User:StarryGrandma/Useful science

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Journals[edit]

Links[edit]

PMID:34702442 ([[PMID:34702442]]) links to the article at PubMed. Is this documented anywhere?

New developments[edit]

Comments on when new developments in a topic should be added to the article.

Notability[edit]

Assessing notability

  • Recommendation Guide: "How to Write an Effective Nomination" by the IEEE Fellow Committee, October 2020 - issues are similar to writing a Wikipedia article that shows both the person's professional impact and how they meet WP:NPROF. It notes that finding evidence to support a nomination for engineers in the defense industry or in proprietary fields may not be possible.

My sample comments:

  • This is an article about a topic whose only reference is a 2020 preprint. Wikipedia articles are about topics which are already well-known, not a place to put new ideas. Until this is accepted enough to be a)published in a peer review source and b) accepted by other researchers enough to be covered in review articles by authors independent of the originators, we cannot have an article. (February 2022)
  • All the references except for the textbook (no page location provided) are primary sources from the group that originated the term or from a 1982 article. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia's articles are about topics which are already well-known as shown by secondary sources such as review articles by people independent of the originators. It may be too soon to have an article. (March 2022)

References[edit]

Use of general references defended at GA review[edit]

References - inline and otherwise[edit]

Unreferenced material[edit]

Thermodynamics[edit]

Writing articles[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:StarryGrandma/Useful_science&oldid=1207033034"