User:SandyGeorgia/sandbox/Archive 1
< User:SandyGeorgia | sandbox
Hang on[edit]
See here. This section of my sandbox is a chronology of events needed for dispute resolution in two cases, which users are allowed to keep in user space. User:Wehwalt alleges it is an attack page. It is a record of events that will have to be reconstructed for dispute resolution if removed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I have declined the speedy. Sandy, if you don't use this for DR in the next week or so, please courtesy blank the section. Indeed, it would be cool if you courtesy blanked it anyway, just to de-escalate whatever you two are up in arms about. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'll accept that, but it is very ugly conduct on her part and I am considering an AN/I thread.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Wehwalt, please see "de-escalation" comment immediately above. I'm fairly sure an ANI thread would not result in deletion of this page. Ditto for MFD. Still, both are, of course, your prerogative. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'll really need the chronology if the issues don't subside soon (particularly the socking and the accusations of abuse of power and collusion), but I suspect it's the questions that Wehwalt is bothered by (and it doesn't appear he will be answering them, at any rate). The chronology of events here is extremely complex, and tracking them in one place will be helpful if these issues don't subside. Would deleting the questions satisfy you, Wehwalt? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete the whole section, please. You can always retrieve them. No one is asking for them to be oversighted.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I need the chronology for dispute resolution; and it has been declined as an attack. Again, is it the questions that trouble you? If so, I'll delete them.[1] What is your issue with the chronology of diffs? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- In the interest of not escalating a conflict provoked by you that may spill over to FAC and other areas, I will accept that. For now. As Floquenbeam suggested, I expect that you will either have taken it to DR or deleted the remainder of the section within one week. If that is not the case, we can have a do-over.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:52, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Flo said one to two weeks; I certainly hope the allegations and insinuations will stop before that, and no further DR will be needed. I don't anticipate any effect on FAC, but I'm unhappy to see allegations and insinuations aimed at undermining FAC by questioning the integrity of both FAC delegates. I do hope that will stop, soon. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Can't resist the little insinuations and attempts to claim that you are not really defending yourself, but someone else as well? How noble. Karanacs is perfectly capable of defending herself and asking me to address any grievances, she does not require your defense. Very poor, Sandy. Very poor indeed. As the five people who have queried your conduct in the past week would attest to.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:02, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'd caution you against taking Storm Rider's attack too seriously, and be aware that sometimes what you don't know can hurt you when you assume. In your case, I'm more concerned about the allegations and insinuations. If they stop, this chronology won't be needed. Soon, I hope. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- OK, so that leaves four. Nice try to attempt to make yourself look like the injured party.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- If you're done now, I need to get back home, where I only have a slow dialup connection for now. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:12, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- OK, so that leaves four. Nice try to attempt to make yourself look like the injured party.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'd caution you against taking Storm Rider's attack too seriously, and be aware that sometimes what you don't know can hurt you when you assume. In your case, I'm more concerned about the allegations and insinuations. If they stop, this chronology won't be needed. Soon, I hope. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Can't resist the little insinuations and attempts to claim that you are not really defending yourself, but someone else as well? How noble. Karanacs is perfectly capable of defending herself and asking me to address any grievances, she does not require your defense. Very poor, Sandy. Very poor indeed. As the five people who have queried your conduct in the past week would attest to.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:02, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Flo said one to two weeks; I certainly hope the allegations and insinuations will stop before that, and no further DR will be needed. I don't anticipate any effect on FAC, but I'm unhappy to see allegations and insinuations aimed at undermining FAC by questioning the integrity of both FAC delegates. I do hope that will stop, soon. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- In the interest of not escalating a conflict provoked by you that may spill over to FAC and other areas, I will accept that. For now. As Floquenbeam suggested, I expect that you will either have taken it to DR or deleted the remainder of the section within one week. If that is not the case, we can have a do-over.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:52, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I need the chronology for dispute resolution; and it has been declined as an attack. Again, is it the questions that trouble you? If so, I'll delete them.[1] What is your issue with the chronology of diffs? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete the whole section, please. You can always retrieve them. No one is asking for them to be oversighted.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'll really need the chronology if the issues don't subside soon (particularly the socking and the accusations of abuse of power and collusion), but I suspect it's the questions that Wehwalt is bothered by (and it doesn't appear he will be answering them, at any rate). The chronology of events here is extremely complex, and tracking them in one place will be helpful if these issues don't subside. Would deleting the questions satisfy you, Wehwalt? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Wehwalt, please see "de-escalation" comment immediately above. I'm fairly sure an ANI thread would not result in deletion of this page. Ditto for MFD. Still, both are, of course, your prerogative. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'll accept that, but it is very ugly conduct on her part and I am considering an AN/I thread.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Per this discussion, chronology of events removed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC)