User:Sparrowman980/Archive4
Hello, please join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Media_copyright_questions#Warning regarding the addition of warnings regarding the archive. - cohesion 00:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
GW current event?
[edit]I removed the CE tag from GW. I don't think its appropriate. Were you serious? William M. Connolley 19:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Copyright status of Scheduled passengers carried
[edit]Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Scheduled passengers carried. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites (http://www.iata.org/ps/publications/wats-passenger-carried.htm in this case) or from printed material.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Scheduled passengers carried with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article's talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Scheduled passengers carried with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. WebHamster 18:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Scheduled passengers carried
[edit]A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Scheduled passengers carried, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. MastCell Talk 23:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]Sorry to bother you. I noticed this and wondered if you need any help. Editing others' comments on talk pages is not allowed. Was it a mistake or is there something you need help with? --John 17:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
August 2007
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Rock and roll. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sparrowman980 04:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rock and roll. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Freshacconci 19:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)