User:Pigeon4253275
BIO
[edit]About Me
[edit]Hello everyone, Amber. I am from Washington State, born and raised. I absolutely love being with my family and being near any body of water, especially here in Washington. It brings solace to my life and peace and tranquility. I also really enjoy driving to random places, not even planned, with my music loud in my car. I'm going to school, that's why I'm taking this course to become a medical assistant. And if that doesn't work out, I hope to be a child protective services agent. 'Findings indicate that having at can help to diminish feelings of loneliness, particularly for women living alone, and compensate for the absence of human companionship."[1]
My Wikipedia Interest
[edit]My interest in Wikipedia is the fact that there is more to do as a stnt or a user then any other knowledgeable site. I just learned you can edit Wikipedia which I've known about Wikipedia for my whole life basically but had no idea that we could change anything or have any influence in information provided to the world basically. I find Wikipedia very interesting simply because it's one stop shop basically. You pick a topic and it's got different articles and facts and relevant subjects all in one page I had no idea that it was so informative and easy to use at the same time. I'm excited to be able to expand my knowledge in many different top
Heading text
[edit]ics and subjects as well as contribute to the ones that I find the most interesting by simply putting my input in my influence into it.
- ^ Zasloff, R. L.; Kidd, A. H. (1994-10). "Loneliness and pet ownership among single women". Psychological Reports. 75 (2): 747–752. doi:10.2466/pr0.1994.75.2.747. ISSN 0033-2941. PMID 7862783.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)
Evaluation
[edit]Introduction
[edit]I chose the article about the Oso Mudslide memorial because I have a personal connection to the subject. I lost my house and acreage in that devastating slide. I want to ensure that the information provided in the article is accurate and reliable. Therefore, I will be focusing on three aspects: A. Are each fact and statement supported by a reliable source? B. Are there any irrelevant sentences or sections that can be removed? C. Are any of the links in the article dead or broken? By addressing these questions, I aim to contribute to the accuracy lpand quality of the Oso Mudslide Memorial article.
Body
[edit]Well-Produced Facts and Statements
[edit]The article presents well-written and contains truthful facts and statements regarding the Oso Landslide Memorial. It states the location of the memorial and where it's situated along State Route 530 and the Whitehorse Trail in Snohomish County, Washington. It goes into a couple different avenues of detail in regards to the timeline of beginning to end of the Oso landslide memorial. It starts at the begining pwith the first stages of the planning making readers well aware that project was announced and made by the Snohomish County Department of Parks, Recreation & Tourism as well as when planning began which was on March 22, 2018. There's also details in the timeline form from when the planning began to when it ended as well as included where the funding came from. The article includes references which shows and proves credibility
Irrelevant sentences or sections that could be removed
[edit]In my search I found that the article effectively conveys relevant information about the Oso Landslide Memorial, there are certain sentences or sections that can be removed due to its irrelevance. For instance, the paragraph found under the "External links" section as it doesn't directly pertain to the Oso slide memorial.
Inoperative or defective links
[edit]I found that all the provided references are fully functional and active so reliable sources, which allows readers to obtain more information about the slide and people involved in it and why the also landslide memorial is being built or was even thought of.
Conclusion
[edit]So after reading and exploring the page that I chose I would give this page a rating of an a+. The reason I give it that is because it does provide a vast range of different articles cites And all of this those are accurate and alive. They've taken articles from news pages to other newspapers to people and they have provided us one page with all of the information. And I know this and can verify this because I personally was involved in the also months slide so all of the information that they provided is accurate and true.