User:Salimfadhley/spam
sozcu.com.tr[edit]
- Link
- sozcu.com.tr: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- aksam.com.tr: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- www.haberturk.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- Spammers
*Keivan.f (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
I've noticed that this user has been adding obviously spammy sourcs to Draft:Yurdaer Okur, such as: [1], [2], [3].
A machine translation shows that these three pages have almost identical content and appear to be machine generated text from the same source. --Salimfadhley (talk) 19:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Salimfadhley: Get your facts straight. The article is merely a translation of the page on the Turkish Wikipedia, I haven't changed a single word of it. Go check the history of that page if you wish. Also, the sources you listed, Sözcü, Akşam and Habertürk, are all Turkish national newspapers. I'm not responsible for their content. Take your issue somewhere else and have them listed on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources through general consensus if you have a problem with them. As long as they are not considered unreliable by the community they can be used. Keivan.fTalk 19:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- I've noted this on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard as suggested. --Salimfadhley (talk) 20:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Salimfadhley: Good. And I have replied there. Though I didn't really enjoy being listed as a spammer on your user space, but I understand your concerns. I think a general consensus regarding the websites of these newspapers will help with resolving the issue. Keivan.fTalk 20:29, 28 November 2021 (UTC)