User talk:Pkukiss

Bullshit (expletive)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bullshit (expletive), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Bullshit. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created, such as with Bullshit, have been considered disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 02:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Liguanjie constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. RainbowOfLight ^Talk 07:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. —slakr^\ talk / 02:09, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Red Link

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Red Link, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Useless cross-namespace redirect.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — FIRE!^{in a crowded theatre...} 22:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Red Link

Speedy deletion of Sandbox of Pkukiss

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Skarl 07:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pkukiss listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User:Pkukiss. Since you had some involvement with the User:Pkukiss redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 10:15, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 16:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikkkipedia" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Wikkkipedia. should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 21#Wikkkipedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Hog Farm (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Fucq" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fucq. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 29#Fucq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. b uidhe 00:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"USA 911" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect USA 911. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 12#USA 911 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 12:49, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]