User:Oshwah/TalkPageArchives/2017-09

You are currently viewing an archive of Oshwah's user talk page from September 2017. Please do not modify this page.

These discussions are no longer active and were moved here for historical and record-keeping purposes. If you need to respond to a discussion from here, please create a new discussion on my user talk page and with a link to the archived discussion here so I can easily follow, and we'll be able to pick up where we left off no problem.

Were you trying to send me a message? No worries. Just click here to go the correct page.

Fishy username

Hi,

This username looks a bit fishy. Do you reckon this is WP:999-worthy? Adam9007 (talk) 01:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Adam9007: Nihilism is not necessarily suicidal ideation. General Ization ^Talk 01:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Adam9007! Sorry for the delay getting back to you - did you get your question answered? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:15, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

I'm not actually sure . It may not necessarily be suicidal ideation, but that doesn't mean it cannot be. Adam9007 (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Adam9007 - I say report it. If you even question whether or not something is a threat of harm, we should report it. We're not trained or certified to make the determination as to whether or not a threat is real or valid; we should report all instances and let the emergency team handle it. That being said, I don't see it like a direct and unambiguous threat, but that is irrelevant. It should be reported; it's the right thing to do. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Is it still worth it, given that it was nearly 3 weeks ago? Adam9007 (talk) 03:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Why not? I'd do it. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. It's way past my bedtime here anyway : nearly 5:30 in the morning (under normal circumstances, I'd be asleep and unaware of this conversation, so wouldn't be able to do anything). Adam9007 (talk) 04:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Microextrusion

Dear Oswah, I was the first to write about Microextrusion on wikipedia, but after sometime, everythin I wrote has been cancelled redirecting on metal the target of the technology. The term Microextrusion is used by Gimac sinc early '80s for describing a process able to process polymer with no degradation of microstructural properties. What do you suggest to do...? Actually the page doesn't have anymore the images that I put even if they were fully authorised and some literature references has been cancelled even if globally recognised... Looking fwd to hear back from you. 5.170.19.7 (talk) 20:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi there! You could try contacting the editors who made the changes that concern you. Additionally, you should start a discussion on the article's talk page regarding your concerns. Make sure to let those who are directly involved know about the discussion so that they can participate. This is part of proper dispute resolution; definitely make sure to read up on it and let me know if you have any questions. Good luck, and happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Protect my talk page again.

Can you protect my talk page again, please? I'm afraid it has happened again. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:39, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

@FilmandTVFan28: Requested attention for this on IRC since this seems to be a persistent issue for you. This has been done by Juliancolton. -- Dane ^talk 04:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Hey FilmandTVFan28! Juliancolton beat me to it ;-). If you need my assistance with anything like this, please do not hesitate to reach out to me and I'll be more than happy to help. Have a great weekend :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

As a matter fact, there is another thing you could do. The Love Pony (whose IP sockpuppets bothered me) has evaded its block again as TheNPepole. Could you deal with that user, please? — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:17, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

FilmandTVFan28 -  Done. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:26, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Just got a message about my "editing" of Melbourne Chess Club.

Sorry I have no idea how I did this as I was on a holiday during this period of time wikipedia only just alerted me of this however so is there any way I can restore my changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.188.6 (talk • contribs)

Hi there! I'm a bit confused, because you first state that you how no idea how you did this, but are then asking about how you can restore your changes. The page I was referring to was Talk:Melbourne Chess Club, which was deleted due to being a talk page of a non-existent page. The article itself (Melbourne Chess Club) was deleted as a result of this discussion at Wikipedia's articles for deletion process. I highly recommend that you read and understand this process, as it will answer your questions and explain the process, what editors look for when discussing the deletion of an article, as well as how to proceed from here after a decision is made to delete the article. If you have questions about it, let me know. Happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet case against 118 alex

Hi Oshwah A sockpuppet investigation has been opened against 118 alex again. The crucial evidence lies in the [[1]] you deleted at 05:22 today. This is to inform you that you may need to testify that the accounts involved in this present case threatened to sockpuppet and vandalise Wikipedia after successfully hacking into the 2 locked accounts. The link is at [[2]]. Thanks, 118.200.160.208 (talk) 09:27, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for the heads up! It looks like the SPI is now closed; let me know if I can do anything else to aid the process. Best -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Request

Can you please semi-protect the article Deportation of the Crimean Tatars for unregistered users? An anonymous IP keeps inserting a lot of undue weight in the article. If he has questions, he can always try to reach consensus on the talk page before resorting to disruptive editing.--Seiya (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Seiya, and thank you for leaving a message for me here. I apologize for the late response; I've been busy lately and am getting caught up on messages. It looks like the disruption has stopped, so I'm going to hold off on protecting the article for now. However, if this changes and disruption continues and protection is needed, let me know and I'll take a look. Thanks again :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your testimony is needed.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Your testimony is crucial in proving that the 2 sockpuppets involved in the [[3]] threatened to hack their Wikipedia accounts to vandalise Wikipedia via an account that you blocked and deleted yesterday at 05:22(UTC). Please provide the crucial evidence in this case. Your evidence is appreciated. 103.17.198.51 (talk) 05:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

 Done. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

pronounciation

Hello. Can you please explain to me in short how can I add a pronounciation to a certain term (as a sound recording)? I mean if I want to edit a wiki page, in which there is a term from a foreign language (foreign to English) and I want to add an example of how it sounds in original pronounciation. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Futsy (talk • contribs) 14:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Futsy! See Wikipedia:Videos for an introduction on its use in articles as well as when and how to add them. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Academy of Art / removal of my comment

Hey there!

Appreciate your moderation.

It was emotionally charged, I'm sure.

Take care,

Jay — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:205:4000:d88d:219:e3ff:fe06:432f (talk • contribs)

I reverted this edit you made for obvious reasons. It included your opinion, as well as content without a reference. Please see Wikipedia's guidelines on verifiability and neutral point of view if you still have questions. Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:22, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

please make a article about hurricane irma of 2017

please write about it so i can find out because i live in north carolina...huracane irma is supposed to come riht where i am! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.182.73.162 (talk) 23:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) See Hurricane Irma. General Ization ^Talk 23:54, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

edit article page you delete 'Jabir ibn Hayyan Medical university'

Hi before 2 hour you delete the article title page 'Jabir ibn Hayyan Medical university' because copy rights so how to use title again with different article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taif raoof (talk • contribs) 13:52, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Taif raoof - The reason I deleted the page was because it consisted almost entirely of copyright violations. Please review this policy, as well as our policy on copyrights as violating them is a very serious matter. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Betty White page

Hi,

Betty White & Allen Ludden were never divorced. They were married in 1963 and remained married until his death in 1981. Her page says they divorced in 1981.

Thanks,

SandyBearsy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.165.6 (talk) 23:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

No. Betty White (in the infobox) says "(m. 1963; d. 1981)" which means they were separated by Ludden's death. Note the other entries say "Div" indicating divorce. The article (further down) says as much. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

It is a bit ambiguous. I've gotten them mixed up before too. - BilCat (talk) 00:11, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

User talk:GeoJoe1000

This may, alas, have been a bit premature. Leastways, resolving wholeheartedly to mend one's ways at ANI doesn't seem entirely consistent to me with telling the reporting user they "lost" at ANI, nor threatening to bash them with one's pet admin (which of course you are not, but GeoJoe seems to labour under the impression you are). Pinkbeast (talk) 14:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Oshwah,

I came in here to talk to you about this very thing. It seems someone beat me to it. Could you please talk to GeoJoe1000 about this? I think you're the only person he will listen to. The ANI has been closed, with the admin protecting the article in question because he felt the alternative was to block both GeoJoe1000 and myself. But I disagree with that, since it was clear that GeoJoe1000 was edit-warring. I'm afraid that the message he will take from this is that he can talk his way out of trouble, this time by claiming that he was the victim of a personal attack; that the ANI was me trying to get back at him for last time. To be honest, I never believed that he accepted responsibility last time, but rather that it was all for show because he knew he did the wrong thing. This time around, he didn't even acknowledge any wrongdoing and instead tried to distract the admins by crying foul. I'm quite happy to work with him (despite his claims to the contrary), but he needs to lose the arrogant, aggressive attitude first—not as a condition of working with me, but so that he can work with anyone—his edit history reveals multiple instances of his coming into conflict with other editors, and his insistence that other editors should "work with him" (I have noticed he has never said "I'll work with you") amounts to those other editors doing what he wants them to.

Like I said, I'm concerned that if his attitude isn't addressed, it's only going to lead to more conflict, and that the message he will take from this episode is that he can talk his way out of trouble. After all, when I told him that he was close to violating 3RR, he responded with "your threat is noted" and went ahead with breaking 3RR anyway. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 01:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Prisonermonkeys! I apologize for the delay responding to your messages here. I've been busy both on Wikipedia and with real-life lately, and I'm just getting all caught up with messages. Did you still need assistance with this issue? Or has this been resolved? Let me know. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Oshwah,

I wouldn't say it's been resolved. We've entered a state of detente. Things have quietened down since the page was stabilised, but I get the distinct impression that he holds grudges and that his problem with me will flare up in some other form in future. I think the message he left on Spintendo's talk page tells you everything you need to know about him. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 00:02, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Mail

Hello. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Sau226 (talk) 14:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Sau226 - Cool, I'll take a look at it as soon as I can :-). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Oshwah No need sorry. The matter in the mail has been dealt with by another admin --Sau226 (talk) 07:57, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Sau226 - No problem! Thanks for letting me know! Glad you got the help that you were looking for :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Jenny Lind Tower..

My post was simply the truth, neutral or otherwise...It takes a lot of effort to find this strange tower. Then it takes more effort to reach it. When you get there, you are almost certain to be disappointed as it's an empty shell. The doorway had been sealed with concrete blocks but someone used a sledge hammer to break in, only to discover an empty shell... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.5.47 (talk) 00:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Not using for Promotion, but you said so and deleted my edit

I was trying to edit - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Georgia_Institute_of_Technology_alumni and you removed it.

Hello, I graduated from Georgia Tech in the year of 2001 with a computer science degree. I am at the moment managing director of a small company in India. The company specialises in offering software solutions to commercial organisations like CACI in UK and also other non-profit organisation in India. This is what I wanted to put up with a reference to the website. What makes you think this is promotional? Kindly explain and I will move further accordingly.

Vandu V (talk) 07:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC) Vandana Voruganti

Hi Vandu V, and welcome to Wikipedia! Did you see the message I left on your talk page here? Did you review the guidelines and policies I linked you to? This will help answer your questions and explain exactly what issues that your changes have, as well as why your attempted changes are in conflict with our guidelines and policies. If you have specific questions about these guidelines, please do not hesitate to respond and ask. I'll be happy to answer any questions you have and help you. Thanks for leaving me a message, and I wish you happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi User:Oshwah, Thanks. I reviewed the guidelines. So, how do I put myself as a graduate of Georgia Tech into it's wikipedia Alumni page? It is a minor edit, but not clear to me how else can I add an entry into Alumni table without actually editing it the way I did. I am beginner and it will help me if you support in one edit. Thanks. Vandu V (talk) 08:57, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Vandana

Eh brah, how come you undo dat

Hopefully you were able to obtain the information that I only corrected a typo with in the school motto. It said "..bretty ghetto tho" and I changed it to "..pretty ghetto tho". Have a little fun man. Any way guess some body has to keep the world from dividing by zero XD peace out yo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:601:9880:30A5:B4AE:F6E5:B39D:C9A3 (talk) 08:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Duuuuude

Just read your profile and that is like awesome man, talk about "not all heros wear capes" id buy you a coffee dude, hope you had a good weekend, btw im the dude from the school motto page XD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:601:9880:30A5:B4AE:F6E5:B39D:C9A3 (talk) 08:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Still editing

Hi man, I don't understand what you are up to here. i am trying to edit a page that would seemingly be of no consequence to you yet you reverted all my changes? Can you please declare what your interest is in this page - Gordon Matheson, Living person? Just because a page has references does not mean that they are the right ones. Can you please indicate to me what authority you have over the editorial of this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.159.95.213 (talk) 12:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi there! I saw that you had made two edits to the article. This edit removes referenced content, and this edit adds unreferenced content about his personal life (which is in violation of Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people). This is why I reverted your changes, because the removal was not explained and the addition of unreferenced content does not have a source. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

kind

why are accusing me of vandalising a page when all O have added is that the horse is now standing at a particular stud, you make no sense whatsoever, do you actually know anything about horseracing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.22.139.61 (talk) 12:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Re: My edits to the Heidi Cruz article

I made the edits because of the issue about Ted Cruz being found to have liked a porn video on twitter, and I thought it would be funny to inject a false divorce information into wikipedia into the scope of the media firestorm. 69.67.90.164 (talk) 12:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Edits to Against a Wen

Hi, I got your message and see that you deleted my edits to Against a Wen. This was not a test, and it was my goal to add the original text of the Old English charm to the page. I wasn't finished editing when everything disappeared. I would appreciate it it you could undo the deletion.

Thanks, Bolverkrr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bolverkrr (talk • contribs) 12:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Bolverkrr - My apologies.  Done. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Violent Delight

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Violent Delight, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Could you please clarify what you mean by vandalism? Somebody is editing this page with insults aimed at myself and I am merely removing them — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.2.119.146 (talk) 13:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

So... you're saying that this edit you made here wasn't vandalism? ... :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

wikipedia moderators are vandals — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.75.114.171 (talk) 15:28, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

DrStrauss's page

Just to save you the email - I've oversighted that diff. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Yunshui - HA! Well, unfortunately I... might have maybe beaten you to it before I saw this message here. I got your response - thanks :-P ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi.This is source [4]. --Марко Станојевић (talk) 15:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Just a Thanks! WilliamChrisman427 (talk) 17:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi WilliamChrisman427! Thanks! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Hurricane Jose

Hi! I haven't really checked but is there an article about Hurricane Jose? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WilliamChrisman427 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) See Hurricane Jose. General Ization ^Talk 17:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

23rd Iowa Regiment deletion

I'm sorry, what happened? I'd also like to point out that this article is cannot be fixed. Most of the contents of the article are lists of dates and places that barely relate to the subject. If they do, they are not legible. Might I recommend that this article be removed from the website and a new one be written by someone who actually knows how to use Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbyjoe987 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Just a thanks Jjgonzalezp2006 (talk) 23:03, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Jjgonzalezp2006 - No need to thank me. I'm glad we got everything straightened out and that you're back! I meant what I said, by the way... my talk page is always open to you and you are welcome to come here at any time to ask questions, get input, or if you need help with anything. I'll be more than happy to lend you a hand and make sure you're helped if you need it. I hope we stay in touch :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

:)--Jjgonzalezp2006 (talk) 00:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Jjgonzalezp2006

Some real maple syrup to go with these:

—PaleoNeonate – 00:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Beyblade Site

Hello,

I was recently messaged that some of my information on the Beyblade wikipedia was taken down. Could you please explain the reason for this? I'm very understanding, and would like to know what I did wrong. I'm very new to this :)

Thank you so much

I am teh ninga (talk) 01:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC)I am teh Ninga

(talk page watcher) @I am teh ninga: You edit was personal opinion, this is an Encyclopedia we can not use personal opinion. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of forever and a half for personal attacks towards oneself. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 01:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Wow I was about to come here and give Writ Keeper a gigantic fucking piece of my mind when I saw this on my watch list. Softlavender (talk) 02:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

{{unblock| reason=***** Insert you reason here. DO NOT FORGET TO ADD A REASON HERE BEFORE SAVING THE EDIT. DO... NOT... FORGET!!!!! ***** ~~~~}} ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of forever and a half plus 4 seconds for making a malformed unblock request. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GAB^gab 02:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Will people kindly stop wreaking havoc on my blood pressure? Softlavender (talk) 02:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

I figured, hey, it's been about 2 months since the RFA, I'd better get started on making enemies. GAB^gab 02:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

High five, GeneralizationsAreBad! Oshwah misses and knocks his beer off the table ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Is there a cardiologist in the house? Dolotta (talk) 03:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

I'm not bad at playing cards. Poker, anyone? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:18, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

If you poke her, she may scream, and that will get your block extended by 3.14 seconds more. Pie, anyone? John from Idegon (talk) 04:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Cake, please! XD ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Required reading: Wikipedia:No self attacks! ansh666 05:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

WP:IDONTLIKEIT :-P ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

• I would like to alert Writ Keeper, apparently a brand-new admin without much experience (but should still know better anyway if they passed an RfA), that they omitted the community discussion and link re: the sanction and block. Please do not repeat this error in the future. Softlavender (talk) 00:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

The creator of Sheayu Felisha Cute

The creator of Sheayu Felisha Cute might be a possible sock, though I'm not 100% sure, though looking at this Puput Mariiana II (actress) which they did create there was also a Puput Mariiana II-created by a sock of someone-but I don't know what that article was like and it was over a year ago. Wgolf (talk) 04:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Wgolf - Okay, I'll take a look. Thanks, man! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Ollier disease.

basically it says that 1 in 100,000 people are affected by olliers disease. I know for a fact its more rare then that, I have the the disease and its far rarer that 1 in 100,000. Actually, there are approx. 200 cases in english literature since the year 1881. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.65.193.188 (talk) 04:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

LGBT

Oshwah is interested in LGBT matters in Bangladesh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.110.127.63 (talk) 07:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

French Music

What exactly are the genres of french music? 197.237.141.229 (talk) 09:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

WHAT ARE WE EATING? Oh hey, it's a cheeseburger not from a can. As far as non-canned things go, thanks for being super helpful and patient with me. See! Didn't even TTR! (almost) Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 09:51, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Drewmutt! I just realized that I didn't thank you for the cheeseburger! I appreciate the food :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Hey ninny, ninny

After this reliably sourced report, I'm assuming something similar happened in your own page history? Bishonen | talk 10:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC).

Bishonen - HA! What can I say? My well of derp and stupid is endless and there's plenty for everyone! Do not drink from the well! You have been warned! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

FUN FACT: Ninny is going to be my new nickname for ... wait for it ... NinjaRobotPirate. I'm sure it will grow on him. Right? Softlavender (talk) 11:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

I've certainly been called worse! I think my favorite was NinjaRobertPirate. It makes me a little sad that my name isn't Robert, because then it would be absolutely perfect. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

the dread ninja pirate roberts? Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:55, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

i think i made a mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masonrobinson9090 (talk • contribs) 11:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Apology

Dear Wiki Guy,

I'm sorry. Pls forgive me.

Sincerely, Other Wiki Guy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannyzf1234 (talk • contribs) 12:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Kalki Birth

Remove your lock on Kalki (Birth). This is not your personal website.

Administrators protect pages and images to prevent vandalism and assist in resolving content disputes, for example. The key principle to remember here is that Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that "anyone can edit". Protecting pages defeats that goal and so page protection should be avoided when possible and kept as short as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicontrols (talk • contribs) 16:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Oshwah is preventing further disruptive editing that has occurred on that article, and as an administrator they have every right to do so. "ANyone can edit" does not mean "anyone can edit in any manner they wish". 331dot (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

@Wikicontrols,That first sentence, How disgustingly rude, almost threatning. There are proper civilised manners to speak so watch your tone. Remember, Everyone is a human being here. Regarding the second paragraph, True, However administrators have the right to decide and determine if the "edits" were made with good faith or by vandals just blalantly spreading misinformation. Anyone can edit doesn't mean they have the right to do so. It's quite a privilege as it is but sadly, many seem to manipulate the freedom given to fulfill their own agendas by changing and modifying content. I stand with Oshwah hereShotgunMavericks (talk) 18:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Apologies.

Hello, my apologies on the complete removal of the article. It was not intentional and, therefore apologize for my mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MattLion (talk • contribs) 16:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Over at the Kalki article

I'm glad you protected the page so thank you for that, However I believe the i.p address guy who made persistent edits is back under the username Wikicontrols". They have made the same edits and are giving nonsensical reasons. Please look into it. Hope they discuss it in the talk page. ShotgunMavericks (talk) 18:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

ShotgunMavericks - Hey man! No problem - the article definitely needed it. Yeah, I'm seeing a pattern of disruption like this that goes farther back - I'll keep digging into this and make sure any matters are dealt with. Thanks for the message :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:06, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Oshwah - Glad to hear that! A bit offtopic but damn, you are the coolest laid back admin I have ever met here! Plus, Really liked your talk page. Everything is so categorically set. Keep it up man! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShotgunMavericks (talk • contribs)

ShotgunMavericks - Hey man! I really appreciate your response and the kind words - thank you :-). Yeah.... being a person that's known as a jerk and on a power trip? Definitely not for me. Please do not hesitate to message me if you need help with anything around here - my talk page is always open to you and you are welcome to come here any time for help. Cheers, my friend :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

H J Whitley

I would like to know what you would liked changed. The map picture I added is the original from my Great Grandfather and it is on page 215 of The Father of Hollywood. What do you suggest? There are also video clips from ABC and Fox news. Hope this helps. WhitleyFamily

Note

Mongo NoSQL (talk · contribs)
Tiger dragon turtle (talk · contribs)

These users are the same as ProcseeBot becames SELF-AWARE and EMANCIPATE from Slakr (talk · contribs)

See this and this. Thanks. 77.139.152.217 (talk) 21:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

@Floquenbeam: just blocked one of them... 77.139.152.217 (talk) 21:59, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

And now the other one is blocked too. 77.139.152.217 (talk) 22:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Ah, I came to this from a different direction; I saw their edits to Katie's page being reverted, and looked into why... -Floquenbeam (talk) 22:07, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

teethpaste

its teethpaste and you know it

–Packerman120203

Dagga Couple moto is promo for Fields of Green for All

Hi, User:Oshwah please note the motto of the Dagga Couple is "I am not a criminal" and "Join the Q" is the motto of Fields of Green For All and is therefore used promotionally on the Dagga Couple article.--Mickey ☠ Dangerez 22:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

I am reverting. Your false huggle. See the talk page for more info.--Mickey ☠ Dangerez 23:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

ACTRIAL full protection

Hi Oshwah,

Would you mind indefinitely full and move protecting Wikipedia:New user landing page? ACTRIAL launches in less than 24 hours so having it stable for the next 6 months is needed unless we get consensus to change. Thanks. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

TonyBallioni -  Done (I applied template-editor protection so that non-admins can continue to improve it when needed). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

That seems fine. Kaldari had asked for full protection, but template editor will probably work just as well. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

It'll be fine. Nobody with template editor user rights will harm anything - this way, more people can improve it and without any red tape in the way ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, no complaints here. Thanks for doing it. Lowering it to EC also makes sense, though we'll need to up it at some point tomorrow when it launches. Thanks again :) TonyBallioni (talk) 02:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

TonyBallioni - You bet. It's what I'm here for ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Dropping in again: looks like we got the issues sorted out: since the rollout is scheduled to start in less than four hours, can you go ahead and up this back to template editor when you get the chance? Thanks. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

TonyBallioni -  Done. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Release Date for Hercules: Zero to Hero 1999 Film

My reason for editing the release date for this film is that it was inaccurate. The accurate release date for this film was August 17, 1999. A preview for the film was shown in 1999 VHS releases of Disney films such as "Alice in Wonderland", "Robin Hood", and "The Great Mouse Detective". It was released the same day as the Beauty and the Beast film, "Tales of Friendship" which was August 17, 1999. Please understand my reason for the editing of this film release date. If I violated any copyrights laws, I apologize and will take full responsibility for my actions. 167.21.141.11 (talk) 14:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)(talk) 10:20 14 September 2017 (UTC)167.21.141.11 (talk) 14:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Battle of Hydaspes page

Please read the newly editted page and give it support before another vandaliser comes on the scene Is the writing not a brillian fusion of European and Indian POVS? Lord Aseem (talk) 16:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

how

how do iget on sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.223.153 (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

User:71.236.164.171

Apparently, this user is evading block by vandalising at User talk:71.236.164.171. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:43, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Oshwah

You made an error. I made the correction because there are already citations at the beginning of the Marc Anthony article. If you check the citations right after his year of birth, all of the citations including Biography.com clearly state a birth date of September 16, 1968 not 1964.

If you could revert your change, it would make the the birth date correct.

Thanks, Ben

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

SPoore (WMF) - Damn it... I wish I had signed up, but I was so occupied with other matters and I didn't get a chance to do so. I trust that the others who have done so will reflect the voice of the project and do their best to make the project better :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

FYI about Antifa (United States) protection))

Oshwah, I blocked the edit warrior at the article 13 minutes before you protected it, see [5]. I'm consequently not sure the protection serves any purpose now, but I will certainly let you be the judge of that. I'm just going to bed, living as I do in an exotic timezone, so I won't see any reply for some hours. Please just do as you think best, up to and including removing my block. Bishonen | talk 23:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC).

Bishonen - Okay, I'll take another look. Thanks for letting me know, and have a great rest of your night :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

I still think that it does, IMO. If you look at the edit history of the page (September 11th and September 12th), you'll see what looks to be a content dispute between a group of editors that go back and fourth. I'll keep this discussion open so that others can weigh in. If others feel that this protection should be lifted, please add to this discussion so that I can weigh all of the input and make sure that I'm doing the right thing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Looks like others are starting to agree that full protection isn't needed, so I have lowered it to semi-protection :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Please reconsider PP for Antifa (United States)

Hi Oshwah. I'm asking you to please reconsider the page protection for Antifa (United States). Per this AN3 thread, only one (now blocked) user was edit warring on this page, against broad consensus, and they appear to have used RFPP as a bludgeon to get their way. Note that the report you answered referred to "Persistent BLP violations", which is clearly not the case.

This article needs a lot of work, and it would be a shame to lock it down from collaborative editing for 5 days. I will agree that if edit warring continues after the block, then PP should be reinstated, but at this moment it seems preemptive. AlexEng^(TALK) 23:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

AlexEng - Bishonen also thought that the full protection was no longer necessary due to the block placed on the user involved. Since you're uninvolved and feel it should be lifted, I'm going to do so before others feel that they have to express their opinions and mount up. There will be no red tape here! ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:01, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

"No red tape here"?! Please stay online 24/7? Jim1138 (talk) 00:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Something smells

Osh, what are the chances that a user who claims to have "12 + years of WP experiences & observations", but posts this screed as his only edit from a new account, is an indefinitely blocked/banned user? - BilCat (talk) 00:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

I think "Osh" has a COI in this area; you might want to ask a truly sane and competent admin. Softlavender (talk) 00:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

LOL ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

"Sof", I tried, but they all had Template:User rouge on their userpages, which is also a COI. :) - BilCat (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

93.189.30.226

93.189.30.226 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Appears to need a talk page adjustment. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Jim1138 -  Done. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Nate Speed/ IP 93.189.30.226

Hi Oshwah, thank you for blocking 93.189.30.226. This individual has been jumping IPs all day, and just started evading its current block with a new IP, 77.68.13.219. Would you be able to block this IP as well, and semi-protect New Line Cinema and POW! Entertainment in order to dissuade the user from jumping IPs again? (I know this will probably just cause him to start vandalizing other articles, but it seems like the best we can do). Much thanks, 青い(Aoi) (talk) 00:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Aoi -  Done. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

I've seen "PUNCHES YOU AGAIN" a number of times before. LTA... Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Oh yeah dude definitely an LTA. Without a doubt. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:08, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Jim1138, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nate Speed/Archive for this user's long history of block evasion. Thanks again for all you both do. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Antifa (United States)

I see Darkness Shines is now blocked, up to you but is the PP still needed? Doug Weller talk 09:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Doug Weller - I lowered the article to be semi-protected a few hours ago - do you feel that semi-protection is inappropriate? I'll be happy to discuss it with you if you have questions or concerns. Just let me know :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Missed that. No, I think it's ok. Events over the past year have meant that we get a lot of IPs and resurrected old accounts and new accounts knowing nothing about Wikipedia and making inappropriate edits. Doug Weller talk 10:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

CVN73

I removed a disparaging "motto" and added a unique and notable construction fact about the ship. I didn't fully understand your comments but I will take the act of reverting back to my second revision to mean that the changes are acceptable. Out of curiosity, what about my change flagged you to inspect it. Thank you. Bradley.Wayne (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Bradley.Wayne! Welcome to Wikipedia! I apologize for the reversion I made to your edit - it wasn't intentional. The software I use to navigate through recent changes started locking up, and in my attempt to fix what was going on, I had pressed the shortcut key to undo the current change that was displayed (which just happened to be yours). I removed the resulting warning and I re-instated the changes you made to the article. Please let me know if you have any questions or need help with anything. I'll me happy to help you out and point you in the right direction. Happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Maurice Boucher Anti-Vandalism

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for reverting the edits on the Maurice Boucher page earlier. Some idiot at my school changed the page to reflect an incident that happened a couple weeks ago. Everyone at the school shares an IP on Wikipedia, so I saw when you sent the message. 97.80.159.85 (talk) 22:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks for the barnstar! You bet - always happy to help :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

RevDel question

Hello Oshwah. How is (Redacted) a serious BLP violation? I would buy that it is Purely disruptive material. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Because bots are people too, Xaosflux!! That's actually pretty funny... I must have pressed the down key too few times and didn't realize that I had picked the field above the correct rev del reason. Thanks for pointing this out to me - for the record, this is obviously an RD3... lol ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, sounds good. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

I always thought a bot revert was an R2-D2. :) - BilCat (talk) 00:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Username

Hi,

Shouldn't the username be nuked from the history of this page? Adam9007 (talk) 00:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Adam9007 - Aww damnit, that account got an edit in... I must not have F5'd the contribs page for that user after I applied the block. To answer your question: Yes. ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

F5'd? Is that a hotkey for a mass rollback? Adam9007 (talk) 00:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

LOL. I open the user's contributions page, block the user, then press F5 to refresh that page to verify for certain that the user didn't manage to edit anything and that I don't need to roll the revvy devvy truck out on anything. I did refresh the page... or I ...believe that I did. Apparently I didn't, because I managed to walk away from the situation and left an edit out like that... you know, something that a TOTAL NINNY like myself would do! :-P ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Lol, I had forgotten that F5 is the hotkey for refreshing a page! The way you said it made me think it was something different. Adam9007 (talk) 00:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Adam9007 - Yeahhh, It's an advanced power not many know about ;-). I could write a Wikipedia rap song. Thug life!

♫ ♫ I'm an admin... for my homie Gs! I do an F5 to look for RD3s. I see yo shit, and I block you down - but I know you'll be back and don't fuck around. You trash BLPs, which is obviously not good. But there lots of homies that chill in the hood. We see your crap and we might not be fast... but you better watch out cause I'll block yo ass! ♫ ♫

RESPECT!!! Drops the mic and walks off the stage -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

That seriously has got to be the most stupid thing I've ever done here. Try to be a rap artist about an admin blocking someone... things will only go downhill from here when it comes to my level of stupid... lol ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

You think that's stupid? Hold my beer...

(Also, you should be doing a Ctrl+F5. It reloads the page entirely, without relying on your cache. You can't be a nerdcore rapper without knowing this stuff.) ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 02:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

I've done stupider things here, believe me. Adam9007 (talk) 01:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

The Penguins of Madagascar

I'm facing a dilemma at The Penguins of Madagascar. I rather listen to registered users, not the unregistered ones. What do you suggest I do? — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

I made a constructive edit with edit summary and all, and reverts it immediately, like he never read it, and cries vandalism even though it wasn't. Also, he has no right to choose which editors to listen to, he has to listen for everyone, regardless of status. 2600:1004:B02E:D4C6:E09C:69D7:47F6:D057 (talk) 05:07, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

FilmandTVFan28 - All editors involved in a dispute have an equal voice, and so long as they do not edit war or break 3RR, and they cooperate and follow Wikipedia's dispute resolution process and discuss the matter civilly - they should be treated with the same level of respect and given the opportunity to speak and be heard. The fact that you have an account or choose to edit without one is irrelevant. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) I should have mentioned that treating everybody equally also applies to the enforcement of Wikipedia's policies. All editors involved in this dispute will be treated exactly the same - you will be given the equal respect and opportunity to participate and discuss the dispute at-hand as anybody else. But I will also treat all editors the same when it comes to the violation of policies and the use of administrator tools to enforce them. If edit warring or disruption continues on the article, all users who are directly found to be doing so will be blocked. Discuss this dispute peacefully and follow the dispute resolution policy and work together to resolve this :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

user:Oshwah - I'm just upset about negative feedback from that user. I do understand what you're saying though. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

FilmandTVFan28 - What negative feedback are you referring to? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

The kind that said I don't play by the rules when I actually do. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

F1 2018

Hi Oshwah,

Could you please take a loot at 2018 FIA Formula One World Championship? I know things have gotten out of control and that everyone involved is equally responsible for the whole sorry mess. But now we have some new information, it's time to request some edits.

Before we do that, I have proposed that the editors involved wait 24 hours before submitting that request. My reasons are two-fold: 1) it's a complex arrangement between all parties involved, and given the scale of the disagreement, I think it's important that all editors agree on the way forward; and 2) it's a show of good faith so that admins can see that the editors involved can actually work together. I think this is quite reasonable, and has offered some previously-uninvolved editors like Joseph2302 the chance to comment on the content.

However, ever since then, GeoJoe10000 and Wikipediaeditperson have repeatedly accused me of deliberately trying to prolong the protection period so that the article is intentionally incorrect. This could not be further from the truth, and some of their comments suggest that they do not even understand why I was opposed to the edits in the first place. Any time I try to do something constructive, they immediately step in and accuse me of deliberate wrongdoing. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 04:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Prisonermonkeys - If everyone involved agrees that the full protection should be removed, and they all ping me and say so - I'll lower it without question :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

We're pretty much ready to go. My more immediate concern is that even if the content dispute is resolved, there are some editors who are more interested in settling scores than doing anything constructive. They're treating the talk page as a battleground to the point where they have lost sight of what the original issue was. The initial dispute was over the use of an article that relied on an anonymous source without providing anything to substantiate it, but some have abandoned that and are trying to settle scores. My concern is what happens if the issue isn't resolved when the protection is lifted. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 06:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

I would leave the protection in place until it's scheduled to end. It's not indefinite. That way the article get's some much needed stability. The two major edits which need to take place can be executed through edit requests. One is already live now and can be executed as no-one objects. The second should follow once we settle on the wording.Tvx1 15:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Oshwah,

As you are the admin who protected the article, could you please lift the protection on 2018 FIA Formula One World Championship? The content dispute has been resolved, appropriate changes made to the article through edit requests and everything has stabilised. There is some ongoing discussion about the precise wording on the talk page, but it can be resolved through editconsensus. There are also some extensive changes proposed for the article, but these have been discussed at length both on the talk page and at the Formula 1 WikiProject (it's a big section, but the most relevant stuff is at the bottom). You will also note that most of the key players from last week's flare-up have taken part in these discussions, demonstrating that we can work together (and the most disruptive editor has largely been neutralised). Prisonermonkeys (talk) 02:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Prisonermonkeys -  Done. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:06, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

User talk:78.110.175.49

Thanks for your help at User talk:78.110.175.49. This is the second time he has tried to delete Locomotives of the Stockton and Darlington Railway. Last time he was User talk:78.110.175.34 so he seems to be sockpuppeting himself. I think he may be somebody who has a grudge against me. Roberttherambler (talk) 15:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

OTRS comment

At OS nomination you said I do not have advanced permissions on other projects, and I currently do not have OTRS permissions (but that certainly can change). Emphasis added.

That certainly can. While it makes sense to concentrate on the OS nomination at the moment, we do have a stubborn backlog at OTRS, so I hope that when the dust settles, you would consider throwing your hat in the OTRS ring.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Sphilbrick - Sounds like I should consider doing so. Thanks for the encouragement, Sphilbrick :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Need help with reviewing a person's edit

Hey, could you do me a big favor and review someone's edit to the article, DuckTales? The individual in question is an editor called Spshu.

The reason I ask for your assistance is on a number of factors in regards to the edits they made to this article that I find questionable, considering the volume they have added in and what areas they changed. For example, they stated that they consider the small text used in the article's infobox to be extraneous in terms of formatting, but I don't agree to that at all. They also comment that the cartoon is the first Disney cartoon to be syndicated, but they have done nothing to prove this to be the case in terms of citations, and I can't say if this can be considered true or not. I stated how I felt their edits were questionable and that they should take this to the article's talk page to discuss what they wanted to do, but they just reverted it all, and claimed my reversion was unconstructive, which I find a bit hurtful when all I did was raise a concern over what was changed. Could you take a look at this, before they decide to revert again (after I reverted their reversion, requesting once more that they take the matter to talk page for discussion), please? GUtt01 (talk) 17:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

GUtt01 - Do you still need assistance with looking over this? Let me know and I'll be happy to. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Nah, the matter's resolved now. GUtt01 (talk) 06:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

GUtt01 - Cool, thanks for letting me now. I apologize for the delay getting back to you. Life gets busy for me in real life ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Re: Barry Harris (Canadian musician)

Hi - thanks for your message. At the request of Barry Harris himself I have amended his Wiki page - apologies for not initially describing the changes (I've not amended Wiki for a while) - I have since rectified this. Many thanks Servitor Vek (talk) 18:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Servitor Vek and thanks for leaving me a message here. Sorry, but editing a page where you have a conflict of interest is a behavior that's not encouraged by the community. This is due to the inability for those users to maintain a neutral point of view with their edits. Any content added can also be cited as original research, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia articles. Original research is content that's referenced off an editors personal experience, relationships, findings, and references (even if its published). You can also call it "citing yourself". This is not allowed because such content cannot be verified for authenticity or accuracy. Please review this policies and guidelines, as they are very important. If you have questions about them, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them. Thanks for understanding :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

John Daker socks

Hey Osh, just saw you reviewed my tag on the one sock account. In looking at the instructions at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/John Daker, could you by chance delete the user talk pages from these socks and create protect them? I suppose a steward should also globally lock these accounts. A CU might be necessary if there's any other accounts involved... Home Lander (talk) 20:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

After further review I've taken it to SPI, so never mind. Home Lander (talk) 20:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Home Lander - Okay, no problem. If you need my help with anything, you know where to find me ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Stop reverting my edits

My edits are not biased they are 100% fact i am adding valid information to a article yet you believe i am giving incorrect information therefore i am sorry to say i am going to report you if this continues — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonbonhz (talk • contribs) 22:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Sir John Thursby Community College

Please see Talk:Sir John Thursby Community College. Roberttherambler (talk) 22:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Cool deal; looks like everything is good now. Let me know if this is not true and I'll be happy to take a look... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:15, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

the history of roblox

the so called game roblox was let out in 2006 - 2017 till today millions still play it and create games on it some famous people such as jake paul from bazardvark is on it once a week (true fact).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Doge yt (talk • contribs) 23:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Laurie McBain

Laurie McBain passed away on August 31. I am a family member. She is my mother's first cousin. I am her god-son.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.134.150.113 (talk) 23:46, 18 September 2017‎

Hi there, and thanks for leaving me a message here. Sorry, but editing a page where you have a conflict of interest is a behavior that's not encouraged by the community. This is due to the inability for those users to maintain a neutral point of view with their edits. Any content added can also be cited as original research, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia articles. Original research is content that's referenced off an editors personal experience, relationships, findings, and references (even if its published). You can also call it "citing yourself". This is not allowed because such content cannot be verified for authenticity or accuracy. Please review this policies and guidelines, as they are very important. If you have questions about them, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them. Thanks for understanding :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Look, Oshwah. Perhaps you have a past with paintings lost on the Nazis. But let me tell you, the promise of the Web is dying by the likes of you. No personal offense, really.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.10.16.32 (talk) 00:02, 19 September 2017‎

I did a search for an obit on Laurie McBain and found nothing. Is this someone up to mischief? Jim1138 (talk) 01:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Jim1138 - Not sure, but I edited the article to fix the past-tense reference in the summary paragraph. I don't see where her death was cited at all... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

I left a message on the IP's talk page requesting a source. Jim1138 (talk) 01:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Christopher Cantwell

Is this undue? There are lots of RS google search calling Cantwell such. Cheers Jim1138 (talk)

Jim1138 - If numerous reliable sources refer to this BLP as the nickname, and it's referenced in the article - I don't see an issue with it being there. What are your thoughts? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

It seems that Cantwell has made a name for himself. I was asking for a second opinion. Should I add more of these references for the moniker? There seem to be many who "don't like it". Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Jim1138 - Adding more references to verify something can never hurt. Least that's what I think :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Added four refs. Jim1138 (talk) 10:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Nice! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

A question

Dear Oshwah, how are you? I'm here per your kind offer of help. I was trying to open a Sockpuppet investigations subpage for a user but the page was protected while I tried it for anther user and it allowed me. What's wrong? Tnx. --Mhhossein ^talk 04:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Mhhossein - Okay, first of all, why did you add "(under normal circumstances, I'd be asleep and unaware of this conversation, so wouldn't be able to do anything)" to Adam9007's response to a discussion above on my talk page in your message to me here? And secondly, I would need to know what SPI subpage you were trying to edit, exactly. Can you provide the link to it for me? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Mhhossein - And yes, by the way, I'm always happy to give you a hand if you need it :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

See the edit once again, I've not added "(under normal circumstances..." to your TP! I checked the history and found that Asam himself had added the phrase. I was trying to report Dr.K. at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations. Thank you again. --Mhhossein ^talk 06:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)let

Mhhossein - I'm a moron. Sorry for thinking you added that phrase! I... thought it was a little strange... LOL! Anyways, let me take a look. Stand by. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Mhhossein - It's protected because of abuse. What evidence do you have supporting your accusations toward Dr.K. of being a sock puppet? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

It's strange, what kind of abuse? Well, see Talk:Ali Khamenei. To be honest, I'm going to lean toward other users. Will the final report include any related accounts to that of the master, regardless of whom I have reported as puppet? --Mhhossein ^talk 07:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

The report will typically list or include any accounts that were found to link to the one you reported, if any are found, yes. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Kind and helpful like before, thank you again. --Mhhossein ^talk 07:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Mhhossein - You bet! Come back any time you need more help :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Oshwah. My respect for you, as you know, is great and it will remain great, because I know you are one of the most helpful and friendly admins. But, please, when someone comes in with a patently false and bad-faith accusation, that smacks of trying to eliminate the opposition he got at Talk:Khamenei — by using WP:CLUEless means — please give this person a warning, and tell him/her that s/he needs to clean up his/her act, and not open — or attempt to open — clueless SPI investigations against good-faith and longstanding editors, especially when it is based on no evidence at all. He already opened a clearly disruptive SPI against the other two editors who disagreed with him/her at Talk:Khamenei. That's disruptive, to say the least. Thank you. Dr. K. 17:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Dr.K.. I really appreciate your feedback regarding this discussion - I think it'll help you understand what I was thinking if I explained my strategy here (which didn't work like I had hoped). I was attempting to try and be open and helpful to the user in hopes that he/she'd provide me with details and information regarding their accusation (which I already knew to be completely without merit). This was so that I could respond to the user with the need to stop what they're doing and the need to shape up. I find that if you don't start a discussion with guns blaring at the beginning, users are more receptive and will understand your warnings and input when you confront them with their behavior. I also find that, if you just answer their questions, they'll stop what they're doing or just leave. I hope this helped you to understand what I was trying to do. I certainly wasn't trying to encourage the user to lead them in the wrong direction. Sometimes this works, sometimes this doesn't. I do try my best, though... :-/ ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

I can see your point Oshwah. It is obvious that you were not trying to encourage this user to open an SPI, so no need to explain that point. As I told you before, my respect for you is, and will remain, undiminished. I realise, that in a few, sad, cases such as this, a mild approach will not work. No problem. I accept the validity of your philosophy. :) Take care. Dr. K. 18:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Dr.K. - I appreciate that very much. Your feedback is always welcome here - I take it all as a positive learning opportunity. Thanks :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I've seen your anti-vandalism contributions for some time now when patrolling various pages and AIV, so I figured I'd hook you up with this shiny barnstar. Thanks for your work to protect the wiki! North America1000 07:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Northamerica1000! Thank you for the barnstar - I very much appreciate it :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Just realized that you gave me my 50th Anti-Vandalism barnstar... I couldn't be happier :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Whoa, this is something. I never checked out the star listings atop your user page before, so this wasn't planned, but at any rate, I do appreciate the work you do in this area. It takes time, effort and energy to patrol and correct vandalism, and keep up the good work! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:02, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

I will also add: The Big Fifty! Thanks again! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Northamerica1000 - You bet. Always happy to help :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

BEN WALKER PAGE

Please can you explain to me why you blocked my edit on the Ben Walker page. Thanks

<tps>Vandalism, but you knew that already. Acroterion (talk) 11:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism

This editor is a persistent, perncious vandal: User talk:49.0.12.206. Every couple of months.--- Maybe not pernicious, every couple of months though, and again last night, with a possible libel at Scott Putesky. scope_creep (talk) 11:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Scope creep - I took a glance at the IP's contributions and the page history. That's a tough spot, since the disruption is so slow and spaced over time. Since you've left a final warning on the IP's talk page, we should leave it at that for now. If the IP disrupts the article again despite that final warning, let me know. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:06, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

undo of previous data that was edited by me & are deleted now.

Plz undo or saved my edited data as I give some latest information about new trains ,so plz saved my deleted data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.184.74.251 (talk • contribs)

It looks like the content you're referring to is here, am I correct? If so, it appears that the additions you made were added back to the article. The reason I reverted your changes was due to your removal of content here, and without an explanation. You should be fine now, as the page appears to be to the revision as it was. If you have questions or still have issues, let me know and I'll be happy to take another look. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:09, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

saving for my deleted data.

Plz saved my deleted data that was edited by me few minutes ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.184.74.251 (talk • contribs)

See my reply above. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia profile update

Sorry oshwah Ji this is my mistake. I don't know Wikipedia pr profile kaise banate h.just janna chahti thi..I hope mujhe aap ki help ki zaroorat hogi . thnx

Curiosity, Adventure & Love page has gone!

Hi!

I only requested originally to change the title from "Curiosity, Adventure and Love" to "Curiosity, Adventure & Love," but it seems like everything is gone! Can you put it back and just change the title. not to totally remove everything on it?

It's quite sad as we have made a lot of edits there already :(

my email is sunshinedeleon.assistant@gmail.comSunshinedeleon.assistant (talk) 14:06, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Sunshinedeleon.assistant - The file should be at File:Curiosity, Adventure & Love.jpg as it should, right? Is there anything missing? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Sunshinedeleon.assistant - I see your follow-up responses asking for help, but I'm confused as to exactly what is wrong and what needs fixing. Can you elaborate so that I can help you? :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:30, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia

Sorry this is my mistake. I don't know how is possible. Can you help me ?

Curiosity, Adventure & Love page has gone!

Am sorry but I do not understand some coding here, not really technical

but the page should have the table of contents, the synopsis, awards, cast, everything, as well as the poster. if you can put it back to it's original page and just change the title of it, that would be much appreciated. thanks! (unsigned)

Please see my note at User talk:Sunshinedeleon.assistant. I don't know what happened to this user's original text. Roberttherambler (talk) 16:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Annabella Sciorra

Hello,

I didn't provide a source because all of those sources that are in the person's birth year, say she was born 1960, and not 1964.

That change you made now it's wrong. There is no source telling that she was born in 1964. She was born in 1960.

I suggest you take a look at the sources that are in the page next to her birth year, which tell that her birth year is 1960. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.132.121.132 (talk • contribs)

I see what you mean. Looks like someone changed it previously. Thanks for fixing it and for letting me know. I apologize for the confusion :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Just wondering...

Hey, I was just curious, what does the beta version add? what exact features does it include in it?

Meenakshi Rana-> Yaar please tell me the procedure of working on wikipedia. I am a blogger. I had just created my user page but wikipedia delete that i don't know why? there were no promotional content that were only about me as a blogger, about my career, my education and about my life history that why it was a problem for wikipedia? Tell tell how could i made my user page? Meenakshi Rana (talk) 17:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Meenakshi Rana

A heads up

The copyvio has returned on User:Schooliznerdyzz has returned [6] –72 _(talk) 20:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

72 - Deleted. Thanks for the heads up :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:57, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

IP vandal

• 24.190.40.112 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Could I trouble you to take swift action on this IP vandal? I already reported it on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism Thanks in advance. --Marbe166 (talk) 22:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Marbe166 -  Done. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks! :) --Marbe166 (talk) 22:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

You bet. Always happy to help :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

The Orville

Hi, sorry to be a bother. I'm writing because you've blocked The Orville page for what I believe to be a spurious report left by a user called Hattiedog. I've been editing the page for around two weeks and haven't noticed any vandalism, rather I've seen a rash of new users/novice editors who seem unaware of what the rules are or what the procedure is for TV show pages. I've reverted a few of these people myself and not once have I seen them come back to re add something, or anything that would be considered vandalism.

Through blissful ignorance myself I responded to the page protection request(My first time on this area), was reverted, reverted back and noticed at the top of the page the procedure is to ask the admin, so here I am. I really don't think it's fair that now a host of users who have contributed to the page in their own way can no longer edit because of Hattiedogs report for two weeks. I would like to request that you take a quick look at the page(Specifically the reversions), I think you'll see that pretty much all of them are excited fans unaware of the rules as mentioned, I wouldn't label any as vandals. 82.15.11.92 (talk) 23:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

There's absolutely no need to apologize; I appreciate you for messaging me and asking me to re-evaluate a decision I made. Sure, let me take a look and see what the best course of action is moving forward. The last thing I want to do is to shut out editors who are making legitimate contributions to an article and due to the protection I've applied to it. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

The article is only pending changes protected; this allows you to edit the page without restriction. The only difference is that your changes must be reviewed by a pending changes reviewer before it will go live and be displayed to the general public (non-logged in users). You shouldn't have any issues with editing the article... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Equifax

Is there a need for semi instead of pending? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.10.98.131 (talk) 03:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Is there an answer to my query? The editing rate does not seem to justify the protection level in my humble opinion. 176.10.98.131 (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The request was declined. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Welfare State ‖ 15:53, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Battle of Hydaspes consensus request

[7] at farce continues. Please read into the arguements there and give us your verdictLord Aseem (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Curiosity, Adventure & Love page has gone!

Let me again, reiterate the problem.

First of all, we have an existing page for Curiosity, Adventure and Love. Jessie Lichauco is totally different page. So this Curiosity, Adventure and Love is now missing cos somebody from your end change it's name to Curiosity, Adventure & Love which obviously has the ampersand "&". When your admin did the change, the whole page has gone!

Originally, "Curiosity, Adventure and Love" page has all the details: poster, casts, synposis, awards, etc!

Your admin deleted the whole page! We only requested to change the title but NOT TO DELETE THE PAGE!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunshinedeleon.assistant (talk • contribs) 06:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Reply of the page's content removal.

Hello there. This is Ej. part of the Wiki pages Contributors. on the 2016 memphis football team page, Some of the content were outdated that was copy and paste from the previous version. So this is completely irrelevant post something like this. That's why its removed.

Please reply back and give me a feedback (Use tildes around your name)

Sincerely ~E.J.~.

Peed-in-pants vandal

Should I just keep reverting? If not, how does it get removed? Need a Nuke-edits recommendation. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:38, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Jim1138 - This was taken care of, right? Or do you still have concerns? Let me know. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

User talk:85.195.110.38

Hi again. I'd appreciate it if you could deal with the above page. A silly unblock request. –72 _(talk) 11:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi 72 -  Done. Thanks for giving me a heads up about it. If you see any more tomfooleries like this, definite let me know so that I can quickly take care of them. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

No subject

Hi Oshwah

Previously it was written as "Reportedly, a total of 85,000 bucket seats[7] have been installed in the stadium for the 2017 FIFA U-17 World Cup to be held in India.[8] The capacity of the stadium has been increased from 68,000 to 85,000 for the FIFA U-17 World Cup". But just a week ago I visited the Stadium and asked the Ground Officials about the capacity and they told that now the capacity become 67,000. And that day only I read this article in Goal.com and then I believed this fact.

Link : http://www.goal.com/en-in/news/salt-lake-stadiums-capacity-reduced-to-66687-for-fifa-u-17-world-/i6wbcg5vyjt01k2e1uth28sd8.

Waiting for your reply.

Thanks & regards Anikesh Anikesh Majumder (talk) 11:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Anikesh Majumder - AHA! I see what happened. I didn't see that you provided a reference along with one of your other edits made to the page. I apologize for the confusion; I've restored the page to reflect the changes you made to it. Please let me know if you need anything else. Best -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Thanks Oshwah. The reference is : "http://www.goal.com/en-in/news/salt-lake-stadiums-capacity-reduced-to-66687-for-fifa-u-17-world-/i6wbcg5vyjt01k2e1uth28sd8"

Best wishes Anikesh

replace with recent updated of the school info

Hi Oshwah, I have make some changes on behalf of TWGHs SC Gaw Memorial College, as we have some recent update of our school information, we have correct and revised the details. Hope you can let all the details that I have change to be replace it again. Thanks

TWGHs S C Gaw Memorial College General Office — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twghs scgaw (talk • contribs) 11:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Why do you always revert my Liberal Point of View Edits

Why are you such a conservatives? 69.67.93.35 (talk) 11:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Do you think calling the Foundation for Moral Law a bunch of "bigots" is liberal? I call it one-sided bias. I'd love to change Donald Trump's lead to "Donald John Trump (born June 14, 1946) is a racist, misogynistic jerk whose most redeeming feature is that there is likely to be a point in the future where he is dead and I am still alive", but our neutrality and verifiability policies prevent this from happening. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:31, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

The Apprentice

Hi. I'm User:The brave celery under an IP and I'm the one who made that original edit about "The Apprentice". This makes sense to me because, unless they want to do it with another host, Mr. Trump will be incredibly busy, and Arnold Schwarzennegger (spelling?) has "refused to do another season". On the celebrity apprentice page, you'll see (and this one was not added by me) that is says that show has effectively been cancelled.

Thank you very much, no hard feelings intended, best wishes 50.32.153.192 (talk) 14:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

The Shapeshifters Edits

Hi There, Yes I am new to this what did I do wrong!!! :) I don't think anything I wrote was not fact. while I am here would love to change that very old image but having difficulties. Can you help? Thanks for your time, Simon Marlin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonmarlin (talk • contribs) 14:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Again Oshwah

Sorry for not clarifying previously. I manage the artist, Olof Corneer - I do not manage the article.

Here are some references from reliable sources that support the changes requested in regards to changing the name from Olle to Olof;

Please let me know if you have any questions and thanks again for your help!

Tobybenson (talk) 17:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Edit Approval - Olle Corneer

Hi there,

I manage Olle Corneer (

Olle recently changed his public name from Olle to Olof and I wanted to have his Wiki reflect the change.

Here's some references <ref>https://www.facebook.com/olofcorneer</ref> <ref>https://twitter.com/olofcorneer</ref> <ref>https://www.instagram.com/olofcorneer/</ref> Could you please help me rename his Wiki page and change the references from Olle to Olof.

Thanks! Toby Tobybenson (talk) 15:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Tobybenson, and thank you for leaving me a message here with your request for assistance. Sorry, but I don't believe the sources you provided are considered reliable to meet the requirements stated in Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people. You also state that you "manage" the article - this concerns me. It sounds like there are conflict of interest issues here - something you really shouldn't be finding yourself crossing into. I suggest that you review this guideline and let me know if you have any questions. To answer your question -- content that is added to an article that's a biography of a living person must be referenced by a reliable source. Please review these policies very carefully and let me know if you have questions. Thanks again for leaving me a message, and I wish you happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello,

Sorry to clarify I manage the artist, Olof Corneer (rather than manage the article).

Here are some references from reliable sources that support the changes requested in regards to changing the name from Olle to Olof;

Please let me know if you have any questions and thanks again for your help!

Tobybenson (talk) 18:46, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

References

Changes to the Sloths band page

Hey man. I Mike Rummans, am the founding member of The Sloths band. What more reliable source can there be than me? I'm merely trying to update this page. Don't you want Wikipedia to be as accurate as possible? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C584:C210:3D98:B82A:15F0:6003 (talk) 15:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC) 2602:306:C584:C210:3D98:B82A:15F0:6003 (talk) 18:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi there! I responded to your follow-up message below. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Bro

Hey I wrote that on Victoria secret page becuse Mia Malovich(Maxswell) is a new one in Victoria modelss😊 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maksimax123 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Yes it was a mistake. Thank you for restoring it!

Thank you for restoring it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blaze 007 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

No problem :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

No subject

Let me know why you keep reverting my edits that are in no way disruptive. I'm working on the reception, and release of Getter Robo Armageddon, as well as including some more notes about the staff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.136.14.124 (talk) 17:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, and thanks for leaving me a message with your concerns. I see that you're making changes to the article over a series of edits. I saw a few individual edits that, by themselves (and not realizing that you were making many edits together), were concerning because you didn't explain what you were doing and why using an edit summary. You had removed content, removed a section, and referenced a source that seemed to be a blog. However, since you're making a series of changes, I'm going to revert the content I removed - I apologize for any frustration or confusion. Moving forward, you should add an edit summary with each of your changes so that other editors understand what youre doing and why. If you need anything else, let me know and I'll be happy to help you. Cheers :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Oh sorry didn't mean to vandalise. I had a bunch of text copied on notepad, and planned to paste it all back in. The reason for the blog sources is that they're the best you got. The original sources are lost (Like Gunota for the interview), and I'm pretty sure they're accurate, given some of those info are repeated on other Japanese blogs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.136.14.124 (talk) 17:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Seeking help regarding ssb NCC spl entry examination

Sir I am sathish thirupathi....and I am graduate in agriculture and I can know English moderately ....can u help me to crack ssb — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:70C6:968C:1A6:8BB8:8E4B:4FA3 (talk) 17:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Which SSB are you talking about? If you could tell us which SSB you are talking about, then we should be able to help you. Also, what do you mean by crack? Thanks! RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 21:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

The Sloths edit

Why didn't you respond to my message? Is it because I didn't leave four tildes ? 2602:306:C584:C210:3D98:B82A:15F0:6003 (talk) 18:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi there! I apologize; I'm trying to stay caught up with my messages but I'm still quite behind. I had concerns that the content you modified and updated here wasn't referenced or supplied in the references listed alongside them. If it is, then please feel free to revert my edit and restore the modification. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns and I'll be happy to help you out. Best -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

I should also add to my response and make sure that you understand that your editing of the article represents a clear conflict of interest with the article subject. Per Wikipedia's guidelines on this situation, you should refrain from making edits to such articles and focus on other articles that interest you instead. As I said above, feel free to let me know if you have any questions about the guideline I referenced you here. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

A pointless edit

There seems to be no point to this edit. Why would anyone care if a rollback link shows up there? Anomie⚔ 19:19, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Jaredgk2008 vandalism

Hey, Oshwah. I recently found a sock of Jaredgk2008 (SPI), and, where there's one, there's usually another. Going through the range contribs for one of the IP ranges he used, I found you reverted an IP sock in this edit. If you're unfamiliar with him, he's a serial BLP vandal who likes to write fanciful yet highly defamatory hoaxes about celebrities. One of his trademarks is using the name "Firooz Oskooi" gratuitously in his hoaxes. If you see anyone add BLP violations with that name attached, you should probably block on sight without sock tags (per WP:DENY). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Editig Rawlplug Ltd.

Hi Oshwah, I've been asked to help with a wiki page for Rawlplug Ltd. as part of my University project related to family-owned businesses. Initially the task was just to tidy an old wiki up but I offered to change it into a piece of text that reflects better what this company actually does and they kindly offered a small compensation for my time. I see now that I made an error admitting that whilst seeking advice on how I should proceed with changing the article's title from Rawlplug Ltd to Rawlplug. I don;t quite understand how and where I should make a statement about the fact that my relationship with the Rawlplug company was part of the university project and any compensation for my time was just to cover my costs. I did not make any profit on creating a Wiki about Rawlplug. I see that I've managed to make a couple of other editors quite angry and that was not my intention. In the future, I will also remember about providing explanations for any edits in the articles I may decide to create. Many thanks for your help in advance:) jowita ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jowita ch (talk • contribs) 19:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Kurt edit

If I add the references can the information be on the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gullwolf (talk • contribs) 20:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

River of Blood (monument) page

You left a note on my talk page regarding edit warring on the River of Blood (monument) page. The user, "I am One of Many" is continuously editing this article to push a partisan point of view by adding superfluous information that is not relevant to the article's subject. I am editing the article to make it view point neutral by removed the superfluous / incorrect information and the user "I am One of Many" keeps adding back. That user needs to be stopped from continuously editing the page because they are flagrantly and repeatedly violating the neutral point-of-view rules. Plain Information (talk) 20:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Salut vieux

C'est parce que t'as pas d'affaires. Moi je voulais pas me faire achaler mais toi tu es un sombre imbécile. Ma poésie a été défigurée. Mange de la marde. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.162.67.167 (talk) 20:38, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Bonjour! Notre politique concernant les personnes (WP:BLP) dit nous ne pouvons jamais dire quelque chose au sujet des personnes sans ressources. Merci! RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 21:25, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Just so you know...

The previous block on this IP address was for 1 month (although that block was awhile ago), and no edits since then have been constructive at all... 172.58.46.149 (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

I made some edits and they were deleted.

Hello, I am new to this, but I figured out what I was doing wrong and posted some edits to the AT&T Stadium page and the NRG Stadium page. However, someone named Lander deleted them and I can't figure out how to message them. I am guessing they are an admistrator like you. The edits I made were not for advertising, per say. My company built the fields and installed the turf at the two stadiums and they should be noted on there. How can I get my edits to be added without being deleted?

Hello! If you can find a reliable source to support your statements (like a newspaper or something like that), then you should be able to add it in one sentence. You should just say who installed it, and nothing else. There isn't more needed. Also, there should never by external links in the body of an article. If you are having trouble citing your source, then see this page. Thanks! RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 21:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Re: I made some edits and they were deleted

I am confused. Like I said this is new to me. I am having a hard time moving around the pages and finding my previous submitted note.

You said to read a certain page and I went there but I didn't see anything that was related to my posts on AT&T Stadiumm and NRG Stadium.

````Katrina — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksuits (talk • contribs) 21:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

What I'm saying is that you have to change your edits to get them reinstated. To do that, you have to cite reliable sources to support your claims. Also, you should not say things about the company, like it being trusted. In all honesty, one should be able to say that they installed the turf in one sentence. I linked you to the page I did just in case you did not know how to source your edits. Thanks! RileyBugz<sup>会話</sup><sub>投稿記録</sub> 21:40, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

I made another edit. I am hoping its ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksuits (talk • contribs) 21:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

You say you can't have links, but there are links for a bunch of things in the body. Minnesota Vikings, NRG Energy, Reliant Energy, Act Global are all links in the body. I don't understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksuits (talk • contribs) 21:56, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

What I mean is that you can't have external links (links that are just blue with nothing else are ok). If it has a little box with an arrow and it is in the body, then it is not ok. RileyBugz<sup>会話</sup><sub>投稿記録</sub> 21:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Ksuits! Forgive me - I saw these edits here and here, and thought that you were testing the use of ref tags. My reversion also appears to have removed the content you added. I apologize for the confusion. Please let me know if you have any questions or need my assistance with anything - I'll be happy to help. Best -- ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 22:06, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Can you tell me if I added information correctly now? I want to make sure I do it right. I am curious also, how can I create a page for my company Hellas Construction so people can look us up if they want to find us? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksuits (talk • contribs) 22:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello

Buttcheek ( )( ) just kidding, ok thanks for telling me that i was wrong. my little brother who is 28 said that while i was researching him so i guess he was wrong. bye, have a good day :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.132.8.79 (talk) 23:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

User talk:Team GS

Could you revoke TPA? –72 <sub>(talk)</sub> 00:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

72 -  Done. ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 00:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Could you do User talk:Audio Excursion too? –72 <sub>(talk)</sub> 00:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

72 - Way ahead of you ;-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 00:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Edit on Sachin Gupta (musician) 42.111.35.76 (talk) 11:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Our edit was reverted though the earlier information is incorrect.. please suggest a way forward

Well, you removed sourced content and replaced it with content that was speculative and unreferenced. Perhaps start a discussion on the article's talk page if you feel that this edit is justifiable - I think others should weigh in before such a removal is performed. ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 15:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Did you know ?

Hello,

In French, Oshwah is pronounced /oʃwa/ like au choix. That means ″whichever you prefer″ ;-)

Gabriel 185.24.185.195 (talk) 12:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Awesome! Today I learned! :-D ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 15:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

About the Berisha Tribe

Hi Oshwah, I forgot to leave an explanation. Sorry about that.

However, about this part: "Many Islamized Serbian families in Kosovo entered the fis of Berisha. In 1967 it was recorded that Romani families in Podrima and in the Đakovica srez are under the fis of Berisha, as they are the most powerful in that region,[29] while Magjupi[where?] are under Berisha or Gashi.[30]"

This is 1. NOT a reliable source and 2. fabricated. There are too much of these fabricated stories from the serbian side. Trying to lable the albanian nation as a "bunch of gypsies, mixeed nation". It's ridiculous. Serbias goverment is known for labeling all kind of ethnic or religion groups, minorities (such as Vlach, Romas, Albanians, Muslims, Boshniaks, Turks, etc) as "gypsies". An example: my grandfather was not killed by serbs - just (!) because he had darkblond hair and blue eyes. He was declared as "an albanian with possibly slavic origin". So they let him go. There are books (written from serbian authors) where it is stated that census in Kosovo was based on appearance. Ppl with dark hair were declared and labled as "turks", "gypsies" etc. Ppl with light brown, blond hair were declared as ppl of "slavic origin". How they self-identifies was not even a question. This is called albanophobia, discrimmination and census falsification. It's a fact that the albanian nation is the most homogenous nation in entire balkan. Serbian goverment needs to back up with such fairy tales and anti-albanian propaganda. Not to mention that these ppl who entered albanians fis (tribe) did not call themself "serbian" but sandjak and entered mainly muslim fis, or dominant muslim fis. They were not orthodox. And there are many of them in Turkey. They still self-identify as "sadjak". And it's not uncommon that they have part albanian ancestry. even 300 years ago it was considered as a shame for the albanian fis to intermarry with orthodox (aka "shkije"). Basically: marriage with Serbs = exile, leave the tribe. Pls do your research.

As for the Romas (btw. magjup is offensive): Marriage and contact with this ethnic group was a bigger taboo than a marriage with a serb. Let aone a fis-inclusion. Romas were not under albanian tribes, it's not accepted today and for sure not back then. Especially not in the region around Gjakova. Romas were the last one to be accepted under an albanian fis. I know the region around Gjakova and the fis very well. I have both tribes (father and mother) very well documented. However, the roma ppl were not "under albanian fis" - but were infact always among themselves. There was a small circle of romas near our tribe (about 15 min.). They came from the north and asked if they can settle down near our village. These roma ppl were invited in albanian villages only during weddings, as musicians. For Christmans or Bajram (neighbour village is dominant muslim) it was something like a "tradition" in our region to bring food or sugar to these roma ppl. These romas left before the KS war started. There were already wars happening. Romas had obvious distance from regions populated by Albanians. There were some albanian fis who chased away romas, but there were also fis wo tolerated roma ppl in the region. It was mainly a decision that the tribesman made. but like I said, they could not enter or live with albanians, for example not in the same village, and they were not included to fis. Till to this day marriages with roma ppl are a taboo. Not only in the albanian community, but pretty much all over Balkan. Mixing with romas is seen as "against the moral". Romas do in fact also avoid marriage with non-romas. Trying to keep their community together and not to assimilate into foreign culture. There is in fact a Paranoia problem in Balkan. Ppl still fear the extinction of their own kind, culture and language.

However, this is a page about an albanian tribe - and serbian "theories" or "sources" cannot be tolerated here. serbian sources like this are for a FACT not neutral. something like "Zivot i običaji narodni, Srpski etnografski zbornik, Srpski etnografski zbornik" ... clearly NOT a source and telling , once again, fabricated stories.

It is only fair to demand neutral sources. Pls remove. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.162.106.227 (talk) 15:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

If you feel that the content isn't accurate, or if it isn't properly referenced by reliable sources, you're of course okay to challenge and remove the content. But you need to explain why you're removing it by adding an edit summary. This helps other editors to understand what you're doing and why. Do this, and you're all set :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 15:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

i don't l — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.203.190.139 (talk) 17:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Zetron Page Edits

Hello,

My name is Jim, I work for Zetron, and I am the person who recently edited the Zetron page. The information that was deleted refers to an unsubstantiated claim (there is no reference to it). And actually, I was going to look into requesting that the Zetron page be taken down (per my boss' request).

Please feel free to contact me with questions.

Best Regards,

Jim Wornell (jwornell@zetron.com)

67.50.118.9 (talk) 18:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

The section you removed here is referenced, so I don't understand why you're saying that there isn't one. And requesting a page be taken down because someone from the company doesn't like it? That's not how it works here. Our deletion process outlines how it works :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 18:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

making changes to Matt Oswalt wikipedia page

this is the actual Matt Oswalt trying to make the mistakes someone wrote on my wikipedia page but can't seem to do it. thanks for any help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blender6615 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello good sir you are gravely mistaken in changing my edit. Corn will come for you, it shall get its revenge!!! Our corn god shall rule us all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.102.54.113 (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Can you add more to IXL page

IXL is really frustrating and is making me and other students mad. Please don't make the wikipedia page for this awful website that you pay for seem all great, its not. Please add in a part to its that says the public view of IXL. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.31.4.89 (talk) 22:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Can you add more to IXL page

IXL is really frustrating and is making me and other students mad. Please don't make the wikipedia page for this awful website that you pay for seem all great, its not. Please add in a part to its that says the public view of IXL. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.31.4.89 (talk) 22:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Copy writing mistake

Hi so i didn't mean to copy right anything so you can delete the part about the link but plz keep the rest thx! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simplynailogical (talk • contribs) 22:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Lewiston, ME

I have verified with the Jessica that the Lewiston contributions are 100% true. She has asked that it be fixed ASAP. However, should this prove not possible at this time, we completely understand, and apologize for the inconvenience.

   Sincerely,  
           VexJackal  — Preceding unsigned comment added by VexatiousJackal (talk • contribs) 22:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC) 

Tyler Hynes Edit

Hi there. Glad there is a way to talk to you. I have been contributing to Tyler's page for years. I am his family and manage his affairs. I am now dealing with this for the second time. Tyler's religious affiliations are his own and not for Wikipedia. This is his private life. He has helped with Church Campaigns years ago but this is old news. He does not want any religion stated under personal at all. This is not good that it keeps coming up. Wikipedia is suppose to be for information on an individual but ethnic issues and religious issues and political issues do not belong there especially if stated that it is not wanted otherwise. I keep removing it and it keeps being put back on. Would like your help in resolving this issue.

Thanks alot

BettyBetty robichaud (talk) 22:59, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Mohamed El-Erian edit

Hi there! You sent me a message regarding an edit I made with no citation, you said you removed it, could you identify what the edit was by any chance so I can add the citation? I'm doing several edits for Dr. El-Erian so it would be great to know which one I forgot to cite. Thanks! Sjbae75 (talk) 23:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Sjbae75! The edit I saw was this one, but I now see that you followed up with additional edits that were completely fine. I restored the page and the changes you made. Sorry for the confusion :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 23:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Ok great! Thanks Oshwah! Saved me from sticking a needle in my eye! ;) Sjbae75 (talk) 23:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Manipulation Under Anesthesia

I removed two sections as they are now incorporated into other sections. The first section on hip replacement is now covered in the first well-referenced section on extremity manipulation. The external link to one article gives undue emphasis to an article above other more current and more thorough reviews. I also made numerous additions of reference citations that had been marked as needed. I also edited grammar and corrected headings.

All of the changes were lost when you placed the eliminated sections back. If you can revert it back to what I had just done it would be greatly appreciated.

I am new at this so I would also appreciate your assistance for knowing how to better communicate what I am doing so the changes will be accepted. I am being very careful and working with another doctor to make sure that everything that is placed in here can be backed-up 100%.— Preceding unsigned comment added by CritCred (talk • contribs) 23:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Disruptive editor

Job Labasan has once again reverted other editors, over multiple pope articles, in an attempt to add unsourced information.

Do you want to handle this or should I file an SPI, since Kimley Labasan, Kim Labasan and three IPs49.147.191.157,49.147.183.110,119.93.41.213, all appear to be doing the same edits. --Kansas Bear (talk) 03:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

• Hold on, I'm on it. Drmies (talk) 03:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
• Kansas Bear, here's what you do: file that SPI, under the oldest account. Add the IPs--the two 49 IPs are old (and stale) but they are important--what you're arguing is that this is a long-term disruptor who's been doing the same thing over and over again. Mention that Kim Labasan and Job Labasan are a perfect CU match: I just confirmed that. Here's the catch: they don't overlap, and it could be a lost password--I can tell you that I found such a suggestion in the log. Now, I blocked that Kim account in early September and left a comment somewhere, saying the same thing I'm saying here: if there is no overlap it's not easy to argue there is abuse of multiple accounts. At that time I think I confirmed the two K accounts; you can find it in my history of that day, if it's important. Then, the next admin should decide if all these accounts should be blocked and if the "sockpuppet" label should be slapped on it. At the very least you'll have an SPI you can point to next time. OK? Drmies (talk) 03:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

School bus vandal

Thanks for protecting School bus. You may need to protect the Talk page as well. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 03:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

The Punisher TV Series Page

This is not vandalism to the page, please contact me if you need further info- [REDACTED] - OSHWAH Thanks!

Mochiethedog - Well... then what the heck was this about then? lol ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 14:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Please contact me at my email address listed. Thanks!

PS- just so you know, those black bars are design elements but if makes you feel better, will write it out a different way

Mochiethedog - Conversations regarding article content, your account and behavior, and things regarding Wikipedia - need to stay on Wikipedia. This keeps open discretion and public viewing of these discussions. My question still stands: what was this edit about? You should also read this guideline on spoilers (assuming this is what you were trying to avoid doing). SPOILER ALERT - We spoil :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 14:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

What?????

Why'd you delete my edit? Not cool. That man is like a god in this city.

Not testing

Hi I wasn't testing just try to add another useful link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cycle Gladiator (talk • contribs)

Cycle Gladiator - It looked like a test to me. Forgive me if I was incorrect on this. ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 15:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Edit on Frank Iero and The Patience

As far as I'm aware, their old alias used to be stylised as frnkiero andthe cellabration, not frnkiero and the cellebration. It's only a small mistake, but after I fixed it it was removed.

Sports

I can to expand articles regarding Italian sports: I explained in edit summary. I can translate from --Nonhosoldi (talk) 16:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

• Hey Osh, just here to notify you that the relevant edits are at Pallone col bracciale and Pallone. The redirect has been replaced with the content remove from Pallone. No idea what the appropriate response is. Mr rnddude (talk) 16:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Mr rnddude - Ah, that makes a bit more sense now. Nonhosoldi - Thanks for the message, and I appreciate your explanation. Please let me know if you have any questions and I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers ;-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 16:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

My intention is to translate article which has a list of Italian sports and other related sports in several nations. Pallone col bracciale and Pallapugno are important and historical sports with several famous professional champions: related article needed and no redirect to Pallone! May you to restore my edit in Pallone?--Nonhosoldi (talk) 17:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Change to Anal Haq

I'm not sure how correcting the spelling of the title of a story to match the transliteration used for the title of the article is an "nonconstructive edit".

198.246.186.211 (talk) 18:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I just realized that you were fixing it, not vandalizing. My apologies. ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 18:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

No worries!

198.246.186.211 (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Article fixed - thanks for leaving me a message and for letting me know :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 18:02, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

68.65.62.240 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

I wanted to let you know that this IP is mis-utilising their privilege to edit their talk page even though they are blocked. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Pkbwcgs -  Done. Talk page access revoked. Thanks for letting me know :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 19:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Let me have some fun lmao

1922 Setting Change

Hi there,

I noticed you reversed the change I made to the 1922_(novella) wikipedia entry. The article states in multiple locations that the novella is set in Nebraska, not Nevada, as it states in the category at the bottom of the page. Please change the category "Novels set in Nevada" to "Novels set in Nebraska."

If you must have a source for this, here's one: http://stephenking.com/library/short_story/1922.html

Thanks.

Another edit: Nevermind, I changed it myself but included what changes I made as a note.

Hey, thanks for the message and for letting me know. It looks like you just reverted the change back, so all looks good from here. If you have questions, let me know. Cheers :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 20:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Isabella Cramp

Hello- I am Isabella's mother. I have been trying to correct her name. Her birth name is Isabella Veneranda- Patricia Cramp however her stage name is Isabella Crovetti. She started out using Cramp then if you look at her credits in Colony and Magic camp she is now Crovetti. Please change her name on Wikipedia. Also can you add her credits Shimmer and Shine Colony Magic Camp And Vampirina I have been trying to change this and you keep changing it back. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denisecrovetti (talk • contribs)

Hi Denisecrovetti and thanks for leaving me a message here. Sorry, but editing a page where you have a conflict of interest is a behavior that's not encouraged by the community. This is due to the inability for those users to maintain a neutral point of view with their edits. Any content added can also be cited as original research, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia articles. Original research is content that's referenced off an editors personal experience, relationships, findings, and references (even if its published). You can also call it "citing yourself". This is not allowed because such content cannot be verified for authenticity or accuracy. Please review this policies and guidelines, as they are very important. If you have questions about them, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them. Thanks for understanding :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 20:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Steam (software)

Hi Oshwah, thanks for your positive bias regarding Steam. It's nice to know your neutrality guarantees the abuse of others. Have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:c7d:722e:f900:3d9f:1265:153d:e4c6 (talk) 20:45, 22 September 2017‎ (UTC)

Hi! I need help

this is Michael Hernandez youtuber from Dominican Republic. sorry for the delay on Michael Bair page. Please can you help me to create Michael Hernandez page there is no Michael Hernandez biography on wikipedia and I am trying to create it, I am the artist Michael Hernandez.

I am Michael Hernandez

I need help with my biography on wikipedia Michael Hernandez is a youtuber and singer from the Dominican Republic that does not have a wikipedia bio. Mhmusik (talk) 22:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi Mr. NINNY (hey, you said it yourself, multiple times), thank you for your question at my RfA. It was certainly an interesting one to answer. Cheers, ansh666 22:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Ansh666 - It is true and I can confirm that I am a ninny. You're welcome, and congratulations - seriously. You did a hell of a lot better percentage-wise on your RFA than I did on mine... lol ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 22:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Which I seem to recall opposing ;) ANYWAYS thanks and I'm sure you're not actually that bad :) ansh666 22:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Whelp, you certainly weren't the only one... lol. And you bet - I'm sure you've been offered this numerous times, but if you have any questions or need input, advice, anything... my talk page is always open to you and you are welcome here any time if you need something. Congratulations are in order, and I look forward to seeing you on the admin battlefield ;-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 22:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

User talk:2606:6000:FD0A:FB00:4979:D4EE:59ED:79D0

You may wish to revoke TPA. –72 <sub>(talk)</sub> 22:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

I guess you beat me to it again – the joys of slow internet ;) –72 <sub>(talk)</sub> 22:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

72 - It's all good, dude! I'd rather you say something and find out that I already beat you to the punch than to say nothing at all. Thanks again for being on the ball with this stuff :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 22:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Rare video of the "Oshwah" blocking vandals (colorized) Jiten Dhandha • talk • contributions • 23:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Jiten Dhandha - HA! Nice. The video, unfortunately, misses the part where I accidentally drop the gun... haha ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 23:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

It looks like someone got your goat.

I see this is the third time you've been blocked (accidentally) but the first time you've blocked yourself. I'm glad you were able to unblock yourself. I hope the rest of your day goes easier.

Chris Troutman (talk) 23:10, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Chris troutman - HAHAHA God damnitttt!!! I used my script to try and block... *COUGH* an obvious sock puppet account that was just redacted. Apparently I had the wrong diff page open when I used it... LOL ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 23:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Everyone in #wikipedia-en is now flipping me major shit... which I don't blame them for doing... lol. Thanksssss :-P ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 23:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

At least you got a pic of a cute goat out of it O. Enjoy your weekend. MarnetteD|Talk 23:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

MarnetteD - That indeed is true! Enjoy yours as well! Mine just started an hour ago :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 23:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Well congratulations on blocking yourself. But it in no way compares to my slip up of when I was removing an entry from the title blacklist and left a .* in there, thus blocking everyone but administrators from creating articles.—CYBERPOWER (Message) 00:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

This seems to be a suicide threat

[REDACTED - Oshwah This] might need to be revdelled. WP:999 have been notified. Adam9007 (talk) 00:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

And [REDACTED - Oshwah another one]. Adam9007 (talk) 00:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Adam9007 - Deleted. Please report both diffs to the emergency team if you haven't already. Let me know if you need me to do anything else. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 00:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Please report both diffs to the emergency team if you haven't already I've already done so. Adam9007 (talk) 00:46, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Adam9007 - Awesome. Rock on, dude :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 00:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

I should probably mention that that's what I meant by WP:999 have been notified. Maybe I should be clearer in future? Thanks for deleting them. Adam9007 (talk) 00:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Adam9007 - Ah, no you were clear about it. I am just stupid and read it as a question instead of a statement... lol ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 00:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Too much personal info for a juvenile?

See [REDACTED - Oshwah here]. Btw, given the user's comments there on being a "a former WikiVandal who has reformed", and edit history, this is probably User:GoFlamesGo. - BilCat (talk) 01:09, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Adam9007 - I'm erring on the side of "yes"; it's rev del'd and I'm contacting an oversighter to have it suppressed. In the future, if you think it needs suppression, contact an oversighter directly ;-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 01:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Did you ping the wrong person? Adam9007 (talk) 01:34, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Yup, but I'm watching! I wasn't even sure it needed rev-del, so I asked first. I'll keep it mind for future incidents. - BilCat (talk) 01:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

ACK! Sorry Adam9007! BilCat - I'm glad you were watching ;-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 02:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Web hosting or just silly?

Hi,

I've just seen User:Polyhistoric/sandbox, and figured out what the encoded description says: it reads "Pop culture and history editor" (I had a hunch about what the code was and I was right). I understand it, but do you think it's possible for someone to mistake this as web hosting or vandalism? Adam9007 (talk) 01:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

The reason I ask is because if it was in mainspace, it would probably be G1d, and I can imagine scenarios where someone would take one look at it and think, "what the hell is this?" and U5 or MfD it or something. Obviously, I don't want that to happen if it's perfectly legitimate. Adam9007 (talk) 01:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Adam9007 - Hey man, I apologize for missing this message on my talk page. I've been busy lately and I'm just now catching back up with everything. Do you still need help with this? This looks like someone just being silly IMO... ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 00:13, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

It's the sort of thing I might have done if I wanted to be really silly. I had a hunch as to what it (the code) was and I was right. But others who would not understand it would probably think differently and nominate it for deletion or something. Adam9007 (talk) 00:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

It's true that someone may nominate it, but hopefully someone attentive will see the difference. If you still have concerns about this, you can certainly add a dummy edit to explain so that others know. I'm sure there's a way to do something like this in order to save others' time... :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 10:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Not sure about this user page

Hi again,

I know editors may put statements about themselves in their userspace, but do you think [[REDACTED - Oshwah|this]] is WP:999-worthy? Also, is it grossly offensive? At first, I thought "gay faggot" was a contradiction in terms (how can a faggot be gay?), but now I'm not so sure. Or is this just trolling? Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 02:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Adam9007 - This is a G10 situation, not a threat of violence. They were attack statements toward someone else with the intent of messing with their reputation, it was not a threat to directly hurt anybody. That being said, if you disagree at all and think it may imply direct violence, you should disregard my advice and report it no questions asked. Let me know if you still have questions and I'll be happy to answer them. ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 02:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Let me know if you still have questions and I'll be happy to answer them Well, there's the one above this . Now I come to think of it, I'm not sure it was entirely appropriate to give the decoded statement, but I can't see how else I could prove my "I understand it" statement. At least I didn't give the solution away: that really would have spoiled it. Adam9007 (talk) 03:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

All set and answered ;-). Sorry for the delay in doing so. ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 10:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

NAME CHANGING DISPUTE

MY CHANGE ON HYDERABAD BOMBINGS ARE CORRECT CONSTRUCTIVE AND GENUIN THE TWIN BLASTS REALLY HAPPEND IN DILSUKNAGAR IAM RESIDENT OF TELANGANA STATE IKNOW MY STATE GEOGRAPHICAL BOUNDARIES VERY WELL BELIVE ME IF YOU CHANGE ANY MY EDITS ON THAT PARTICULAR PAGE I WILL DEFNETLY REVERT YOUR EDITS SO DONY CHANGE MY EDITS TRUTH HAS TO BE KNOWN TO THE PEOPLE— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:648a:9513:5ce5:88ff:fe5d:5c7c (talk • contribs) 08:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

(talk page gnome) @2405:204:648a:9513:5ce5:88ff:fe5d:5c7c: please see WP:EXPERTS, WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, its contents should therefore summarize what reliable sources say. Original research and synthesis (WP:OR and WP:SYNTH) are not acceptable. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 08:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The article lead clearly states where the incidents happened. Please do not type in capital letters. Please sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 08:43, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Current UTC time

Hi, I believe I saw a screenshot of WP that you posted a while back that had the current UTC time in the top right. Was this a script, and if so, could you pass it on? I know of no way to find the UTC time efficiently now that they've changed up the watchlist interface. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@Anarchyte: Preferences -> Gadgets -> Appearance second one. Dat Guy<sup>Talk</sup><sub>Contribs</sub> 10:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

@DatGuy: Oh, now that is brilliant. Thank you! Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Please restore my correction of The River King.

Hi Oshwash, You recently reverted a correction I made to the River King (Movie) page. I corrected the plot summary which in no way reflected the story of the film. This was written by someone trying to sabotage the page - that's why I removed it and added a plot summary that truly and correctly reflects the story of the film. If you have seen the film you would see that I am right. For example the first sentence of the sabotaging plot summary reads: "Abel Grey (Edward Burns) goes with Charlin Leander (Rachelle Lefevre) and Betsy (Jennifer Ehle) goes to the house in Nova Scotia Canada and then goes in the house and has a group of king army's and then kills them and then leaves the house and kills them outside and then takes Charlin to an interview and then Abel goes in his house and then sleeps and then takes a break." Abel Grey doesn't kill anyone in the film. In fact the only correct thing in that sentence is the character's name Abel Grey. Everything else is gobbledigook. The summary continues throughout with the same mad rambling inaccuracies. So please, if you're concerned that Wikipedia is genuine, reinstate my correction which reflects the ACTUAL plot of the film. Dinkydarcey (talk) 10:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Dinkydarcey

As proof here are two roughly correct synopsis on IMDB

References

FTR

You obviously have some kind of personal vendetta against me. I've no idea why and I don't care. Just know that I'll consider you to be WP:INVOLVED in any future actions you should take against me on your "admin battlefield". Joefromrandb (talk) 10:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Manipulation Under Anesthesia Table on incorrectly quoted journal articles

The table that details incorrectly quoted MUA journal articles was removed. The table was very well referenced. The table served a purpose as a Google search for MUA produces numerous personal websites that misquote the same articles.

It would be very helpful to understand why the table was removed. It would also be good to know if there is something that could be done to return the table as it is useful/reliable information for the reader. CritCred (talk) 13:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

CritCred - Hi there! I apologize for the delay returning your message. I saw this edit you made and thought you were removing these sections. I see that you also made a bunch of edits previously in a row, and that I reverted all of them. Did you still need help restoring what I changed? ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 10:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

A user called “Sagrika14” is making personal attacks in edit descriptions and purposefully reverting fixes that promote vandalim and false info.

Please see the page history of the Durga article. There’s kinda an edit war that’s going on right now. ShotgunMavericks (talk) 07:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi ShotgunMavericks! I apologize for the extremely long delay with responding to your request. Life has been extremely busy lately, and I'm just now catching up with inquiries. It looks like the warring has since calmed down, but definitely let me know if you still need my help with anything and I'll be happy to do so. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 10:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

360 video edit

Hi,

I noticed that you reverted my edits to the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/360-degree_video

Your response mentioned that I did not adequately explain my edits. I apologize, as I am not a common editor of wikipedia entries - I've edited maybe 3 since wikipedia began - and I also thought that my edit was actually self-explanatory.

Google Cardboard is a joke product. Referencing it in a serious manner on a serious subject page is simply bad. It provides fodder for those who argue that Wikipedia is not a serious reference site. I don't understand at all how a reference to "Google Cardboard" as a serious "technology" could be accepted by the wikipedia community.

Please reinstate my changes.

This is what the edit shows: 01:29, 22 September 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-1,124)‎ . . 360-degree video ‎ (Google Cardboard entries clearly joke entries.) (Tags: references removed, Visual edit)

Can you please suggest a better phrasing for the edit comment then, since that was not an adequate explanation?

I believe that the edit summary you added with the edit you made here explains your point of view, sure. However, it does not adequately explain why the content should be removed and why the reason is in-line with Wikipedia policy or a discussion between editors that come to a consensus stating that it should be. This is why I reverted the edit you made and with the reason I stated - your explanation was not adequate. ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 10:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Racking up quite the block log, aren't we?

[8] LOL. Softlavender (talk) 03:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Sigh... yes. Yes, I am.... *Oshwah facepalms at himself* ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 10:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Still looking for some help...

@Oshwah: Hi Oshwah - Apologies for continuing to bug you about this. And apologies for editing on your talk page (apparently, since I got two messages about that!). Please see below (next section) to review my earlier question that you so generously agreed to help with. I believe the history still should be restored to the "new" Neil Gross page but, unfortunately, the Draft: Neil Gross page (where the history was) no longer seems to be available. I was going to just go ahead and request the merge (and probably get yelled at for doing it wrong :-)) but now I'm wondering if it is too late. If possible, please tell me what I should do next or if I should take this question elsewhere. Thanks! 1stCoastal (talk) 04:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

1stCoastal - Hey, sorry again for being so late to the party with responding to messages lately... life was very busy these last four weeks... I hope that the responses I provided you in the section below was helpful. Let me know if you need anything else and I'll be glad to help you out :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 10:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Bah! It looks like you're still in need of assistance. I'm looking at this now. Again, please accept my apologies for such a long delay with getting back to you. It's truly unacceptable and I should have either helped you sooner or referred you to someone who could have helped you sooner... :-( ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 10:38, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

New user page mess :-(

Reposting - Hi there, Oshwah. You were recommended to me by another editor who said you were of great help to them. I'm hoping you can help me get something straightened out. The story - I was working on adding some content to a page for Neil Gross. I copied the existing page into a sandbox page but, being new, failed to include the correct information at the top to let others know what I was doing. To be honest, I never expected anyone to even LOOK at my sandbox. A well meaning and more experienced user (Comatmebro) decided to take my sandbox page and make an article page from it, adding the subject's middle name. The new page is Neil Luis Gross. When I saw this I let Comatmebro know that there were now two pages for the same person with the same content (seems they would have realized this). They then made the original page into a draft page (Draft:Neil Gross). the Draft page has all of the old history since creation on 1/24/14 and the new one only has history since that page was created on 7/10/17. Since this happened another editor added a new section to the Neil Luis Gross page. So, what I think needs to happen is that the Draft page needs to be restored to being an article page with the new section from the Neil Luis Gross page included and the Neil Luis Gross page needs to eventually be deleted. I really have no idea how to do any of these things. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide! 1stCoastal (talk) 04:57, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

U can just redirect the one page 2 the other 172.56.13.9 (talk) 04:58, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi 1stCoastal! Sure, I'll be happy to lend you a hand and help you out. I see that Neil Gross exists, but I don't see that Neil Luis Gross exists, nor are there any logs of its deletion. I'm looking through Comatmebro's contributions, but I don't see the edit for the page creation. Can you point me to the location of the duplicate page? I'll be happy to take a look and help you from there :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 02:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

1stCoastal - Ah, I see now. The Neil Gross page now redirects to Neil Louis Gross. You should be able to add the content from your sandbox now that it's merged and in one place. Let me know if you need any more help, and I'll be happy to do so :-D ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 02:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, Oshwah. The Draft:Neil Gross page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft%3ANeil_Gross), created in 2014 by Brainy J, is actually the original page as it existed before I touched it and has all of the history from before that time. The Neil Luis Gross page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Louis_Gross) started out in my sandbox as a copy of the original page and was mistakenly (but with good intentions) moved to article space by Comatmebro on 7/10/17 (with the addition of the middle name "Luis") and does not have all of the history. I don't know how to "undraftify" the draft page and, since the newer NLG page has a number of edits since it came into being, I don't know how to combine the two pages to preserve 1) the history from what is now the draft page and 2) the history from the new edits on the NLG page. Hope this is more clear and thanks again for your willingness to help!1stCoastal (talk) 04:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

@Oshwah: So I'm hoping you will still be able to help me with this :-) as it is a dilemma. If I add my new content to the NLG page, it won't have the early history from the original page. If I add the content to the Draft:Neil Gross page it will have the history but not the other new content that other people have added to the NLG page. My understanding is that they somehow need to be merged. I know I can't do that and at this point I don't even know what to ask for. Thanks again (I hope). 1stCoastal (talk) 05:09, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

@Oshwah: OK, sorry if I'm being a pest (and please let me know if that is the case). I really don't see what is supposed to happen at this point (maybe you don't, either?). Should I add my additional content to the draft page (Draft: Neil Gross) and then request a merge with the Neil Luis Gross page? :-) 1stCoastal (talk) 03:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

1stCoastal, don't ever think that you're being a pest by asking me questions or doing what you feel is right for the project. I won't ever bring you down in that way and make you think that :-). Since the Neil Gross page is already published, you can just add the additional content to that page. Just make extra sure that any content you're adding is referenced by a reliable source since this article is a biography of a living person. Drafts are simply meant for those who need help creating a new article on a subject that doesn't yet exist. Since the article exists already, you don't need to go through that extra step ;-). Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Please accept my apologies for the late response, by the way. Life kept me busy recently and I'm just now catching up on my emails and messages. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 19:06, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

1stCoastal (talk) 04:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

1stCoastal - Okay, so in a nutshell... according to your description above, it looks like that you copied the content from Neil Gross to Draft:Neil Gross to expand it before you added your changes to the live version, and in the middle of expanding and improving this copy in the draft, it was copied from your draft and to another article (it's actually spelled Neil Louis Gross; Neil Luis Gross is empty and has no history). So it sounds like (according your description) that you believe that we now have three articles that are out of sync (and therefore out-of-whack). Okay, no big deal. We can resolve this no problem.

Looking at the Neil Louis Gross article, I see that it has since been moved to Neil Gross. I checked the deleted edits of Neil Gross and Neil Louis Gross, and I see an entry that says that Comatmebro moved Neil Gross to Draft:Neil Gross back in July. Then afterwards, it was copied to Neil Louis Gross, which was then moved back to Neil Gross. WHEW... Okay. So it looks like we just have two pages we need to merge the histories with, not three. Everything was done correctly up to the point that the content was copy-and-paste moved from Draft:Neil Gross to (what ultimately is now) Neil Gross - which is what we just need to fix now. I'll get the histories merged and let you know when it's done. ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 11:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

1stCoastal - Okay... it looks like I've gotten most of the histories merged from Draft:Neil Gross to Neil Gross with the exception of two edits that were made outside the latest revision in the draft and the oldest revision in the live article... yay. I'll just need to go back and merge those in manually. I'll swing back around and get that part done after I finish up with some other tasks that have priority. Again, I sincerely apologize for how long it took for me to respond to your request for help and get this done for you. Life has kept me busy, and I let your request slip through the cracks and that was my fault. I hope you understand. Let me know if you need anything else and I'll be happy to do give you a hand :-) ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 11:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

User page issues

See here, and previous edits. I'm sure this isn't allowed, so I'm asking. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 00:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

(talk page gnome) reported at WP:AIV for now, thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 01:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

I should have written "paranormal activity on user page" though... —PaleoNeonate – 01:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

@BilCat: has been deleted but not answered to, as an apparently stale report ([9]). It may be that those who process the queue waited until more edits occurred, but since it wasn't declined that's unclear. Oshwah will probably see this when he returns to evaluate what should be done, if anything. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 03:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Psychonot

The two IPs you recently blocked for making problematic edits at Bret Hart were pushing the exact same edit[10][11] made by the still-unblocked User:Psychonot,[12] who was in turn pushing the exact same edit that confirmed User:Mangoeater1000 sock, User:Eliken, made back in April.[13] In other words, Psychonot is not only a sock of the IPs you blocked, but a blatant WP:DUCK sock of LTA troll Mangoeater1000, and could do with blocking. Should you need to be further convinced, consider that Psychonot's recent edits include changes to articles about pro wrestling, Bollywood, New York educational institutions, and Middle Eastern political topics, all of which are well-established hotspots of Mangoeater1000. Cheers. 2A02:C7F:8E0C:6600:2042:5CA1:44DE:7A7B (talk) 04:06, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello Oshwah. The IP who commented here might have thought to tell you about a parallel discussion on my talk page. See User talk:EdJohnston#Psychonot, where two different editors are accusing one another of being socks of LTAs. One option would be to file Psychonot at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000 and see what checkuser says. The IP who posted here is hopping within a range. You can see the whole /64 of their contributions at this link. Psychonot says the IP who has been disputing with him is a sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The abominable Wiki troll/Archive. One of the Wiki troll's IP ranges is this /24 which was blocked by User:JamesBWatson on 28 September. There was also this abortive 3RR complaint which was removed by User:SkyWarrior as block evasion. Other admins probably know more about one or both of these editors (Mangoeater, Wiki troll) than I do. 14:36, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I asked Oshwah because he was directly involved. I asked for your help, but you sided with glaring sockpuppet Psychonot because he has an account. By the way, I edit from a shared access point within student accommodation, so you might want to think twice before blocking that Sky range (at the advice of a blatant Mangoeater1000 troll, no less) and denying multiple people the chance to edit. 2A02:C7F:8E0C:6600:C32:5F1:297C:D897 (talk) 15:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Does any part of this prevent you from notifying Oshwah of discussions you have been involved in elsewhere, under different variations of your IP? EdJohnston (talk) 15:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

An i.p address is making useless/test edits everyday on the same article. Spam maybe?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/Ganesh_Chaturthi

Check it out. The user keeps changing a spelling of a word and immediately changes it back. This has been going on now for 3 days I assume, Could you like block or warn him please? ShotgunMavericks ❯❯❯   🕊✍🏻 09:59, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) ShotgunMavericks: I see you haven't warned any of the IP addresses on their talk pages. I'll do so for you, but may I recommend you install WP:TW? It definitely makes anti-vandalism work easier. :-) Patient Zero<sup>talk</sup> 10:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

ShotgunMavericks - Interesting... I'm going to hold off for now but let me know if things get out of hand and I'll take another look... ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 04:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Another Spartan Race conspiracy IP

Hey there, you most recently blocked an IP that's been whinging about being greatly wronged over the history of the Spartan Race brand for several years. You blocked them when they left [REDACTED - Oshwah] on my talk page, but they're back with more BLP-violating allegations at Talk:Spartan Race. I'm clearly involved; could you take another look? Cheers. Ivanvector (<sup>Talk</sup>/<sub>Edits</sub>) 02:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Ivanvector - Yes I can. ~Oshwah~<sup>(talk) (contribs)</sup> 04:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)