User:TheNewPhobia/Complaints

Before complaining, please click the + above and supply a diff! If these are not provided, I will ignore your complaint.

I edited the page for the Australian Order of Precedence- following the Labor Party's win- and all my changes were reverted. Please explain why.

I find that your decision to tag Martin Meenan for Speedy deletion was wholly uneducated. Ryannus (talk) 23:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down, calm down. I use Twinkle, and sometimes I click the wrong button, and sometimes I'm in a rush. So, I'm sorry. And, next time, please try to be just a little more civil. Thanks, and bye! JöиÁ †ĥăИ — Quality, not quantity. 00:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Scott Horton (lawyer)

I also disagree with your decision to tat Scott Horton for speedy deletion.Athene cunicularia (talk) 00:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article: Heraeus

Hi Jonathan, you have deleted my changes at the "Heraeus" Article. Could you please explain me why. It only contained a link to the Heraeus Corporate Website. The new article is significantly better, I would like to re-enter it. Thank you, Simon --Sloebel (talk) 09:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Back to Black (album)

Ok, I left a message for you yesterday on your talk page and you seem to have ignored it, so I will ask you here. Please can you let me know why you reverted my edit and accused me of vandalism, even though I was being bold and deleting 1) listcruft, 2) included an edit summary and 3) explained edit on the article talk page? Also why you have not replied? Many thanks Sue Wallace (talk) 00:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bicentenial Man revert...

I re-edited this page because I was inadvertently logged-out on the first edit. Also, the edit was not substantially different from the existing text, merely a bit shorter and clearer. I would greatly appreciate it if you would summarize the plot, as I could learn from you. Have a Happy New Year, thank you, Shir-El too 05:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed this. You didn't follow this policy, which is why I had to revert. Sorry! Jonathan (talk • contribs • complain?) 16:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Messenger Plus! references

What I meant by the comment concerning the change I made was that the reference couldn't be valid. The section talks about complains being made and a solution being done at a later date. The referenced complains are one year older than the actual solution as listed in the article (solution done in 2005, references complains are in 2006). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.54.161 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 30 December 2007

Iowa Class Battleship Diff

You removed a post that included a recent DOD Study that has quite a bit of information about the Iowa Class Capabilities. I may have not have formatted it correctly but I feel you could correct that vs deleting it.

US Joint Forces Staff College (May 15/07) – JAWS Masters Thesis by Col. Shawn Welch, USARNG: Joint and Interdependent Requirements: A Case Study in Solving the Naval Surface Fire Support Capabilities Gap. National Defense University 2007 Award for best thesis. Persuasively argue that current capabilities are insufficient, casts doubt on the DDG-1000 Class as a solution, and makes a case that faulty assumptions have helped to create this problem. Includes a number of interesting anecdotes, as well as analysis:

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/files/2007-05_JFSC_Thesis_NFS_and_DDG-1000.pdf

Reverting my edits/untrue post on my talk page

Why do you keep reverting my edits to Serbian constitutional referendum, 2006? A part of the article is repeated and I am correcting the redundancy.

Also why did you add to my user talk page that my IP is from Schule Schloss Salem? I am in Berlin, Salem is in the south of Germany.

85.178.153.206 (talk) 15:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a shared IP! This is my home IP address, so stop reverting my edits and changing my talk page!

International Bluegrass Music Hall of Honor

diff

Johnathan, you reverted a change I made to International Bluegrass Music Hall of Fame on Feb 2nd without giving a reason. I updated a broken link and you reverted it back. Surely a working, accurate link is better than a broken one. So, why did you revert my change? On your user page you said that you do vandal reverts. Did you think that my change was vandalism? If so, what made you come to that conclusion? If not, then what was your reason?

I don't contribute to wikipedia often but I thought that I'd followed the correct procedure. It's discouraging to have one my few additions to this wonderful site reverted for no obvious reason. 128.84.255.73 (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey

srry about the things that my profile did wen i made i had a friend over and i left for a minute and he put stuff on here very sorry hope to c u around