User:Shovon76/Archive 3

Spamming eh?

The link given has legitimate relevance to the Northeast India, in case if you have not noticed. I hope you have taken the time to see the website and see if it is relevant to Northeast States. For any person trying to know about Northeast India or any of the states, he/she would like to know of external links that would provide more information. However I respect your endeavor to stop spamming. I am all for stopping spamming. Ingudam (talk) 16:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

babur

and you think ranges of the missile is in the thousands ? shows what you know about missiles.

Re:Pakistan-Administered Kashmir

Hello,

Thanks for your note on my talk page. That was an improvement. Regards Pahari Sahib 17:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Singur

Please do not delete external links to news arachives from the pages on Singur and Nandigram. They are an important set of links. —Precedingunsigned comment added by Dibyajyotighosh(talk • contribs) 06:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Development Dialogues is not a personal website. It is a public archive. —Preceding unsigned comment added byDibyajyotighosh (talk •contribs) 12:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Please see

Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding the eXile anduser:Dsol]]

24.127.162.147 (talk) 22:10, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

How about now? evando

Speedy deletion

Regarding the page GL1TCHG0R3, which you tagged for speedy deletion with the reason "an article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject", I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This page does not qualify for speedy deletion because the article claims that the band released two albums on the notable record label Some Bizzare Records, which is an assertion of notability. If you still want the page to be deleted, please consider tagging it with a speedy deletion template which does apply, redirecting it to another page, or using theWP:AFD process. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 13:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the reason I had tagged it speedy was a Gsearch for the exact term did not return any meaningful results. Even if I search for GLITCHGORE, Google seems to throw up only some Youtube and Myspace links. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 13:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

That's fine, but for an article to be speedily deleted under criterion A7, it must lack even any indication as to why the subject may be notable. The threshold is lower than the threshold for inclusion, and I would encourage you to use one of the other deletion processes if you feel the article shouldn't be included on Wikipedia. Stifle (talk) 13:17, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Jammu and Kashmir

Did you even bother to read the source before reverting my edit? Please, refrain from such unproductive behavior. --Dilli Billi (talk) 06:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Oops.. I'm very impulsive by nature and when I get hyper, I don't think before typing and hence the bad choice of words and spelling errors. But had you elaborated the reason for revert in the edit summary, this situation wouldn't have arisen. --Dilli Billi (talk) 21:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

i sure appreciate you upholding a neutral point of view

if i waz a admin i would give u a defender of the wiki barnstar Btzkillerv(talk) 15:07, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

? neautrality

why on earth did you delete it so you dont want to talk fine86.154.149.34 (talk) 16:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Also your claim of NPOV doesnt mean anything when India POV is clearlt stated on the article on Indo-Pak conflicts which is leaning towards india point of view with sentences such as "backfired" and "raiders" please end your hypocrasy86.154.149.34 (talk) 16:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Longewela

if you look at the battle of chawinda it first stated that pakistan won then suddenly the indian editor nichalp changed it and slapped on the tags of disputed and altered the whole article without consensus if the battle of chawinda is not restored to it stable neutral point there will be problems 86.154.149.34 (talk) 15:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Are you issuing threats? Shovon (talk) 15:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

threats ? whats so threatening about it please explain before making false accusations again86.154.149.34 (talk) 16:38, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

You mentioned consensus: Consensus is only possible if both partys agree to one. When Nichalp took himself to put these POV tags on the battle of chawinda where was the conensus i urge you to change the battle chawinda to its normal NPOV state and warn nichalp not to change without consensus on issues such as kashmir or wars which will always result in a cyber war cheers86.154.149.34 (talk) 20:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

PAK

also if you look at the PAK page it is tagef POV over pakistans veiw which is only a few lines long and the excuse for it is a map thats pathetic while the indian veiw is long and clearly more POV than the pakistan one p.s nice picture 86.154.149.34 (talk) 15:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

please stop deleting valid sourced information from Battle of Longewala keep your nationalist veiws in India please 86.156.208.40 (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I don't take orders from a banned user. (Others, may seeUser:Nangparbat)Shovon (talk) 15:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

im not nangparbat fine no justice no peace 86.156.208.40(talk) 16:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

So, is it User:S3000? Shovon (talk) 21:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

India quiz

Hi Shovon, Just a reminder, it's your turn to ask a question in the India Quiz. --Longhairandabeard (talk) 04:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Aulogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Aulogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:Rfa

Hello :-)

A belated thanks for your offer on my user page. To be honest it is not something I have thought about and I don't think I know the ins and outs of Wiki yet :-) Also I have been ridiculously busy lately (and still am) - so will not be spending that much time on wiki - not the best time for this. Thanks for the kind offer though :-) Sorry for the late reply, regards Pahari Sahib 11:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

86.151.125.184 et al. have been reported for a 3RR, 4RR, and 5RR

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#86.151.125.184_reported_by_Thegreyanomaly_.28Result:_.29

If you want to bring up if he is a sock puppet for anyone, now is the timeThegreyanomaly (talk) 21:34, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

memo

just wanted to let you know i reverted ip edit on states of india he or she removed the correct note that jammu and kashmir is disputed territory so i suggest you dont go in guns blazing and state im vandalizing unless you want trouble? —Preceding unsigned comment added by86.162.66.35 (talk) 18:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Greetings From Anil Aggrawal, India.

Dear Shovon, What a beautiful surprise you gave me by wishing me Deepawali Greetings! I along with my wife Aparna and son Tarun wish you and your family a very very happy Deepawali. May you get everything in life you ever desire for. Warm regards Anil Aggrawal, Aparna, Tarun

October 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Wars and conflicts between India and Pakistan, you will be blocked from editing.[[User:86.158.238.215 (talk) 09:39, 29 October 2008 (UTC)]] ([[User talk:86.158.238.215(talk) 09:39, 29 October 2008 (UTC)]]) 16:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Really? I have reported you to the Administrators. Please feel free to voice your opinions over there. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 12:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

The resultant effect. Shovon (talk) 15:42, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

IP vandal

If you believe the IPs are an attempt from a blocked user to avoid the block, you could always post a checkuser request. --Bonadea (talk) 11:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

raja1020

mr. shovon my original edit was that the fighting was going back and forth I do not denie that muslims attacked hindus and sikhs. —Precedingunsigned comment added by Raja1020 (talk • contribs) 15:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

raja1020

if you have read the 1947 ino-pak war before i edited it you would see that the whole article was cleverly biased towards india. and pakistan did win,imean pakistan was going to get 0% of kashmir. By the end of the war the had 2/5 of it. azk forces and pakistani troops were right outside srinagar,it was so bad the maharaja fled kashmir and jawaharlal nehru called for the u.n. to make a ceasfire. how is that not a pakistani victory? —Precedingunsigned comment added by Raja1020 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

My response. Shovon (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

raja1020 reponse to responce

Where is the evidence that tribesmen,azk forces,pak soldiers etc. commited arson and rape? my grand mother live in skardu she said that the maharaja's and indian troops executed her father and burned down her house. i have evidence,wheres yours? —Precedingunsigned comment added by Raja1020 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

raja1020 response to responce to responce

mr.shovon please lets stop going back and forth until we go into a full-fledged cyber-war happy late deepawali. khuda hafiz. Also happy early diwali —Precedingunsigned comment added by Raja1020 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Sen

YES. Pls see Wikipedia:Single-purpose account.-Bharatveer (talk) 05:10, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

License for Image:PuneFC Team.JPG

Your Image:PuneFC Team.JPG

Move to commons representation

The image PuneFC Team.JPG is a candidate to becopied to the Wikimedia Commons. When you uploaded this image, you licensed it for use under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). On behalf of the Wikipedia and Commons communities, thank you. However, the GFDL requires that reproductions of the image (and any other GFDL-licenced works), must be accompanied by the full text of the GFDL. The GFDL is intended more for documentation and not images, so downstream re-users may be hindered by additional restrictions of the GFDL which may not work well on the use of one image.

Before I copy this image to the Commons, I wanted to ask whether you would be willing to multilicense your work under an additional license, such as a Creative Commons licence. Creative Commons licences, such as the Attribution Share-Alike license provide a similar copyleft permission to the GFDL, but without some of its requirements such as the distribution of the licence text. All you need to do, is place the additional license tag alongside your current license. Users can choose between which one they want to use the image under. There aremany free licenses accepted on Wikipedia and Commons which can provide freedoms similar to the GFDL, but without some of its requirements.

You are under no obligation whatsoever to alter the license. Doing so merely cooperates with those members of the community who believe that multilicensing your work can ease the reuse of images outside of Wikipedia.

If you use a GFDL license tag which requires distribution of Wikipedia's general disclaimer (indicated by "Subject to disclamiers" in the template), it is also suggested that you switch it to one which does not apply them.

Whether or not you choose to dual-license your work, thank you for your consideration.

Please also see Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons for more information. This message was placed using Template:Dual-licence.

Also Affected:

• Image:PuneFC Senior Squad and Staff.jpg

Thanks! --Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Binayak Sen

Shovon, Please see Binayak Sen, SPA is back again.-Bharatveer (talk) 13:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Shovon, Didn't you notice that SPA's edit completely removed cited sentences ( especially Sen being an activist of a political party).-Bharatveer (talk) 11:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Battle of Longewala. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please stop your POV pushing and vandalising of articles concerning Pakistan. [[User:86.162.68.35 (talk) 19:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)|86.162.68.35 (talk) 19:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)]] ([[User talk:86.162.68.35 (talk) 17:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)|talk]]) 11:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Funny! Isn't it really a copy-paste job of a warning I had posted here? Come on, at least be original. Shovon (talk) 18:53, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue tovandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Chawinda, you will be blocked from editing. [[User:86.162.68.35 (talk) 19:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)|86.162.68.35 (talk) 19:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)]] ([[User talk:86.162.68.35 (talk) 19:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)|talk]]) 18:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chirag logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Chirag logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Reverted your edit

Hi, I reverted an edit of yours at Kargil War. Please see Talk:Kargil War for the justification. AshLin (talk) 07:03, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

shovon is biased towards india

mr. shovon after reading your talk pages and your "contributions" i have realized why your a newpage patroller. YOU want to power to make sure that you can disrupt the facts to make it biased towards india. you have silenced the voices of any pakistani users that make a Fact that is not pro-india that is why i've reported you to the adimnistators. have fun.Raja1020 (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

My response can be found here.Shovon (talk) 19:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Kargil War

Hi Shovon,

Why do you feel that the "Pakistani troops disguised as Kashmiri secessionists, militants" is unverifiable information? The Pakistani troops who fought in the Kargil War have been given Nishan-e-Haider. Surely that is verification enough.

Thanks,

Vayu (talk) 20:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

I understand the differentiation that you are trying to make. However, you have reverted my edit back to stating it was only "Kashmiri secessionists and Islamic militants". Please update it to state the Pakistani troops were also involved. Secondly, you have used the vandalism warning tag on my talk page. That tag shouldn't be used for content disputes. The talk pages are for that purpose.

Thanks,

Vayu (talk) 21:15, 10 November 2008 (UTC)