M T G42 G42
G43 . Tool height offset compensation negative _ Takes an address, usually H, to call the tool length offset register value. The value is negative because it will be added to the gauge line position. G43 is the commonly used version (vs G44). M      
G44 . Tool height offset compensation positive _ Takes an address, usually H, to call the tool length offset register value. The value is positive because it will be subtracted from the gauge line position. G44 is the seldom-used version (vs G43). M      
G45 . Axis offset single increase _   M      
G46 . Axis offset single decrease _   M      
G47 . Axis offset double increase _   M      
G48 . Axis offset double decrease _   M      
G49 . Tool length offset compensation cancel _ Kills G43 or G44. M      
G50 G50 Define the maximum spindle speed 00 Takes an S address integer which is interpreted as rpm. Without this feature, G96 mode (CSS) would rev the spindle to "wide open throttle" when closely approaching the axis of rotation.   T G92 G92
G50   Scaling function cancel _   M      
G50   Position register (programming of vector from part zero to tool tip) _ Position register is one of the original methods to relate the part (program) coordinate system to the tool position, which indirectly relates it to the machine coordinate system, the only position the control really "knows". Not commonly programmed anymore because G54 to G59 (WCSs) are a better, newer method. Called via G50 for turning, G92 for milling. Those G addresses also have alternate meanings (which see). Position register can still be useful for datum shift programming.   T G92 G92
G50.3   Workpiece coordinate system preset 00       G92.1 G92.1
G50.2
(G250)
  Polygonal turning CANCEL 20       G50.2
(G250)
G50.2
(G250)
G51.2
(G251)
  Polygonal turning 20       G51.2
(G251)
G51.2
(G251)
G52 G52 Local coordinate system (LCS) 00 Temporarily shifts program zero to a new location. This simplifies programming in some cases. M   G52 G52
G53 G52 Machine coordinate system 00 Takes absolute coordinates (X,Y,Z,A,B,C) with reference to machine zero rather than program zero. Can be helpful for tool changes. Nonmodal and absolute only. Subsequent blocks are interpreted as "back to G54" even if it is not explicitly programmed. M T G53 G53
G54 G54 Work coordinate system 1 (WCSs) 14 Have largely replaced position register (G50 and G92). Each tuple of axis offsets relates program zero directly to machine zero. Standard is 6 tuples (G54 to G59), with optional extensibility to 48 more via G54.1 P1 to P48. M T G54 G54
G55, G56, G57, G58, G59 G55, G56, G57, G58, G59 Work coordinate systems 2 to 6 (WCSs) _ Have largely replaced position register (G50 and G92). Each tuple of axis offsets relates program zero directly to machine zero. Standard is 6 tuples (G54 to G59), with optional extensibility to 48 more via G54.1 P1 to P48. M T G55, G56, G57, G58, G59 G55, G56, G57, G58, G59
G54.1 P1 to P48   Extended work coordinate systems _ Up to 48 more WCSs besides the 6 provided as standard by G54 to G59. Note floating-point extension of G-code data type (formerly all integers). Other examples have also evolved (e.g., G84.2). Modern controls have the hardware to handle it. M T    
G60 . Single direction positioning 00   ? ? G60 G60
G65 . Macro calling 00       G65 G65
G66 . Macro modal call 12       G66 G66
G67 . Macro modal call CANCEL 12       G67 G67
G68 . Mirror image for double turrets ON or balance cut mode 04       G68 G68
G68.1 . Coordinate system rotation start or three-dimensional coordinate system conversion mode on 17       G68.1 G68.1
G69 . Mirror image for double turrets OFF or balance cut mode CANCEL 04       G69 G69
G70 G70 Fixed cycle, multiple repetitive cycle, for finishing (including contours) 00 Finishing Cycle   T G70 G72
G71 G71 Fixed cycle, multiple repetitive cycle, for roughing (Z-axis emphasis) 00 O.D./I.D. Stock Removal Cycle   T G71 G73
G72 G72 Fixed cycle, multiple repetitive cycle, for roughing (X-axis emphasis) 00
(& 00 Haas)
("Stock Removal in Facing" or "End Face Stock Removal Cycle")   T G72 G74
G73 G__ Fixed cycle, multiple repetitive cycle, for roughing, with pattern repetition _     T G73 G75
G73 G__ Peck drilling cycle for milling - high-speed (NO full retraction from pecks) __ Retracts only as far as a clearance increment (system parameter). For when chipbreaking is the main concern, but chip clogging of flutes is not. M   G73 G75
G74 G__ Peck drilling cycle for turning __     T G74 G75
G74 G__ Tapping cycle for milling, lefthand thread, M04 spindle direction _   M   G74 G75
G75 G__ Peck grooving cycle for turning _     T G75 G77
G76   Fine boring cycle for milling _   M      
G76 G76 Threading cycle for turning, multiple repetitive cycle 00     T G76 G78
G80 G__ CANCEL canned cycle 10
(09 Haas)
Milling: Kills all cycles such as G73, G83, G88, etc. Z-axis returns either to Z-initial level or R-level, as programmed (G98 or G99, respectively).
Turning: Usually not needed on lathes, because a new group-1 G address (G00 to G03) cancels whatever cycle was active.
M T G80 G80
G81 G81 Simple drilling cycle __
(09 Haas)
No dwell built in
(or: "Drill Canned Cycle")
M      
G82 G82 Drilling cycle with dwell __
(09 Haas)
Dwells at hole bottom (Z-depth) for the number of milliseconds specified by the P address. Good for when hole bottom finish matters.
(or: "Spot Drill Canned Cycle")
M      
G83 G83 Peck drilling cycle (full retraction from pecks) 10
(09 Haas)
Returns to R-level after each peck. Good for clearing flutes of chips.
(or: "Normal Peck Drilling Canned Cycle")
M   G83 G83
G84 G84 Tapping Canned Cycle, righthand thread, M03 spindle direction 10
(09 Haas)
___
(or: "Tapping Canned Cycle")
M   G84 G84
G84.2   Tapping cycle, righthand thread, M03 spindle direction, rigid toolholder _   M      
G85 G85 Cycle for face boring 10
(09 Haas)
No dwell built in
(or: "Boring Canned Cycle")
M   G85 G85
  G86 Bore and Stop Canned Cycle (09 Haas)     T    
  G87 Bore and Manual Retract Canned Cycle (09 Haas) ___   T    
G87   Cycle for side drilling 10
(09 Haas)
Dwells at hole bottom (Z-depth) for the number of milliseconds specified by the P address. Good for when hole bottom finish matters. M   G87 G87
  G88 Bore and Dwell and Manual Retract Canned Cycle (09 Haas)     T    
G88   Cycle for side tapping 10
(09 Haas)
Returns to R-level after each peck. Good for clearing flutes of chips. M   G88 G88
G89 G89 Cycle for side boring
(or: "Bore and Dwell Canned Cycle")
10
(09 Haas)
  M   G89 G89
G90 . Absolute programming _ Positioning defined with reference to part zero.
Milling: Always as above.
Turning: Sometimes as above (Fanuc group type B and similarly designed), but on most lathes (Fanuc group type A and similarly designed), G90/G91 are not used for absolute/incremental modes. Instead, U and W are the incremental addresses and X and Z are the absolute addresses. On these lathes, G90 is instead a fixed cycle address for roughing.
M T (B)    
G90 G90 Fixed cycle, simple cycle, for roughing (Z-axis emphasis) 01
(& 01 Haas)
When not serving for absolute programming (above)   T (A) G77 G20
G91   Incremental programming _ Positioning defined with reference to previous position.
Milling: Always as above.
Turning: Sometimes as above (Fanuc group type B and similarly designed), but on most lathes (Fanuc group type A and similarly designed), G90/G91 are not used for absolute/incremental modes. Instead, U and W are the incremental addresses and X and Z are the absolute addresses. On these lathes, G90 is a fixed cycle address for roughing.
M T (B)    
G92 . Position register (programming of vector from part zero to tool tip) 01 Same corollary info as at G50 position register.
Milling: Always as above.
Turning: Sometimes as above (Fanuc group type B and similarly designed), but on most lathes (Fanuc group type A and similarly designed), position register is G50.
M T (B)    
G92 G92 Threading cycle, simple cycle 01     T (A)    
G94   Feedrate per minute 01 On group type A lathes, feedrate per minute is G98. M T (B)    
G94 G94 Fixed cycle, simple cycle, for roughing (X-axis emphasis)
(or: "End Facing Cycle")
01
(& 01 Haas)
When not serving for feedrate per minute (above)   T (A) G79 G24
  G95 Live Tooling Rigid Tap (Face) 09
(Haas)
___        
G95   Feedrate per revolution _ On group type A lathes, feedrate per revolution is G99. M T (B)    
G96 G96 Constant surface speed (CSS) 02
(13 Haas)
Varies spindle speed automatically to achieve a constant surface speed. See speeds and feeds. Takes an S address integer, which is interpreted as sfm in G20 mode or as m/min in G21 mode.   T G96 G96
G97 G97 Constant spindle speed 02
(13 Haas)
Takes an S address integer, which is interpreted as rev/min (rpm). The default speed mode per system parameter if no mode is programmed. M T G97 G97
G98   Return to initial Z level in canned cycle 05   M      
G98 G98 Feedrate per minute (group type A) 05
(10 Haas)
Feedrate per minute is G94 on group type B.   T (A) G94 G94
G99   Return to R level in canned cycle 05
(10 Haas)
  M   G95 G95
G99 G99 Feedrate per revolution (group type A) 05 Feedrate per revolution is G95 on group type B.   T (A) G95 G95
G100   B-axis control-Program registration complete 00 ___        
G101   B-axis control-First program registration start 00 ___        
G102   B-axis control-Second program registration start 00 ___        
G103   B-axis control-Third program registration start 00 ___        
G110   B-axis control-One motion operation programming 00 ___        
  G100 Disable Mirror Image 00
(Haas)
___   T    
  G101 Enable Mirro Image 00
(Haas)
___   T    
  G102 Programmable Output to RS-232 00
(Haas)
___   T    
  G103 Limit Block Lookahead 00
(Haas)
___   T    
  G105 Servo Bar Command __
(Haas)
___   T    
G107   See G07.1            
G110   B-axis control-One motion operation programming 00 ___        
  G110 Coordinate System 12
(Haas)
___   T    
  G111 Coordinate System 12
(Haas)
___   T    
G112   See G12.1            
G113   See G13.1            
  G114 - G129 Coordinate System 12
(Haas)
___   T    
  G112 XY to XZ interpretation 04
(Haas)
___   T    
  G113 G112 Cancel 04
(Haas)
___   T    
  G154 Select Work Coordinates P1-99 12
(Haas)
___   T    
  G159 Background Pickup / Part Return __
(Haas)
___   T    
  G160 APL Axis Command Mode On __
(Haas)
___   T    
  G161 APL Axis Command Mode Off __
(Haas)
___   T    
  G184 Reverse Tapping Canned Cycle for Left Hand Threads 09
(Haas)
___   T    
  G186 Reverse Live Tool Rig Tap (For Left Hand Threads) 09
(Haas)
___   T    
  G187 Accuracy Control 00
(Haas)
___   T    
  G195 Live Tool Radial Tapping (Diameter) 00
(Haas)
___   T    
  G196 Reverse Live Tool Vector Tapping (Diameter) 00
(Haas)
___   T    
  G198 Disengage Synchronous Spindle Control 00
(Haas)
___   T    
  G199 Engage Synchronous Spindle Control 00
(Haas)
___   T    
  G200 Index on the Fly 00
(Haas)
___   T    
  G211 Manual Tool Setting __
(Haas)
___   T    
  G212 Auto Tool Setting __
(Haas)
___   T    
G250   See G50.2            
G251   See G51.2            

Notes:
1. If the CNC enters the clear state when the power it turned on or the CNC is reset, the modal G codes change as follows.

(1) G codes marked with a "" (bullet) in above table are enabled. (This includes G00, G10, G13.1/G112, G18, G22, G25, G40, G50.2/G250, G54, G67, G69, G80, G97 and G99.)
(2) When the system is cleared due to power-on or reset, whichever is specified, either G20 or G21, remains effective.

2. G codes of group 00 except G10 and G11 are single shot G codes.
4. G codes of different groups can be specified in the same block. If G codes of the same group are specified in the same block, the G code specified last is valid.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference Smid2008 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference Greenetal1996 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Doosan is an example of one company that supports both Systems "A" and "B".
  4. ^ If a G-code appears in the "A" column, but there is no matching information in that row's columns "B" or "C", then that data likely came from only the Smid and/or Green et al. sources.
  5. ^ When a G-code appears in the "H" column, the source is one of the two Haas Operator's Manuals.
  6. ^ When a G-code appears in the "B" or "C" column, the source is the GE-Fanuc manual.
  7. ^ The last column, for GE-Fanuc's G-code system C is included for the sake of 'completeness'. No information has been found stating how much or how little System-C is used. Information derived from the same GE-Fanuc manual referred to earlier.
  8. ^ This might be a typo, perhaps "Y" was meant. Not confirmed in text.


Bibliography[edit]

  • Oberg, Erik; Jones, Franklin D.; Horton, Holbrook L.; Ryffel, Henry H. (1996), Green, Robert E.; McCauley, Christopher J. (eds.), Machinery's Handbook (25th ed.), New York: Industrial Press, ISBN 978-0-8311-2575-2, OCLC 473691581.
  • Smid, Peter (2008), CNC Programming Handbook (3rd ed.), New York: Industrial Press, ISBN 9780831133474, LCCN 2007045901.
  • GE Famuc Automation, Computer Numerical Control Products: "Operator's Manual", February 2000, publication number B-63004EN/02. (NO Copyright data or notice found.)
  • Haas Automation, "Mill Operator's Manual, 96-8000 Rev AH March 2011", pages 151, 152, and 223+. File name: "98-8000-2.pdf", retrieved from: THIS WEB PAGE, Feb. 26th 2011.
  • Haas Automation, "Lathe Operator's Manual, 96-8700 Rev AH March 2011", pages 183, 184, and 249. File name: "98-8700.pdf", retrieved from: THIS WEB PAGE, Feb. 26th 2011.

T-Mobile/AT&T and the 180-day countdown timer[edit]

On August 26, 2011 the FCC's "180-day timer" was restarted at day 83. This implies that around December 4, 2011 the FCC should announce their decision regarding AT&T's purchase of T-Mobile.[1]

This "code" originally derived from:

Justice John Paul Stevens' time in office will surpass that of...
...Hugo Black in −5,237 days

Xxxx

WSJ Article[edit]

Where are the below "Statements" to be found???
Here's one: Press Release: AT&T Inc. – Thu, Nov 24, 2011 2:33 AM EST.
Here's another: Press Release: AT&T Inc. – Thu, Nov 24, 2011
Here's an "original" source: Press Release: November 24, 2011 02:33 AM Eastern Time

If the balance of the original 180 day countdown timer was to be used, then the withdrawal date of November 23, 2011 would imply there is a balance of around eleven days remaining.

Press Release: AT&T Inc. – Thu, Nov 24, 2011 2:33 AM EST
TECHNOLOGY NOVEMBER 26, 2011 "AT&T Bickers With FCC on Merger Review"

By GREG BENSINGER

AT&T Inc. battled for months with U.S. regulators to approve its $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile USA. Now the telecommunications giant is bickering with the government over whether it can withdraw the proposed deal.

AT&T said it would take a $4 billion charge in the final quarter, an acknowledgement the company's proposed $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile USA faces an increasingly uphill battle. Anton Troianovski has details on The News Hub.

In a statement Friday, AT&T said commissioners missed their chance to vote on a proposal announced Tuesday from Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski that the merger be sent before an administrative law judge for approval. The carrier announced it had withdrawn its FCC application in the early hours of the Thanksgiving holiday in the U.S.

FCC officials had said Thursday their options included granting the withdrawal with prejudice, which means AT&T couldn't reapply later, or denying it outright, which would allow the FCC to move forward with plans to vote on the hearing. The agency has yet to take official action.

"We have every right to withdraw our merger from the FCC, and the FCC has no right to stop us," AT&T General Counsel Wayne Watts said in the statement. "Any suggestion the agency might do otherwise would be an abuse of procedure which we would immediately challenge in court."

An AT&T spokesman declined to comment beyond the statement. An FCC spokeswoman had no response.

AT&T's merger plan has faced mounting challenges, including a Justice Department suit to block the deal and similar lawsuits from seven state attorneys general and from rivals Sprint Nextel Corp. and C Spire Wireless. Had FCC commissioners approved the chairman's recommendation, AT&T would have faced a hearing before an administrative law judge after it completed its federal trial stemming from the Justice Department suit.

The carrier needs approval from both the Justice Department, which will judge it on antitrust grounds, and the FCC, which weighs whether mergers are in the best interests of the public.

If it were to reapply to the FCC, AT&T would get a new 180-day timeframe under which the FCC could respond. AT&T is hoping to get Justice Department clearance for the merger—which would catapult it to the largest U.S. carrier by subscribers—either through the trial scheduled to begin in February or an out-of-court settlement.

AT&T also said Thursday it will take a charge in this year's final quarter for $4 billion, a sum it may owe T-Mobile parent Deutsche Telekom AG if the merger fails to go through. That works out to $3 billion in breakup fees and $1 billion in estimated book spectrum value. —Amy Schatz contributed to this article.

Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204452104577060400382853704.html#ixzz1emGL6Gwg

List of EVSE Manufacturers[edit]

The below is a list of manufacturers who make Electric Vehicle Service Equipment. An EVSE

Note that to use the term "Appliance" would be a mistake. Also, for Class 1 & Class 2 EV Charging Stations, the actual Charger is located in the vehicle, not in the Charging Station. Thus the Charging Station should NOT generally be referred to as a Charger.

EVSE Class 2 Manufacturers[edit]

(240 volt, single phase)

  Company Vending:
Std./Optional (or None)
EVITP
Partner/Advisor?
Web Comments
01 Coulomb Technologies, Yes/Yes
(CDMA Cell phone)
Yes Web Big presence in the EVSE market.
02 AeroVironment,
(partnered with Nissan re "Leaf"),
Unknown Yes Web   
03 ClipperCreek, No/Yes Yes Web   
04 General Electric, Unknown Yes Web & Web   
05 Hubbell, Unknown Yes Web See: "PEP Stations".
06 Leviton, Yes
(CDMA Cell phone)
Yes Web Their product is very similar to those from Coulomb Technologies.
07 Legrand / Pass & Seymour, Unknown (L)
No (P&S)
Yes Web   
08 Milbank Manufacturing Co., No Yes Web Apparently no products available.
09 PEP Stations
(Plug-in Electric Power),
Yes
(Ethernet)
Yes Web Represented by Hubbell
10 Schneider Electric, not as of 11/'11 Yes Web   
11 Eaton, No No Web teamed with Best Buy re the Mitsubishi i.
12 ECOtality, Unknown No Web   
13 Ford Focus Electric Charging Station, No No Web Developed with Leviton.
14 SemaConnect, Unknown No Web   
15 Siemens, Unknown No Web See Coulomb
16 SPX, Unknown No Web   

EVSE Class 1 Manufacturers[edit]

(120 Volt, single phase)

This list is yet to be compiled.

EVSE Class 3 Manufacturers[edit]

(480 Volt, three phase)

This list is yet to be compiled.

See also[edit]

Sources and/or External Links[edit]

.

Samsung Galaxy S (series)[edit]

Samsung Galaxy S is a series of three smartphones manufactured by Samsung, including the:

History[edit]

Samsung uses letter codes to categorize their larger series of "Galaxy" phones. The "S" series is the high end subset of that larger group. {See also the the Galaxy history, as summarized in the below table.}

Date Model[2]
June 2009 Samsung Galaxy (i7500)
November 2009 Samsung Galaxy Lite/Spica/Portal (i5700)
June 2010 Samsung Galaxy S Captivate/Vibrant/
Fascinate/Epic 4G/Mesmerize etc. (i9000)
? Samsung Galaxy S Plus[Note 1]
July 2010 Samsung Galaxy 3/Apollo/Mini (i5800)
July 2010 Samsung Galaxy Beam/Halo (i8520)
August 2010 Samsung Galaxy Europa/550/5 (i5500)
? Samsung Galaxy 551[Note 1]
February 2011 Samsung Galaxy Ace (GT-S5830)
February 2011 Samsung Galaxy Fit (S5670)
March 2011 Samsung Galaxy Gio (GT-S5660)
March 2011 Samsung Galaxy Mini (GT-S5570)
April 2011 Samsung Galaxy Prevail (SPH-M820)
April 2011 Samsung Galaxy Pro
May 2011 Samsung Galaxy S II, SkyRocket, Captivate Glide,
Epic Touch 4G (i900 with several variations)
June 2011 Samsung Exhibit 4G
June 2011 Samsung Galaxy Z
August 2011 Samsung Galaxy R (I9103)[Note 1]
August 2011 Samsung Galaxy Y (GT-S5360)[Note 1]
August 2011 Samsung Galaxy W (I8150)[Note 1]
Oct. 2011 Samsung Stratosphere[Note 1]
November 2011 Samsung Galaxy Nexus
January 2012 Samsung Galaxy Pro Duos
May 2012 Samsung Galaxy S III

Note(s)[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f Eighteen of the table entries were mentioned in Dan Rowinski's "A Brief History of the (Samsung) Galaxy" article. The remaining six (plus?) were already listed in this article prior to a revision.

Comparison[edit]

This table is primarily intended to show the differences between the three models of the "Galaxy S":

Samsung Galaxy S[3] Samsung Galaxy S II[4][5] Samsung Galaxy S III[6][7]
Release Date June 2010 2011 ~May 2012
Dimensions 122.4 mm (4.82 in) H
64.2 mm (2.53 in) W
9.9–14 mm (0.39–0.55 in) D.
125.3 mm (4.93 in) H
66.1 mm (2.60 in) W
8.49 mm (0.334 in) D (standard)

5.11 in (130 mm) H
2.74 in (70 mm) W
0.38 in (9.7 mm) D (Sprint)

H 136.6 mm (5.38 in)
W 70.6 mm (2.78 in)
D 8.6 mm (0.34 in)[8]
Weight 118–155 g (4.2–5.5 oz) 130 g (4.6 oz) (standard)
116 g (4.1 oz) (Sprint)
133 g (4.7 oz)
Display 800×480 px, 4.0 in (10 cm) at 233 ppi WVGA Super AMOLED (0.37 megapixels) with mDNIe 800×480 px, 10.8 cm (4.3 in) at 218 ppi 100,000:1 contrast ratio (typical) WVGA Super AMOLED Plus (0.37 megapixels) 4.5" Rogers Model Only 1280×720px WXGA HD Super AMOLED PenTile, 12.2 cm (4.8 in), 306 ppi
CPU Samsung Exynos 3110 (ARM Cortex A8), 1 GHz
(known before as Samsung Hummingbird S5PC110)[9]
1.2 GHz dual-core ARM Cortex-A9[10] SoC processor; Samsung Exynos (GT-I9100)(under AT&T, Sprint, and outside US models); Texas Instruments OMAP4430 (GT-I9100G)

1.5 GHz dual core Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 (T-Mobile Model / SGSII LTE & HD LTE Model & Rogers Model)[11]

1.4 GHz Exynos 4412 quad-core system on a chip (SoC) processor (also known as Exynos 4 Quad),[12][13] however the US version will have Qualcomm’s dual-core Snapdragon S4 processor processor instead.[14]
GPU 512 MB 1 GB ARM Mali-400 MP running at >400 MHz[15]
RAM 512 MB 1 GB 1 GB
Storage 4 GB
Expansion slot: microSD memory card (SD 2.0 compatible)
16 GB 16/32/64 flash memory [8]
Storage, Removable 4 GB
Expansion slot: microSD memory card (SD 2.0 compatible)
16 GB 64GB SDXC[16]
2G GSM/GPRS/EDGE 850/900/1800/1900 MHz GSM/GPRS/EDGE 850/900/1800/1900 MHz GSM/GPRS/EDGE 850/900/1800/1900 MHz GSM/GPRS/EDGE
3G HSPA/WCDMA 850/900/1900/2100 MHz adds 1700(US only), removes 1900 MHz same as One V
Sensors Proximity, Ambient Light and G-Sensor adds Gyro and Digital compass Multi-touch touch screen, aGPS[4], GLONASS
Connectivity Wi-Fi: 802.11b/g/n, Wi-Fi hotspot
NO DLNA
Standard 5-pin micro USB 2.0 only
adds mobile high-definition video link (MHL) for USB or HDMI connection adds 802.11a
Camera, Rear 5 MP
720p HD video recording
No front camera
8 MP
1080p HD video recording
adds VGA front camera
8 Mpx
Camera, Front 5 MP
720p HD video recording
No front camera
8 MP
1080p HD video recording
adds VGA front camera
1.9 Mpx
Battery 1500 mAh 1650 mAh 2100 mAh

Comparison v2[edit]

  Samsung Galaxy S[3] Samsung Galaxy S II (GT-I9100)[4][5] Samsung Galaxy S III[6][7]
available 2010 2011 May 29, 2012 in Europe
display   800×480 px, 10.8 cm (4.3 in) at 218 ppi 100,000:1 contrast ratio (typical) WVGA Super AMOLED Plus (0.37 megapixels) 4.5" Rogers Model Only 1280×720 pixels WXGA HD Super AMOLED PenTile[17] 12.2 cm (4.8 in), 306 ppi[18]
rear_camera   8 Mpx Back-illuminated sensor with auto focus, 1080p 30 fps full HD video recording, full HD reproduction, and stills. Single LED flash. megapixels
front_camera   2 Mpx for video chatting, video recording (VGA), and stills 1.9 megapixels
os   Android 4.0.3 (Ice Cream Sandwich) with TouchWiz UI 4.0 Android 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich) with TouchWiz "Nature UX" UI
input   Multi-touch touch screen, headset controls, proximity and ambient light sensors, 3-axis gyroscope, magnetometer, accelerometer, aGPS, and stereo FM-radio[19] Multi-touch touch screen, aGPS,[20] GLONASS, Barometer
CPU (International)   1.2 GHz dual-core ARM Cortex-A9[10] SoC processor; Samsung Exynos (GT-I9100) (under AT&T, Sprint, and outside US models); Texas Instruments OMAP4430 (GT-I9100G) 1.4 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A9
CPU (US Only)   1.5 GHz dual core Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 (T-Mobile Model / SGSII LTE & HD LTE Model & Rogers Model) Qualcomm’s dual-core Snapdragon S4 SoC
GPU   ARM Mali-400 MP (GT-I9100)[21][22]


Adreno 220 (models with Snapdragon SoC)
PowerVR SGX540 (GT-I9100G) || ARM Mali-400 MP[23]

memory   GB RAM GB RAM
storage   16 GB flash memory 16/32/64 GB flash memory [8]
memory_card   microSD (up to 64 GB SDXC) 64 GB microSDXC[16]
networks   Dual band CDMA2000/EV-DO Rev. A 800 and 1900 MHz;
WiMAX 2.5 to 2.7 GHz;
802.16e 2.5G (GSM/GPRS/EDGE): 850, 900, 1800, and 1900 MHz
UMTS: 850, 900, 1700 (T-Mobile USA only), 1900, and 2100 MHz
HSPA+: 21/42 Mbit/s; HSUPA: 5.76 Mbit/s LTE 700/1700 Rogers Only
GSM/GPRS/EDGE 850, 900, 1800, and 1900 MHz

UMTS/HSPA+ (21 Mbps down, 5.76 Mbps up) 850, 900, 1900, and 2100 MHz
LTE In certain regions

battery   Li-ion 1650 mAh (Original Model) & 1850mAh (Rogers Model), Official Extended 2000mAh kit by Samsung available. 2100 mAh
size   125.3 mm (4.93 in) H
66.1 mm (2.60 in) W
8.49 mm (0.334 in) D (standard)

5.11 in (130 mm) H
2.74 in (70 mm) W
0.38 in (9.7 mm) D (Sprint)

H 136.6 mm (5.38 in)
W 70.6 mm (2.78 in)
D 8.6 mm (0.34 in)[8]
weight   130 g (4.6 oz) (standard)
116 g (4.1 oz) (Sprint)
133 g (4.7 oz)
type   Touchscreen smartphone Touchscreen smartphone
connectivity   3.5 mm TRRS; Wi-Fi (802.11a/b/g/n); Wi-Fi Direct; Bluetooth 3.0; micro USB 2.0; Near field communication (NFC); DLNA; MHL; HDMI; USB Host (OTG) 2.0 Bluetooth 4.0, Wi-Fi supporting 802.11 a/b/g/n, NFC, AllShare
Example      
Example      
Example      
Example      
Example      
Example      
Example      
Example      
Example      
Example      

External links[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ http://www.viodi.com/2011/08/26/fcc-restarts-180-day-clock-on-att-t-mobile-merger-cutting-through-all-the-hype/
  2. ^ http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/a-brief-history-of-the-samsung-galaxy.php their history
  3. ^ a b http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SGH-T959HABTMB-specs
  4. ^ a b http://www.samsung.com/global/microsite/galaxys2/html/specification.html
  5. ^ a b two-b
  6. ^ a b three
  7. ^ a b three-b
  8. ^ a b c d "The Samsung Galaxy S III revealed".
  9. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S#Processor
  10. ^ a b "Samsung announces UK availability of the GALAXY S II". Samsung UK. 13 April 2011.
  11. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II#Processor
  12. ^ "Samsung announces 1.4GHz Exynos 4 Quad as basis for Galaxy S3". Retrieved 26 April 2011.
  13. ^ http://www.tmonews.com/2012/04/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-quad-core-processor-for-the-next-galaxy/
  14. ^ http://www.tmonews.com/2012/04/samsung-executive-says-to-expect-snapdragon-processors-in-us-bound-galaxy-s-iii/
  15. ^ "Supposed Galaxy S3 benchmark results spotted, soundly beats the competition".
  16. ^ a b http://www.phonenews.com/samsung-announces-galaxy-s-iii-android-flagship-20250/ Cite error: The named reference "sdxc" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  17. ^ Burns, Chris (26 April 2012). "Samsung picks Pentile for Galaxy S III". SlashGear. SlashGear.com. Retrieved 4 May 2012.
  18. ^ "Samsung Introduces the GALAXY S III, the Smartphone Designed for Humans and Inspired by Nature (Press Release)". Retrieved 3 May 2012.
  19. ^ "Samsung Announces the GALAXY S II, World's Thinnest Smartphone that Will Let You Experience More with Less". Samsung.com. 15 February 2011.
  20. ^ Burns, Chris (25 April 2012). "Galaxy S III specs appear in benchmark app". SlashGear. SlashGear.com. Retrieved 4 May 2012.
  21. ^ "Mali-400 MP – ARM". ARM.com. Retrieved 6 August 2011.
  22. ^ "Samsung's Galaxy S II Preliminary Performance: Mali-400MP Benchmarked". Anandtech. 14 February 2011.
  23. ^ Klug, Brian; Shimpi, Anand Lal (3 May 2012). "Samsung Galaxy S III Performance Preview: It's Fast". AnandTech. AnandTech.com. Retrieved 4 May 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Category:Android devices Galaxy S Galaxy S II Galaxy S III Category:2010 introductions Category:Products introduced in 2011 Category:Products introduced in 2012

United States House Committee on Education and the Workforce Members, 113th Congress[edit]

The below table needs to be redone.

The current chairman is John Kline, from Minnesota, and the Ranking Member is George Miller of California.

Majority Minority


New Republicans as of the 113th:



New Democrats as of the 113th:

Sources: H.Res. 6 (Chairs), H.Res. 7 (D) and H.Res. 17 (R)

Comparison Chart Apple AirPort Extreme[edit]

Approx. release date Consumer Nickname AirPort Extreme Model Processor Speed Wireless standard Gigabit ethernet Guest network[5] Radio Type MIMO config IPv6 router mode**
Jan 7, 2003 round/original M8799LL/A A1034 (processor here) (speed here) 802.11b/g No No


Single band

2.4 GHz

?? No
Jan 9, 2007 generation 1 MA073LL/A A1143 (processor here) (speed here) 802.11a/b/g/n* No No Dual band

2.4 GHz OR 5 GHz

3x3:2 No
Aug 7, 2007 generation 2 MB053LL/A A1143 (processor here) (speed here) 802.11a/b/g/n* Yes No Dual band

2.4 GHz OR 5 GHz

3x3:2 No
Mar 3, 2009 generation 3 MB763LL/A A1301 (processor here) (speed here) 802.11a/b/g/n* Yes Yes Dual band (simultaneous)

2.4 GHz AND 5 GHz

2x2:2 (in each band) No
Oct 20, 2009 generation 4 MC340LL/A A1354
Marvell 88F6281 1.2 GHz "Kirkwood" SoC [6][7] (speed here) 802.11a/b/g/n Yes Yes Dual band (simultaneous)

2.4 GHz AND 5 GHz

3x3:3 (in each band) Yes (does not work over PPPoE).
Jun 21, 2011 generation 5 MD031LL/A A1408 Marvell 88F6281 1.2 GHz "Kirkwood" SoC [6][7] (speed here) 802.11a/b/g/n Yes Yes Dual band (simultaneous)

2.4 GHz AND 5 GHz

3x3:3 (in each band) Yes (does not work over PPPoE).

Minneapolis mayoral election, 2013 (section) Declared[edit]

Name Party/Alliance Source(s) Web Site(s)
* Mark V. Anderson (Simplify Government) [8][9] _
* Merrill Anderson (Jobs & Justice) [8][10] _
* Mark Andrew,
   former Hennepin County Commissioner
(DFL) [11][12][note 1] markforminneapolis.com
* Neal Baxter (Independent) [8][13] _
* Troy Benjegerdes (Local Energy/Food) [8][14] _
* Alicia K. Bennett (DFL) [8][15] _
* Edmund Bernard Bruyere (Legacy — Next Generation) [8][16] _
* Bob "Again" Carney Jr (Demand Transit Revolution) [8][17] _
* Jackie Cherryhomes,
   former City Council President, lobbyist
(DFL) [18][8] _
* Christopher Clark (Libertarian) [8][19] _
* Dan Cohen,
   former City Councilmember, Ward 7
(Independent) [20] _
* James Everett (Green) [8][21] _
* Bob Fine (DFL) [8][22] _
* Cyd Gorman (Police Reform) [8][23] _
* Mike Gould (DFL) [8][24] _
* Kurtis W. Hanna (Pirate) [8][25] _
* John Leslie Hartwig (Independent) [8][26] _
* Betsy Hodges,
   City Councilmember, Ward 13
(DFL) [27][18][8] betsyhodges.org
* Gregg A. Iverson (DFL) [8][28] _
* Bill Kahn (Last Minneapolis Mayor) [8][29] _
* Jaymie Kelly (Stop Foreclosures Now) [8][30] _
* Tony Lane (Socialist) [8][31] _
* Doug Mann (Green) [8][32] _
* Abdun M. Rahaman "The Rock" (We the People...) [8][33] _
* Joshua Rea (End Homelessness Now) [8][34] _
* Don Samuels,
   City Councilmember, Ward 5
(DFL) [18][8] _
* Ole Savior (Republican) [8][35] _
* Captain Jack Sparrow (Count All Rankings) [8][36] occupirate.blogspot.com
* James "Jimmy" L. Stroud, Jr. (The People's Choice) [8][37] _
* Jeffrey Alan Wagner (DFL) [8][38] _
* John Charles Wilson (Lauraist Communist) [8][39] _
* Cam Winton,
   attorney
(Independent, responsible inclusive) [18][40][8][41] wintonformayor.org
* Stephanie Woodruff,
   software executive and Citizen Member of Minneapolis Audit Committee
(DFL) [42][43] _
* Rahn V. Workcuff (Independence) [8][44] _
* Christopher Robin Zimmerman (Libertarian) [8][45] _

Mayoral Election 2013 Results[edit]

None of the candidates passed the threshold of 39,588 votes to be elected in the first round, necessitating several rounds of vote transfers.

Unofficial results.
Minneapolis mayoral election, 2013[46][47]
Political party/principle Candidate % 1st Choice Round 1 Round 2
DFL Betsy Hodges 36.55 28,935
DFL Mark Andrew 24.74 19,584
DFL Don Samuels 10.53 8,335
independent responsible inclusive Cam Winton 9.49 7,511
DFL Jackie Cherryhomes 4.45 3,524
DFL Bob Fine 2.64 2,094
Jobs Downtown Casino Dan Cohen 2.27 1,798
DFL Stephanie Woodruff 1.28 1,010
Simplify Government Mark V. Anderson 1.23 975
Green Party of Minnesota Doug Mann 0.98 779
Republican Party of Minnesota Ole Savior 0.88 693
DFL Alicia K. Bennett 0.44 351
Green Party of Minnesota James Everett 0.44 347
We the people... Abdul M. Rahaman "The Rock" 0.43 338
Count All Rankings Captain Jack Sparrow 0.33 264
Socialist Workers Party Tony Lane 0.28 219
DFL Mike Gould 0.26 204
Minnesota Pirate Party Kurtis W. Hanna 0.25 200
Stop Foreclosures Now Jaymie Kelly 0.25 196
Libertarian Party of Minnesota Christopher Clark 0.24 188
Libertarian Christopher Robin Zimmerman 0.21 170
DFL Jeffrey Alan Wagner 0.21 164
Local Energy/Food Troy Benjegerdes 0.19 148
Independent Neal Baxter 0.18 145
DFL Gregg A. Iverson 0.18 144
Jobs & Justice Merrill Anderson 0.14 108
End Homelessness Now Joshua Rea 0.14 108
Independent John Leslie Hartwig 0.12 97
Last Minneapolis Mayor Bill Kahn 0.12 97
Legacy-Next Generation Edmund Bernard Bruyere 0.09 70
Independence Party of Minnesota Rahn V. Workcuff 0.08 65
The people's choice James "Jimmy" L. Stroud, Jr. 0.08 64
Demand Transit Revolution Bob "Again" Carney Jr 0.07 56
Police Reform Cyd Gorman 0.05 39
Lauraist Communist John Charles Wilson 0.05 37
N/A Write-in 0.15 117
Exhausted ballots
  • Threshold: 39,588
  • Valid: 79,174
  • Blank: 834
  • Turnout: 80,101

The Math[edit]

The point where the 2nd round of voting will begin is not a fixed number, but rather it is calculated based upon if a ranked candidate can theoretically get enough votes to win, then he/she and every candidate with a lesser vote total will have their ballots recounted for the next choice.[48]

Here is an example of how the math could work:

Hodges: 79,174 - 28,935 = 50,239 available
Andrew: 50,239 - 19,584 = 30,655 available
{ 50,239 + 19,584 = 69,823 } > 39,588
Samuels: 30,655 - 8,335 = 22,320 available
{ 22,320 + 8,335 = 30,655 } [not greater than] 39,588

Thus, the votes for Samuels, or at least those candidates with lesser totals, should be recounted using the second choice.

Wikimedia Commons gallery[edit]

Below are selected images from Wikimedia, using the search terms of
CVN-78[49] and
Ford Aircraft Carrier.[50]

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SPELLING OF THIS PAGE IS NOT A MISTAKE. IT IS ASSISTENT. THIS NOTICE TO BE REMOVED BEFORE THE END OF DEC. 13TH, MIDNIGHT.



The original that this article was based upon can be seen at URL: https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolux_Assistent.
Example of an older model.

Assistant is a household appliance (originally) from Electrolux, which was introduced in 1940. It was designed by Alvar Lenning and became a bestseller for Electrolux.[51] It is produced since 1969 in Ankarsrum when production was moved from Motala. It is sold today in several different colors.[52][53]

Hook versus Roller discussion[edit]

There is some disagreement (and/or discussion) between the (U.S.-based) so-called "experts" as to if the dough hook is needed or not (as opposed to the scraper and roller method). Here are some examples:

This first pair show a lighter density mixture, thus is not as relevant for bread dough users:

* Roller or dough hook? Magic Mill DLX Electrolux 1: Roller and Scraper (1:36, YouTube).
* Roller or dough hook? Magic Mill DLX Electrolux 2: Bread Hook (2:23, YouTube).

Two good examples of the different methods:

References (Källor)[edit]

  1. ^ Mr. Price have somehow gained Committee Seniority over eleven other members, Hunter to Heck, despite not being listed as members of this committee in the 112th Congress.
  2. ^ MR. Marchant have somehow gained Committee Seniority over eleven other members, Hunter to Heck, despite not being listed as members of this committee in the 112th Congress. However, Marchant may have served in this committee in the 110th Congress. If correct, this would have gained him some committee seniority.
  3. ^ Mr Salmon has properly gained Committee Seniority over seven other members, DesJarlais to Heck, despite not being listed as members of this committee in the 112th Congress. This is because of his previous membership on this committee when he earlier served in Congress.
  4. ^ Mr, Guthrie has somehow gained Committee Seniority over seven other members, DesJarlais to Heck, despite not being listed as members of this committee in the 112th Congress.
  5. ^ About the Guest network feature of AirPort Extreme and Time Capsule
  6. ^ a b http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-reviews/31564-apple-airport-extreme-gen-5-reviewed
  7. ^ a b http://www.anandtech.com/show/4577/airport-extreme-5th-gen-and-time-capsule-4th-gen-review-faster-wifi-/3
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af "Candidate Filings". Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 31 July 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  9. ^ "Mark V Anderson Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 31 July 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  10. ^ "Merrill Anderson Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 5 August 2013. Retrieved 6 August 2013.
  11. ^ Rao, Maya (7 February 2013). "Andrew latest to join Minneapolis mayoral race". Star Tribune. Retrieved 10 February 2013.
  12. ^ "Mark Andrew Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 5 August 2013. Retrieved 5 August 2013.
  13. ^ "Neal Baxter Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 12 August 2013. Retrieved 12 August 2013.
  14. ^ "Troy Benjegerdes Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 9 August 2013. Retrieved 10 August 2013.
  15. ^ "Alicia K. Bennett Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 12 August 2013. Retrieved 13 August 2013.
  16. ^ "Edmund Bernard Bruyere Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 1 August 2013. Retrieved 1 August 2013.
  17. ^ "Bob "Again" Carney Jr Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 6 August 2013. Retrieved 6 August 2013.
  18. ^ a b c d Boros, Karen (11 January 2013). "Potential successors to Minneapolis Mayor Rybak already lining up support". MinnPost. Retrieved 19 January 2013.
  19. ^ "Christopher Clark Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 9 August 2013. Retrieved 10 August 2013.
  20. ^ Cite error: The named reference Cohen hoping for was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  21. ^ "James Everett Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 1 August 2013. Retrieved 2 August 2013.
  22. ^ "Bob Fine Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 5 August 2013. Retrieved 6 August 2013.
  23. ^ "Cyd Gorman Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 13 August 2013. Retrieved 14 August 2013.
  24. ^ "Mike Gould Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 6 August 2013. Retrieved 6 August 2013.
  25. ^ "Kurtis W. Hanna Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 9 August 2013. Retrieved 10 August 2013.
  26. ^ "John Leslie Hartwig Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 7 August 2013. Retrieved 7 August 2013.
  27. ^ Cite error: The named reference rybak_mpr was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  28. ^ "Gregg A. Iverson Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 30 July 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  29. ^ "Bill Kahn Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 13 August 2013. Retrieved 13 August 2013.
  30. ^ "Jaymie Kelly Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 12 August 2013. Retrieved 13 August 2013.
  31. ^ "Tony Lane Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 8 August 2013. Retrieved 10 August 2013.
  32. ^ "Doug Mann Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 30 July 2013. Retrieved 30 July 2013.
  33. ^ "Abdun M Rahaman "The Rock" Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 31 July 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  34. ^ "Joshua Rea Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 12 August 2013. Retrieved 13 August 2013.
  35. ^ "Ole Savior Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.Minneapolis.gov. City of Minneapolis. 30 July 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  36. ^ "Captain Jack Sparrow Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 12 August 2013. Retrieved 13 August 2013.
  37. ^ "James "Jimmy" L. Stroud, Jr. Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 12 August 2013. Retrieved 13 August 2013.
  38. ^ "Jeffrey Alan Wagner Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 13 August 2013. Retrieved 13 August 2013.
  39. ^ "John Charles Wilson" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 2 August 2013. Retrieved 2 August 2013.
  40. ^ Rao, Maya (25 March 2013). "Independent Minneapolis mayoral candidate says he's 'the only fresh set of eyes'". Star Tribune. Retrieved 14 April 2013.
  41. ^ "Cam Winton Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 12 August 2013. Retrieved 13 August 2013.
  42. ^ Boros, Karen (15 July 2013). "Mayoral candidate Woodruff: School achievement gap is Minneapolis' biggest issue". MinnPost. Retrieved 23 July 2013.
  43. ^ "Stephanie Woodruff Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 8 August 2013. Retrieved 10 August 2013.
  44. ^ "Rahn V Workcuff Affidavit of Candidacy" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 30 July 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  45. ^ "Christopher Robin Zimmerman" (PDF). Vote.MinneapolisMN.gov. City of Minneapolis. 30 July 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  46. ^ "Results for Selected Contests in 43000 - Minneapolis". Minnesota Secretary of State. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
  47. ^ "2013 Minneapolis Election Results: Mayor". City of Minneapolis. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
  48. ^ The rules for this process are not available online. Explanation received via a phone conversation with the Minneapolis Elections Office.
  49. ^ https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&search=CVN-78&fulltext=Search&uselang=en
  50. ^ https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&search=Ford+Aircraft+Carrier&fulltext=Search&uselang=en
  51. ^ http://group.electrolux.com/en/growth-and-industrial-design-688/
  52. ^ http://www.assistent-original.com/website2/1.0.2.0/8/2/
  53. ^ http://www.assistent.co.uk/History.aspx

Kategori:Electrolux

External links[edit]

Category:Home appliance brands Category:Companies of Sweden Category:Home appliance manufacturers Category:Household brands Category:Companies related to the Wallenberg family * Category:Companies established in 1918

Sepkoski Curve[edit]

Major extinction events[edit]

In a landmark paper published in 1982, Jack Sepkoski and David M. Raup identified five mass extinctions. They were originally identified as outliers to a general trend of decreasing extinction rates during the Phanerozoic,[1] but as more stringent statistical tests have been applied to the accumulating data, the "Big Five" cannot be so clearly defined, but rather appear to represent the largest (or some of the largest) of a relatively smooth continuum of extinction events.[1]

Example of a Sepkoski Curve chart, on dn display at Milwaukee Public Museum,[2] 1st floor.
  1. Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (End Cretaceous, K-T extinction, or K-Pg extinction): 66 Ma at the Cretaceous(Maastrichtian)-Paleogene(Danian) transition interval.[3] The K–T event is now officially called the Cretaceous–Paleogene (or K–Pg) extinction event in place of Cretaceous-Tertiary. About 17% of all families, 50% of all genera[4] and 75% of all species became extinct.[5] In the seas it reduced the percentage of sessile animals to about 33%. All non-avian dinosaurs became extinct during that time.[6] The boundary event was severe with a significant amount of variability in the rate of extinction between and among different clades. Mammals and birds emerged as dominant land vertebrates in the age of new life.
  2. Triassic–Jurassic extinction event (End Triassic): 200 Ma at the Triassic-Jurassic transition. About 23% of all families, 48% of all genera (20% of marine families and 55% of marine genera) and 70% to 75% of all species went extinct.[4] Most non-dinosaurian archosaurs, most therapsids, and most of the large amphibians were eliminated, leaving dinosaurs with little terrestrial competition. Non-dinosaurian archosaurs continued to dominate aquatic environments, while non-archosaurian diapsids continued to dominate marine environments. The Temnospondyl lineage of large amphibians also survived until the Cretaceous in Australia (e.g., Koolasuchus).
  3. Permian–Triassic extinction event (End Permian): 251 Ma at the Permian-Triassic transition. Earth's largest extinction killed 57% of all families, 83% of all genera and 90% to 96% of all species[4] (53% of marine families, 84% of marine genera, about 96% of all marine species and an estimated 70% of land species, including insects).[7] The evidence of plants is less clear, but new taxa became dominant after the extinction.[8] The "Great Dying" had enormous evolutionary significance: on land, it ended the primacy of mammal-like reptiles. The recovery of vertebrates took 30 million years,[9] but the vacant niches created the opportunity for archosaurs to become ascendant. In the seas, the percentage of animals that were sessile dropped from 67% to 50%. The whole late Permian was a difficult time for at least marine life, even before the "Great Dying".
  4. Late Devonian extinction: 375–360 Ma near the Devonian-Carboniferous transition. At the end of the Frasnian Age in the later part(s) of the Devonian Period, a prolonged series of extinctions eliminated about 19% of all families, 50% of all genera[4] and 70% of all species.[citation needed] This extinction event lasted perhaps as long as 20 Ma, and there is evidence for a series of extinction pulses within this period.
  5. Ordovician–Silurian extinction events (End Ordovician or O-S): 450–440 Ma at the Ordovician-Silurian transition. Two events occurred that killed off 27% of all families, 57% of all genera and 60% to 70% of all species.[4] Together they are ranked by many scientists as the second largest of the five major extinctions in Earth's history in terms of percentage of genera that went extinct.

Despite the popularization of these five events, there is no fine line separating them from other extinction events; indeed, using different methods of calculating an extinction's impact can lead to other events featuring in the top five.[10]

The older the fossil record gets, the more difficult it is to read. This is because:

  • Older fossils are harder to find because they are usually buried at a considerable depth in the rock.
  • Dating older fossils is more difficult.
  • Productive fossil beds are researched more than unproductive ones, therefore leaving certain periods unresearched.
  • Prehistoric environmental disturbances can disturb the deposition process.
  • The preservation of fossils varies on land, but marine fossils tend to be better preserved than their sought after land-based counterparts.[11]

It has been suggested that the apparent variations in marine biodiversity may actually be an artifact, with abundance estimates directly related to quantity of rock available for sampling from different time periods.[12] However, statistical analysis shows that this can only account for 50% of the observed pattern,[citation needed] and other evidence (such as fungal spikes)[clarification needed] provides reassurance that most widely accepted extinction events are indeed real. A quantification of the rock exposure of Western Europe does indicate that many of the minor events for which a biological explanation has been sought are most readily explained by sampling bias.[13]

.

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Mark Andrew, Jackie Cherryhomes, Betsy Hodges, Don Samuels, Gary Schiff & Cam Winton (Independent {Republican}) were featured in the Star Tribune article: Minneapolis Mayoral Hopefuls.

{{DEFAULTSORT:How Firm a Foundation}}


{{hushållsstub}}

Talk:2016_U.S._Supreme_Court_vacancy[edit]

Some Obama possibilities include[edit]

from more than one source:


and:[14]


Other sources [15] add in:

Republican possibilities include[14][edit]

Beltway Reference[edit]

...Located south of Minneapolis, but still inside the Interstate 494/694 Beltway.

Kings Choice[edit]

The King's Choice
Directed byErik Poppe
Written byHarald Rosenløw-Eeg
Jan Trygve Røyneland
Produced byFinn Gjerdrum
Stein B. Kvae
StarringJesper Christensen
Anders Baasmo Christiansen
Tuva Novotny
Katharina Schüttler
Karl Markovics
Juliane Köhler
Rolf Kristian Larsen
Erik Hivju
CinematographyJohn Christian Rosenlund
Edited byEinar Egeland
Music byJohan Söderqvist
Distributed byNordisk Filmdistribusjon
Release date
  • 23 September 2016 (2016-09-23)
Running time
133 minutes
CountriesNorway
Ireland
LanguagesNorwegian
Danish
German
Budget$7.5 million[16]
Box office$9.1 million[17]

The King's Choice (Norwegian: Kongens nei) is a 2016 biographical war film directed by Erik Poppe. It is a co-production between Norway and Ireland,[18] and was selected as the Norwegian entry for the Best Foreign Language Film at the 89th Academy Awards.[19][20] In December 2016, it made the shortlist of nine films to be considered for a nomination at the 89th Academy Awards.[21]

The film is related to King Haakon VII's decision to support a continuation of fighting the German invasion forces rather than acceding to German demands and surrender Norway to Nazi Germany and the Norwegian collaborator Vidkun Quisling. The consequences of the government's refusal to surrender, and the king's support of that, were continued hostilities, the Norwegian royal family's dramatic escape from Norway, and the World War II involvement of Norway on the Allied side.[22]

Cast (Rolleliste)[edit]

See also[edit]

Historic background[edit]

Awards and Nominations (Priser og nominasjoner)[edit]

Pris Klasse Mottaker/nominert Resultat
Amandaprisen 2017[23][24] Beste norske kinofilm Won
Beste regi Erik Poppe Nominated
Beste mannlige skuespiller Jesper Christensen Nominated
Beste mannlige birolle Karl Markovics Won
Beste mannlige birolle Anders Baasmo Christiansen Nominated
Beste filmmanus Harald Rosenløw Eeg og Jan Trygve Røyneland Won
Beste foto John Christian Rosenlund Nominated
Beste produksjonsdesign/scenografi {{ikkerød|Peter Bävman}} Won
Beste visuelle effekter {{ikkerød|Arne Kaupang}} Won
Beste musikk {{ikkerød|Johan Söderqvist}} Won
Beste klipp Einar Egeland Won
Beste lyddesign Christian Schaanning Won
Folkets Amanda Nominated
Kanonprisen 2016[25] Beste manus Harald Rosenløw Eeg og Jan Trygve Røyneland Won
Beste regi Erik Poppe Nominated
Beste mannlige hovedrolle Jesper Christensen Won
Beste lyddesign Christian Schaanning Nominated
Beste foto John Christian Rosenlund Won
Beste klipp Einar Egeland Nominated
Beste produsent Finn Gjerdrum og Stein B. Kvae Won
Filmwebs Kanonpris Won

References (Referanser)[edit]

  1. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Alroy2008 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ http://www.mpm.edu/third-planet
  3. ^ Macleod, N.; Rawson, P. F.; Forey, P. L. (April 1997). "The Cretaceous-Tertiary biotic transition". Journal of the Geological Society. 154 (2): 265–292. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.154.2.0265. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ a b c d e "extinction". Math.ucr.edu. Retrieved 9 November 2008.
  5. ^ Raup, D.; Sepkoski Jr, J. (1982). "Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record". Science. 215 (4539): 1501–1503. Bibcode:1982Sci...215.1501R. doi:10.1126/science.215.4539.1501. PMID 17788674.
  6. ^ Fastovsky DE, Sheehan PM (2005). "The extinction of the dinosaurs in North America". GSA Today. 15 (3): 4–10. doi:10.1130/1052-5173(2005)015<4:TEOTDI>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 1052-5173.
  7. ^ Labandeira CC, Sepkoski JJ (1993). "Insect diversity in the fossil record". Science. 261 (5119): 310–5. Bibcode:1993Sci...261..310L. doi:10.1126/science.11536548. PMID 11536548.
  8. ^ McElwain, J.C.; Punyasena, S.W. (2007). "Mass extinction events and the plant fossil record". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 22 (10): 548–557. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.003. PMID 17919771.
  9. ^ Sahney S & Benton MJ (2008). "Recovery from the most profound mass extinction of all time". Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological. 275 (1636): 759–65. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1370. PMC 2596898. PMID 18198148.
  10. ^ McGhee, G. R.; Sheehan, P. M.; Bottjer, D. J.; Droser, M. L. (2011). "Ecological ranking of Phanerozoic biodiversity crises: The Serpukhovian (early Carboniferous) crisis had a greater ecological impact than the end-Ordovician". Geology. 40 (2): 147. doi:10.1130/G32679.1.
  11. ^ Sole, R.V., and Newman, M., 2002. "Extinctions and Biodiversity in the Fossil Record – Volume Two, The Earth system: biological and ecological dimensions of global environment change" pp. 297–391, Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change John Wilely & Sons.
  12. ^ Smith, A.; A. McGowan (2005). "Cyclicity in the fossil record mirrors rock outcrop area". Biology Letters. 1 (4): 443–445. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0345. PMC 1626379. PMID 17148228.
  13. ^ Smith, Andrew B.; McGowan, Alistair J. (2007). "The shape of the Phanerozoic marine palaeodiversity curve: How much can be predicted from the sedimentary rock record of Western Europe?". Palaeontology. 50 (4): 765–774. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00693.x.
  14. ^ a b http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/02/14/466725863/who-are-the-possible-candidates-to-fill-scalias-seat
  15. ^ http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/02/13/scalia-replacement-obama-nominees/80357134/
  16. ^ "Innspillingen har tatt fire år – her er traileren til "Kongens nei"". NRK. Retrieved 8 April 2017.
  17. ^ "Kongens Nei (The King's Choice)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 8 April 2017.
  18. ^ "Norway picks Irish co-production The King's Choice for Oscar consideration". Scannain. 15 September 2016. Retrieved 15 September 2016.
  19. ^ Johansen, Øystein David (8 September 2016). ""Kongens nei" er Norges Oscar-kandidat". Verdens Gang. Retrieved 8 September 2016.
  20. ^ Sandwell, Ian (8 September 2016). "Oscars: Norway picks 'The King's Choice'". ScreenDaily. Retrieved 8 September 2016.
  21. ^ "Oscars: Nine Films Advance in Foreign-Language Race". Variety. 15 December 2016. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
  22. ^ "World War II". The Royal House of Norway. 8 January 2007. Retrieved 24 October 2016.
  23. ^ Cite error: The named reference amandapris was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  24. ^ "12 Amanda-nominasjoner til "Kongens nei"". tv2.no. 21 June 2017. Retrieved 27 July 2017.
  25. ^ Cite error: The named reference kanonpris was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

External links[edit]

{{DEFAULTSORT:King's Choice, The}} Category:2016 films Category:2010s drama films Category:Norwegian films Category:Norwegian drama films Category:Norwegian biographical films Category:Irish films Category:Irish drama films Category:Norwegian-language films Category:Danish-language films Category:German-language films Category:Films set in Norway Category:Films shot in Norway Category:War drama films Category:Western Front of World War II films Category:World War II films based on actual events

Howe School[edit]

Not to be confused with Howe School, of the Minneapolis Public Schools system, in the Howe Neighborhood (and the Longfellow Community) of Minneapolis, MN.

Example: You're my Mississippi[edit]

One well done variation on this theme is used in the movie "Annapolis" (2006), starring James Franco as Jake Huard

Jake Huard : He's right you know.

Twins : Can I borrow your starch?

Jake Huard : Look, I don't get it. Why are you still here?

Twins : You want to know why I stay in this room?

Jake Huard : Yeah.

Twins : Cause Jake, you're my Mississippi.

Jake Huard : I'm your what?

Twins : People who live in Arkansas, you know what their favorite state is?

Jake Huard : No.

Twins : Mississippi. Cause Mississippi's the only thing that keeps Arkansas from being the worst state in the whole country.

Jake Huard : I'm Mississippi.

Twins : Well you sure as hell ain't California. Listen, Cole and Whitaker are so busy tryin' to run you out they forgot about me. As a matter of fact, they've forgotten about every other plebe in this whole company. That's why I stay in this room Jake. Cause if Mississippi quits, then all of a sudden Arkansas is the worst state in the whole country.

See Also[edit]

Thank God for Mississippi

Affected Neighborhoods of Minneapolis[edit]

Minneapolis has a eleven identified communities, each of which has a number of neighborhoods within it. The 3rd Precinct Police Station is located on the eastern side of the Longfellow neighborhood (which is inside the Longfellow Community). The destruction has since expanded elsewhere, locally to the West, in Phillips Community (north side of Lake Street) and Powderhorn Community (south side of Lake Street), as well as to St. Paul's Midway area and possibly elsewhere.

The confrontation/Death of George Floyd took place in the Powderhorn Park neighborhood (which is inside the community of the similar name). The area covered by the 3rd Precinct (MAP) includes both the Powderhorn and Longfellow Neighborhoods.

It has since expanded to include at least the xxxx neighborhood.

Most of the rioting originally has taken place in the xxxxxx


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -