User:Markco1/sandbox

My Linkage

• Category:Categories
• Wikipedia:Cleanup resources
• Wikipedia:WikiProject_Boston
• Delete Templates

Testing Sbox

• User:Markco1/sandbox/Test
• User:Markco1/sandbox/Proj-Boston

Playing with values

• {{SITENAME}} returns Wikipedia
• {{PAGENAME}} returns Markco1/sandbox
• {{BASEPAGENAME}} returns Markco1
• {{NAMESPACE}} returns User
• {{SUBJECTSPACE}} returns User
• {{ns:1}} returns Talk
• {{ns:2}} returns User

Markco1 Category:test

Assessment instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{Project Boston}} project banner:

{{Project Boston| ... | class=??? |importance=??? ...}}

The following values may be used for class:

• FA

Category:FA-Class Boston articles; should only be used for articles that are currently listed as featured articles)

• A

Category:A-Class Boston articles; should only be used for articles that could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard.

• GA

Category:GA-Class Boston articles; should only be used for articles that are currently listed as good articles)

• B

Category:B-Class Boston articles)

• Start

Category:Start-Class Boston articles)

• Stub

Category:Stub-Class Boston articles)

The following values may be used for importance:

• Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Boston articles)
• High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Boston articles)
• Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Boston articles)
• Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Boston articles)
• if not completed, the article is added to the Category:Unknown-importance Boston articles.

Article progress grading scheme [ ]

Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editor's experience	Example
FA {{FA-Class}}	Category:FA-Class Boston articles; should only be used for articles that are currently listed as featured articles	Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information.	No further editing is necessary unless new published information has come to light.	Gilwell Park (as of January 2007)
A {{A-Class}}	Category:A-Class Boston articles; should only be used for articles that could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard.	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points.	Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage.	Durian (as of June 2006)
GA {{GA-Class}}	Category:GA-Class Boston articles; only used for articles currently listed as good articles) article must pass through the Good article nomination process.	Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job.	Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time.	Agriculture (as of June 2006)
B {{B-Class}}	Has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage and/or clarity. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles.	Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader may feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work.	Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with.	Munich air disaster (as of May 2006) has a lot of helpful material but contains too many lists, and needs more prose content & references.
Start {{Start-Class}}	The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas.	Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded.	Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage.	Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub {{Stub-Class}}	The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.	Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful.	Coffee table book (as of July 2005)