Jump to content

User:Soni/sandbox4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RRFA Recall Structure

[edit]

Initiation procedure

[edit]

Which of these conditions should be sufficient to compel an administrator to run an RRfA? Support more than one option if needed.

  • Option A: 25 EC editors sign a request within the last 1 month OR 50 EC editors within the last year (same as proposal 16C)
  • Option B: 25 EC editors sign a request within the last 1 month
  • Option C: 50 EC editors sign a request within the last 1 month
  • Option D: 40 EC editors sign a request within 10 days. Requests can be opened but are not rolling
  • Something else (specify...)

Survey (Initiation procedure)

[edit]

...

Discussion (Initiation procedure)

[edit]

...

Reconfirmation threshold

[edit]

What percentages of support are necessary for an administrator to pass a reconfirmation RfA?

  • Option A: 66.6% for a pass, 55% and above is at bureaucrat discretion (same as proposal 16C)
  • Option B: 75% for a pass, 65% and above is at bureaucrat discretion (same as RfA)
  • Option C: 60% for a pass, 50% and above is at bureaucrat discretion
  • Option D: 55% for a pass, 45% and above is at bureaucrat discretion
  • Something else (specify...)

Survey (reconfirmation threshold)

[edit]

...

Discussion (reconfirmation threshold)

[edit]

...

Eligibility to RRFA

[edit]

When is an RRFA request not allowed for an admin?

  • Option A: For 12 months after an admin successfully runs for an RFA, RFB, RRFA, or Arbcom elections (same as proposal 16C)
  • Option B: For 12 months after an admin successfully runs for an RFB, RRFA, Arbcom elections
  • Option C: (In case of non rolling requests) For 6 months after any failed RRFA requests
  • Something else (specify...)

Survey (Eligibility to RRFA)

[edit]

...

Discussion (Eligibility to RRFA)

[edit]

...

RRFA Suffrage

[edit]

When can eligible editors vote for an RRFA requests?

  • Option A: No limits
  • Option B: If they've not supported an RRFA request for the same admin in the last 2 years
  • Option C: If they've supported less than 5 currently open RRFA requests
  • Something else (specify...)

Survey (RRFA Suffrage)

[edit]

...

Discussion (RRFA Suffrage)

[edit]

...

Removing signatures

[edit]

Under what circumstance can a vote on an RRFA request be removed?

  • Option A: If a CheckUser confirms an editor as a possible sock
  • Option B: If an uninvolved admin determines the editor as disruptive
  • Something else (specify...)

Survey (Removing signatures)

[edit]

...

Discussion (Removing signatures)

[edit]

...

Desysop after RRFA request

[edit]

After a successful RRFA request, when should an admin be desysopped?

  • Option A : If an admin does not start an RRFA within 30 days of a successful RRFA request, within a bureaucrat's discretion (same as proposal 16C)
  • Option B : If an admin does not start an RRFA within 10 days of a successful RRFA request
  • Something else (specify...)

Survey (Desysop after RRFA request)

[edit]

...

Discussion (Desysop after RRFA request)

[edit]

...

RRFA Request discussion

[edit]

Should votes in a RRFA request be limited to signatures? Can they have discussion?

  • Option A : Reasoning can be added to an RRFA request, but no further discussion
  • Option B : Only signatures can be added to an RRFA discussion. No reasoning or discussion
  • Option C : Signatures and one link can be added. No reasoning or discussion
  • Something else (specify...)

Survey (RRFA Request discussion)

[edit]

...

Discussion (RRFA Request discussion)

[edit]

...

Finer Points

[edit]

If there's any implementation details not already covered by the previous sections, please add them here.

Reconfirmation by admin elections

[edit]

Can an admin stand for reconfirmation via Administrator Elections?

Survey (Reconfirmation by admin elections)

[edit]

Discussion (Reconfirmation by admin elections)

[edit]