Jump to content

User:RStoakes/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
LIST OF CHANGES FROM ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Parks & Adelman and Planalp & Honeycutt were missing in the reference list despite being put in the text and not cited. These citations have been added.

Defense[edit]

Eleven years after uncertainty reduction theory was introduced, Berger published Uncertain Outcome Values in Predicted Relationships: Uncertainty Reduction Theory Then and Now. His aim was to defend his theory in new contexts and modify it, as necessary. Berger later proposed three types of information seeking behavior: passive (watching the interactant for clues in reactions to stimuli), active (posing questions to other individuals about the interactant), and interactive ( posing direct questions to the interactant).[1] Later research by Berger and Bradac (1982) indicated that disclosures by interactants may lead them to be judged as more or less attractive.[2] The judgment will determine whether the judge will continue to reduce their uncertainties or end the relationship. Berger also acknowledges the works of Gudykunst, et al. (1985) and Parks & Adelman (1983) to extend uncertainty reduction theory to the realm of more established relationships.[3]

Planalp & Honeycutt (1985)[4] studies the introduction of new uncertainty to existing relationships. Their findings indicate that uncertainty in long-term relationships usually impacts negatively on the relationship.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Miller, K. (2005). Communication theories: Perspective, processes and contexts (2nd ed). NY: McGraw Hill, 176-183
  2. ^ Berger, Charles R., and James J. Bradac. Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relations. E. Arnold, 1982., pg. 7
  3. ^ Berger, C. R. (1986). Uncertain Outcome Values in Predicted Relationships: Uncertainty Reduction Theory Then and Now Human Communication Research, 13, 34-38
  4. ^ Planalp, S., & Honeycutt, J. (1985). "Events that increase uncertainty in personal relationships." Human Communication Research, 11, 593-604.

Further reading[edit]

  • Berger, C. R. (1986). "Uncertain Outcome Values in Predicted Relationships: Uncertainty Reduction Theory Then and Now". Human Communication Research, 13 (1), 34–38.
  • Griffin, Em. (2012) A First Look At Communication Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Deyo, J., Price, W. & Davis, L. (2011). Rapidly Recognizing Relationships: Observing Speed Dating in the South. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 12 (1), 71-78
  • Flanagin, A.J. (2007). Commercial markets as communication markets: uncertainty reduction through mediated information exchange in online auctions. New Media & Society, 9 (3), 401-423
  • Koester, J., Booth-Butterfield, M. & Booth-Butterfield, S. (1988). The Function of Uncertainty Reduction in Alleviating Primary Tension in Small Groups. Communication Research Reports, 5(2), 146-153
  • Ramirez, A. (2009). The Effect of Interactivity on Initial Interactions: The Influence of Information Seeking Role on Computer-Mediated Interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 73 (3), 300-325
  • Witt, P.L. & Behnke, R.R. (2006). Anticipatory Speech Anxiety as a Function of Public Speaking Assignment Type. Communication Education, 55(2), 167-177
  • Gudykunst, W. B., Shapiro, R., "Communication in Everyday Interpersonal and Intergroup Encounters," International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 20, 1996, pp. 19–45.


Category:Interpersonal communication