Jump to content

User:Robevans123/sandbox/GWR 5700 Notes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(local government) community

[edit]

Looked at how the neighbours deal with the problem of "parish" which can mean a civil parish or an old or current ecclesiastical parish.

Ponthir (Welsh: Pont-hir) is a large village and local government community in the county borough of Torfaen.

Ponthir (Welsh: Pont-hir) is a large village at the south-west of the county borough of Torfaen on the boundary of the city of Newport, Wales. It is approximately six miles from Newport city centre and 3½ miles from Cwmbran, lying between the settlements of Caerleon and Llanfrechfa. Ponthir is also a local government community and part of the electoral ward of Llanyrafon South for Torfaen.

Accessibility notes

[edit]

Notability

Wikipedia:Notability (Railway lines and stations)

Not a travel guide - agree that wp is not a travel guide - but - many station descriptions provide an overview of services, often including frequencies of services and routes, operators, and a selection of destinations (often an area of contention on the amount of detail to be included - which is another area where a guideline might be useful...), so again I can't see why at least some mention of

Sewta Rail Strategy 2013 Final Report

[edit]

Quick summary of contents. And a ref:[1]

Table of Contents

[edit]

Executive summary

Section 1 Introduction 1

Section 2 Policy Context 3

Section 3 Rail Context 13

Section 4 Sewta Rail Strategy 23

Section 5 Strategy Delivery and Programme 32

Section 6 Rail Strategy Costs and Outcomes 40

Section 7 Recommendations for Further Work 42

Appendix A Summary of Capacity Analysis Issues

Appendix B Summary of Rail Freight Issues

Appendix C Network Capacity / Operations Review

Appendix D Summary of Engineering Reviews

Appendix E Summary of Scheme Appraisals

Notes

[edit]

Ebbw Vale Railway:


Precision

[edit]
The precision of a measurement (or definition) is not determined by what it is you're measuring but how accurately it is measured (or defined) - although the object of the measurement will often give a good indication of how accurately it is likely to have been measured.
For a measurement reported as a single digit, the idea of significant figures completely breaks down is sort of true (technically speaking it does have one significant figure, and it might have more) but incomplete: the same can be said of any whole number with trailing zeroes: for example, 1,000 (miles) has only one significant figure.
The only way to be completely sure of the number of significant figures is if the number has been given:
  • in scientific (or engineering) notation: 1.000×103 (1,000) miles has four significant figures, but 1.0×103 (1,000) miles has only two significant figures
  • or using another method of indicating significant figures, such as a bar above or below the least significant figure: 1000 has 3 significant figures, but 1000 only has two significant figures
  • or the source (as mentioned above) says something about the accuracy and precision of its own figures
the big problem is that many (a large majority of?) sources give little or no indication of the precision of the figures given (accuracy is another thorny issue...).
As already said good sense and good judgment have a large part to play, and it is always worth looking at any other figures given in the source. If the source gives a distance as 1,000 miles, but also gives other distances as 1,263 miles and 1,579 miles then you can be reasonably sure the figure of 1,000 miles has four significant figures
However, it is important to have a reasonable understanding of significant figures (they don't just apply to single digits but to what might be rounded numbers), and that single digit figures may often have more (implied) significant figures.
I still contend that the statement in the MOS Small numbers may need to be converted to a range where rounding would cause a significant distortion, so one mile (1–2 km), not one mile (2 km). is profoundly misleading, and is probably the basis of statements like "technically, 5 ft should be converted to 2 m" and should be changed.

Appraisal

[edit]

Notes from Red Panniers book.[2]

  • "Connecting Communities - expanding access to the rail network" (PDF). London: Association of Train Operating Companies. June 2009. Archived from the original (pdf) on 29 July 2013. Retrieved 20 February 2015. {{cite web}}: External link in |deadurl= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

Individual loco histories

[edit]

Not sure what their sources are but they put 1933 as n/a a lot. They must have been looking at a general shed allocation doc and not the individual loco sheets.

L89 (5775)

[edit]

Page 159 from Scott-Morgan and Martin (Red Panniers)

5775 history
Date GWR/BR Shed allocation
1929 Into service at Neath
1930 Neath; Glyn Neath (Dec)
1931 Details
1932 Details
1933 n/a
1934 Details
1935 Neath and Neath & Brecon (alternating)
1936 Details
1937 Neath and Neath & Brecon (alternating)
1938 Neath and Neath & Brecon (alternating)
1939 Neath and Neath & Brecon (alternating)
1940 Neath and Neath & Brecon (alternating)
1941 Danycraig
1942 Danycraig
1943 Danycraig
1944 Danycraig
1945 Danycraig
1946 Danycraig
1947 Danycraig
1948 Danycraig
1949 Danycraig
1950 Danycraig
1951 Danycraig
1952 Details
1953 Details
1954 Details
1955 Details
1956 Details
1957 Pontypool Road
1958 Pontypool Road
1959 Pontypool Road
1960 Pontypool Road
1961 Pontypool Road
1962 Pontypool Road
1963 Pontypool Road

L90 [2] (7760)

[edit]

Page 161 from Scott-Morgan and Martin (Red Panniers)

nnnn history
Date GWR/BR Shed allocation
1929 Details
1930 Details
1931 Details
1932 Details
1933 Details
1934 Details
1935 Details
1936 Details
1937 Details
1938 Details
1939 Details
1940 Details
1941 Details
1942 Details
1943 Details
1944 Details
1945 Details
1946 Details
1947 Details
1948 Details
1949 Details
1950 Details
1951 Details
1952 Details
1953 Details
1954 Details
1955 Details
1956 Details
1957 Details
1958 Details
1959 Details
1960 Details
1961 Details
1962 Details
1963 Details
1964 Details
1965 Details
1966 Details
1967 Details
1968 Details
1969 Details

L92 (5786)

[edit]

Page 164 from Scott-Morgan and Martin (Red Panniers)

nnnn history
Date GWR/BR Shed allocation
1929 Details
1930 Details
1931 Details
1932 Details
1933 Details
1934 Details
1935 Details
1936 Details
1937 Details
1938 Details
1939 Details
1940 Details
1941 Details
1942 Details
1943 Details
1944 Details
1945 Details
1946 Details
1947 Details
1948 Details
1949 Details
1950 Details
1951 Details
1952 Details
1953 Details
1954 Details
1955 Details
1956 Details
1957 Details
1958 Details
1959 Details
1960 Details
1961 Details
1962 Details
1963 Details
1964 Details
1965 Details
1966 Details
1967 Details
1968 Details
1969 Details

L94 (7752)

[edit]

Page 166 from Scott-Morgan and Martin (Red Panniers)

nnnn history
Date GWR/BR Shed allocation
1929 Details
1930 Details
1931 Details
1932 Details
1933 Details
1934 Details
1935 Details
1936 Details
1937 Details
1938 Details
1939 Details
1940 Details
1941 Details
1942 Details
1943 Details
1944 Details
1945 Details
1946 Details
1947 Details
1948 Details
1949 Details
1950 Details
1951 Details
1952 Details
1953 Details
1954 Details
1955 Details
1956 Details
1957 Details
1958 Details
1959 Details
1960 Details
1961 Details
1962 Details
1963 Details
1964 Details
1965 Details
1966 Details
1967 Details
1968 Details
1969 Details

L95 (5764)

[edit]

Page 167 from Scott-Morgan and Martin (Red Panniers)

nnnn history
Date GWR/BR Shed allocation
1929 Details
1930 Details
1931 Details
1932 Details
1933 Details
1934 Details
1935 Details
1936 Details
1937 Details
1938 Details
1939 Details
1940 Details
1941 Details
1942 Details
1943 Details
1944 Details
1945 Details
1946 Details
1947 Details
1948 Details
1949 Details
1950 Details
1951 Details
1952 Details
1953 Details
1954 Details
1955 Details
1956 Details
1957 Details
1958 Details
1959 Details
1960 Details
1961 Details
1962 Details
1963 Details
1964 Details
1965 Details
1966 Details
1967 Details
1968 Details
1969 Details

L99 (7715)

[edit]

Page 171 from Scott-Morgan and Martin (Red Panniers)

nnnn history
Date GWR/BR Shed allocation
1929 Details
1930 Details
1931 Details
1932 Details
1933 Details
1934 Details
1935 Details
1936 Details
1937 Details
1938 Details
1939 Details
1940 Details
1941 Details
1942 Details
1943 Details
1944 Details
1945 Details
1946 Details
1947 Details
1948 Details
1949 Details
1950 Details
1951 Details
1952 Details
1953 Details
1954 Details
1955 Details
1956 Details
1957 Details
1958 Details
1959 Details
1960 Details
1961 Details
1962 Details
1963 Details
1964 Details
1965 Details
1966 Details
1967 Details
1968 Details
1969 Details
  1. ^ Jacobs UK Ltd (March 2013). "Sewta Rail Strategy 2013 Final Report" (PDF). Sewta. p. 1. Retrieved 11 March 2015.
  2. ^ ATOC - Connecting Communities, p. 17.