User:Mathglot/sandbox/test Farsi x2 review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Below is an example of an invitation generated by Template:x2 review help. This is an illustration of a question posted to Help talk:Substitution.

Please feel free to modify this page by testing {{x2 review help}} here if you wish.

Test 1[edit]

The following code:

{{subst:X2 review help |Romanian |article1=Vasile Duță |article2=Virgil Hnat |article3=Cornel_Patrichi |article4=Márton_Balázs |article5=Radu Mareș }} ~~~~

generates the following (including the H2 section header):

Can you help verify translations of articles from Romanian[edit]

Hello,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from Romanian to English Wikipedia?

This would involve evaluating a translated article on English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original Romanian article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including Romanian , using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from Romanian. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the Romanian article, and mark it "Pass" or "Fail" (templates {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} may be useful). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then marking it "Pass", that's even better, but it isn't required.)

If you can help, please let me know. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 03:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

This green sentence is not part of the expansion and is intended to show where the expansion ends.

Test 2[edit]

Another test, right after fixes for recursive substituion, courtest of User:TheDragonFire. Same invocation as above, i.e., this:

{{subst:X2 review help |Romanian |article1=Vasile Duță |article2=Virgil Hnat |article3=Cornel_Patrichi |article4=Márton_Balázs |article5=Radu Mareș }} ~~~~

this time generates this:

Can you help verify translations of articles from Romanian[edit]

Hello Mathglot/sandbox,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from Romanian to English Wikipedia?


This would involve evaluating a translated article on the English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original Romanian article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including Romanian , using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from Romanian. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "{".

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the Romanian article, and mark it "Pass" or "Fail" (templates {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} may be useful). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then marking it "Pass", that's even better, but it isn't required.)

If you can help, please let me know. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 06:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

This purple sentence is not part of the expansion and is intended to show where the expansion ends.

Test 3[edit]

This one is "after partial rv to see what's going on":

Can you help verify translations of articles from Romanian[edit]

Hello Mathglot/sandbox,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from Romanian to English Wikipedia?


This would involve evaluating a translated article on the English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original Romanian article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including Romanian , using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from Romanian. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the Romanian article, and mark it "Pass" or "Fail" (templates {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} may be useful). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then marking it "Pass", that's even better, but it isn't required.)

If you can help, please let me know. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 06:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

This is after the expansion.

Test 4[edit]

This one is after my changes to the header, so it doesn't mess up the ToC of the Template doc itself, but does show up on the ToC of the transcluded page. Changed language to 'Albanian' to more easily see the change in ToC (if it happens):

Can you help verify translations of articles from Albanian[edit]

Hello Mathglot/sandbox,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from Albanian to English Wikipedia?


This would involve evaluating a translated article on the English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original Albanian article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including Albanian , using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from Albanian. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the Albanian article, and mark it "Pass" or "Fail" (templates {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} may be useful). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then marking it "Pass", that's even better, but it isn't required.)

If you can help, please let me know. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 07:24, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

After expansion.