User:Soellis/sandbox
![]() | This is a user sandbox of Soellis. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
Ocean Policy of the Barack Obama Administration
[edit]Fishery Policy
[edit]Shark Conservation Act
[edit]The Shark Conservation Act superseded the Shark Finning Prohibition Act, passed during the Clinton administration, as an effort to remedy a loophole which became apparent in the court case of United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins[1]. Essentially, this Act made the act of fin trade at sea illegal to ensure that all sharks landed by U.S. vessels are done in line with the intentions and ordinances of the Shark Finning Prohibition Act. This act extends to all shark species with the exception of the domestically relevant commercial fishery of smooth dogfish[2]. The jurisdiction of this Act extends off of the U.S. coast for 50 nautical miles[3]. The domestic production contributing to the shark fin demand, localized in China, still occurs within the U.S., as fins can be processed once sharks have been returned to land with fins naturally attached to the body, except in states where it has locally been outlawed like Hawaii [4][5]. An effort to eradicate the trade entirely on a federal level was considered and proposed as Amendment 5b to the Shark Conservation Act, which would overrule state finning regulations, enacting a federal ban on the possession of shark fins[6]. This was not successful and efforts wavered as the various stakeholders' (i.e. state regulators, fishermen, etc.) investments manifested resulting in sufficient political resistance against the amendment . A proposal to overturn this act altogether was later put forward in fear that it overstepped the federal jurisdiction in relation to state rights. An overwhelming response from shark conservationists and lobbying groups hindered any progress to accomplish such[7].
Listing of the Scalloped hammerhead shark under the Endangered Species Act
[edit]The listing of the Scalloped hammerhead shark was a landmark measure for U.S. shark conservation, as it is the first shark to be listed under the Endangered Species Act despite overwhelming evidence of population declines warranting a ‘threatened’ or ‘endangered’ listing amongst many species[8][9]. The controversy of sharks and the fear of increased fishing bans and regulations if more sharks, a common casualty of bycatch[10], were listed is likely responsible for the disconnect between international and U.S. protection and conservation status of sharks. Within this listing, the Central and Southwest Atlantic Distinct Population Segment and the Indo-West Pacific Distinct Population Segment of Scalloped Hammerheads were protected. Determination of critical habitat was said to be stipulated in a separate, later ruling[11].
Background
[edit]Pollution
[edit]Ban on Microbeads
[edit]Marine reserves, monuments, and protected areas
[edit]Expansion of Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument
[edit]Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument
[edit]Cape Cod Marine National Monument
[edit]Ross Sea
[edit]North Bering Sea Climate Resilience Order
[edit]Fisheries
[edit]Shark Fin Conservation Act
[edit]- ^ "United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins - Environmental Law". Environmental Law. 2009-11-14. Retrieved 2017-03-09.
- ^ "Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Implementation of the Shark Conservation Act of 2010; Correction". Federal Register. 2013-06-17. Retrieved 2017-03-09.
- ^ "Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Implementation of the Shark Conservation Act of 2010; Correction". Federal Register. 2013-06-17. Retrieved 2017-03-09.
- ^ "Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Implementation of the Shark Conservation Act of 2010; Correction". Federal Register. 2013-06-17. Retrieved 2017-03-09.
- ^ "Hawaii SB2169 | 2010 | Regular Session". LegiScan. Retrieved 2017-03-16.
- ^ "Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Atlantic Shark Management Measures; Proposed Amendment 5b". Federal Register. 2016-10-18. Retrieved 2017-03-09.
- ^ "U.S. Proposal Could Weaken Shark Conservation Laws - The Pew Charitable Trusts". www.pewtrusts.org. Retrieved 2017-03-09.
- ^ Baum, Julia K.; Myers, Ransom A.; Kehler, Daniel G.; Worm, Boris; Harley, Shelton J.; Doherty, Penny A. (2003-01-17). "Collapse and Conservation of Shark Populations in the Northwest Atlantic". Science. 299 (5605): 389–392. doi:10.1126/science.1079777. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 12532016. S2CID 10038445.
- ^ "A quarter of sharks and rays threatened with extinction". IUCN. January 21, 2014.
- ^ "Global patterns in the bycatch of sharks and rays (PDF Download Available)". ResearchGate. Retrieved 2017-03-09.
- ^ "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened and Endangered Status for Distinct Population Segments of Scalloped Hammerhead Sharks". Federal Register. 2014-07-03. Retrieved 2017-03-09.