Jump to content

User:Seabuckthorn/sandbox (GAN analysis template)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • 1: Well-written:
In what ways does this article pass 1a, and what 1a problems exist?
Are there problems with the lead? With the layout? With the other sections listed above?
Do you see any significant problem with the "References" section?
Are there any statements that need to be sourced, but aren't? Are any of the sources unreliable or problematic?
Do you see any evidence of original research?
  • 3: Broad in its coverage:
Are there aspects to this article that should be covered, but are missing?
  • 3b: it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
Does the article go into unnecessary detail into any aspect?
  • 4: Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Does the article have neutrality problems? Does it fail to mention any notable POV?
  • 5: Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is the article suffering from an edit war?
There are no images in this article. Is that a problem?
  • Other aspects...
Are there any other things you'd want to bring up in this review?