User talk:Ucanlookitup
![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Ucanlookitup has not edited Wikipedia since 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome!
Hello, Ucanlookitup, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Thanks for reverting the grease vandal. Reyk YO! 02:37, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Reporting vandalism
[edit]Thanks for reporting the vandal on White (people) to WP:AIV. The vandal has been dealt with. --Cyde Weys 03:05, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit] - you, my friend, deserve a WikiThanks for this edit: [1]. I wonder, if you wouldn't mind taking a look at London Lock Hospital? There is some abiguity about the 1746/1747 dates which I hope you could fix too with your expertise :-) --HappyCamper 03:14, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
A tool for leaving warning messages
[edit]Hi. I noticed that you actively revert vandalism to articles. Thanks!! I also noticed that in at least one case (Ernest Hemingway) you didn't leave a warning message on the vandal's talk page. I know that leaving lots of messages can be tedious, even with the templates documented at Wikipedia:Vandalism, so I've made a tool to help make it quick and easy. It's explained at User:Kbh3rd/Vandal_warning_toolbox. A list of warnings can be added to that toolbox menu on the left whenever a user talk page is being edited so that the proper warning message is only a click away. You might like to try it out.
Thanks again for your help! (Great username, btw.) --Kbh3rdtalk 02:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
[edit]Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Ucanlookitup! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Computerjoe's talk 16:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() | Warning to Vandals: This user is armed with VandalProof. |
User:139.130.97.98
[edit]Hey. Concerning the following IP address, this is a computer at my school and is used by hundreds of people every day. I am typing from it as I speak. I'm not sure what the policy is on these sort of addresses but I though I would let you know that. Normy132 05:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Normy, I understand your concern. Please understand that in order to remain a credible encyclopedia, Wikipedia must do it's best to prevent vandalism. The good news is that even if the IP is blocked for a short period of time, users that have an account (like yourself) will be able to continue making changes.Ucanlookitup 05:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Fox News Controversies
[edit]Sorry about that. I'm not sure how that happened. Thanks for the note. FeloniousMonk 05:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Found the cause. There's a known issue it seems. The warning message "Attention Firefox and Google Toolbar users: You may find that long pages are cut off unexpectedly while editing in tabs; please be careful. This issue has been reported to Google, and we hope they will fix it." appears on the edit page when you edit an entire page (as opposed to a section). I'm using both Firefox and Google Toolbar, so I'm doomed. Thanks for your note again. FeloniousMonk 04:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- I thought that might be it. I use FF as well - that's a real annoying bug. I wonder if anyones told Mozilla about it. Thanks for letting me know.Nice nickname BTW. I take it, your a jazz fan. Ucanlookitup 10:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Mel Gibson
[edit]Hey, thanks for the feedback. I don't fully understand why you deleted my contribution to this page. I figured that his Jew-hatred was as important if not moreso than his being US-born or Australian-raised. To keep the controversy under control, I still listed his Jew-hatred last as if to give the impression that it was not as important, but you and I both know the truth. I would appreciate if you would not disrupt my assistance in making Wikipedia a more comprehensive and reliable source of information in the future. Thanks. 69.161.135.145 03:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Insterting "Jew-Hating" into the article hardly qualifies as NPOV. You can certainly add a reliable source that describes the incident, but merely inserting an epithet into the article is vandalism.
Lieberman
[edit]I'm going to stop working until I can figure out if you caught all the vandalism: let me know? Thanks, Sandy 00:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- He was a persistant fellow, but he's been blocked for now. I'll keep an eye on it for a while. Sorry you had such a frustrating time of it.
- Thanks, but there have been many over the last few days. I put in a request for semi-protection, since it hasn't eased up for several days. OK, I'll go back to cleaning up refs now :-) Sandy 00:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like you got the semi-protection. Happy editing!
- Thanks :-) Sandy 01:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like you got the semi-protection. Happy editing!
- Thanks, but there have been many over the last few days. I put in a request for semi-protection, since it hasn't eased up for several days. OK, I'll go back to cleaning up refs now :-) Sandy 00:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Nice work :)
[edit]With your vandal fighting = great minds think alike huh? (see WP:AIV) - Glen 03:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks - I think you beat me by a millisec :)
blog
[edit]I've removed my blog but you put it back again! why? Celine in texas 02:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Celine, I deleted it because in each edit you were removing the tag requesting deletion. Until the discussion is closed, the tag should remain. I see in your latest edit, you left the tag in place - that's great. Please feel free to participate in the discussion by clicking on the link in the tag. Ucanlookitup 02:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Hey, I've noticed several times today that you've beat me to reverts on the Wikicalendar pages. Looking at your user contributions, I see you've been an active vandal fighter for some time, so please accept this Barnstar in appreciation of your efforts. Keep up the great work! Fabricationary 03:15, 21 August 2006 (UTC) |
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks for reverting my user page. :-) --Casper2k3 01:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Glad to help!
Mistake
[edit]I keep getting messages from you and other moderators that I'm editing the Wizard page. I have done no such thing. Either you have the wrong IP or the person doing it is using a proxy.
- Hi - The edit you're referring to ([2]) was back in August, 2006. It's entirely possible that someone else had that IP address then. If the comments are not relevant to you, feel free to remove them. Ucanlookitup 01:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
?
[edit]May I ask you why you have reverted my edits: Javier Sotomayor and Orlando Hernández? What do you think is wrong? Doma-w 17:51, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Doma-w, I recognize that Orlando Hernandez Pedrosa may well be his birth name . His divorce decree (per smoking gun) seems to indicate that. I'm also aware that his mother's name was Pedrosa. To simply change his name, though, without providing a context or citing sources is confusing. Are you saying that his current legal name is Pedrosa? I don't think that's accurate. If you want to add his birthname and cite appropriate sources - I have no problem with that. Authoritative sources that I can find, though, list him as Orlando Hernandez.
- Thank you for your answer. First of all I do not understand why you have revert my complete edit, when you have only a problem with the name? For me there are enough sources to add the name. Sorrily I have no idea if this is only his birthname and not his current name. If you are sure, that birthname and current name differs, maybe you can change it into Orlando Hernández, née Hernández Pedroso? Is this an appropriate solution for you? Thank you and :) Doma-w 09:03, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Continued on Orlando Hernandez's discussion page...
- You can learn more about Spanish names here: Spanish naming customs. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Doma-w (talk • contribs) 23:43, August 20, 2007 (UTC).
- Thanks for the clarification. I'm noticing that articles about people from Spanish countries seem to be inconsistent with regard to using the mother's name as the second surname. Sounds like an issue for the manual of style.Ucanlookitup 00:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Come to WikiPhiladelphia meeting
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b1/KeysToCommunity.jpg/100px-KeysToCommunity.jpg)
You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
September 12, 2009
Time: 3 pm
Location: University City, Philadelphia
NOTE: The date and time of this meetup has been changed to accommodate other regional activities.
The purpose of this meeting is to finalize our plans for the Wiki Takes Philadelphia event. We'll discuss logistics, establish jobs, and coordinate with participating groups.
The floor will also be open to discussing other projects relating to the Wiki and Free Culture movement.
Afterward at around 5pm, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local sports bar.
Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b1/KeysToCommunity.jpg/100px-KeysToCommunity.jpg)
You're invited to the
Wiki Takes Philadelphia
October 4, 2009
Time: 12 pm
Location: Drexel Quad (33rd and Market)
University City, Philadelphia
Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia is a photo scavenger hunt and free content photography contest to be held all around Philadelphia aimed at illustrating Wikipedia articles.
Scheduled for Sunday, October 4, 2009, the check-in location will be at the Drexel University quad (between Chestnut and Market, 33rd and 32nd) at noon, and the ending party and photo uploading (location to be announced) will be at 6 PM. To reach the Drexel quad, walk south from Market Street at 32nd Street into the campus.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
reverting vandalism
[edit] Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Macroeconomics. Note that old versions of Wikipedia articles are kept in their page history, and it is usually better to deal with vandalism by using the page history to restore the previous version, rather than removing it manually, as otherwise any content removed by the vandal is not restored. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you. Turgan Talk 03:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Tagged
[edit]Thanks for your response at Talk:Tagged. I liked your explanation of how Hitwise works ;-)
I was just browsing this list of Wikipedia's most popular pages, and was surprised to find Tagged listed at number 193, with over 12,000 views per day! Odd how close that is to MySpace, with about 14,000 including redirects. Maybe people are still getting "friend requests" or whatever and coming to Wikipedia to find out what they're all about.
Cheers, Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 13:53, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Interesting. I wouldn't have guessed it would be that high. All the more reason to keep it accurate! Ucanlookitup (talk) 14:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Hmmm... I take back my previous comment. Seems something anomalous happened in August, the month the list linked above was based on. The raw data is at http://stats.grok.se/en/200908/Tagged Typically Myspace gets several fold more hits per day than Tagged. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 14:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- Wow - That's quite a spike in August. I wonder what's up with that. It's so dramatic I'm wondering if there isn't an issue with the data. Ucanlookitup (talk) 15:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Fox news controversies
[edit]New talkpage discussion about my recent edit and your revert. Soxwon (talk) 05:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
You're invited to Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b1/KeysToCommunity.jpg/100px-KeysToCommunity.jpg)
You're invited to the
Wiki Takes Philadelphia
April 11, 2010
Time: 12 pm
Location: Drexel Quad (33rd and Market)
University City, Philadelphia
Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia is a photo scavenger hunt and free content photography contest to be held all around Philadelphia aimed at illustrating Wikipedia articles.
Scheduled for Sunday, April 11, 2010, the check-in location will be at the Drexel University quad (between Chestnut and Market, 33rd and 32nd) at noon, and the ending party and photo uploading (location to be announced) will be at 6 PM. To reach the Drexel quad, walk south from Market Street at 32nd Street into the campus.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg/130px-Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg.png)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello - invitation
[edit]Hello there,
Since you seem to have an interest in social media, like I do, I wanted to invite you to help work on the social media article. The definition of social media has been fairly hard to nail down. I do not agree that social media has a direct relation to 2.0 as the current definition says. The funny part is that when I went to do research a few books actually said outright that "wikipedia doesn't even know" how to define social media. So I really thought this article could use more help. :)
Thanks and happy editing!A. Ward (talk) 16:49, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Tagging Tagged
[edit]Just a heads-up that I've made an offline draft of an ANI report regarding recent events, which I'll submit if they continue. I'm glad everyone's been so patient and calm about this.
Cheers, Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 07:02, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks - I think we're probably headed there. Ucanlookitup (talk) 07:55, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Just letting you know about my post to Brettalan's talk page that might interest you. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 14:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like we're going to need that report. Goaloverhere is out of control. *sigh*. Thanks for your help, U. Brettalan (talk) 02:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Not a problem - Sanity will prevail, but it looks like we're in for a rough ride. I'm thinking it's about time to call him on edit warring, but we'll see if he comes to the table and actually discusses it in good faith. Ucanlookitup (talk) 03:10, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- You've got mail. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 05:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not a problem - Sanity will prevail, but it looks like we're in for a rough ride. I'm thinking it's about time to call him on edit warring, but we'll see if he comes to the table and actually discusses it in good faith. Ucanlookitup (talk) 03:10, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Looks like we're going to need that report. Goaloverhere is out of control. *sigh*. Thanks for your help, U. Brettalan (talk) 02:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Tagged article notice
[edit]Hello, Ucanlookitup. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NCSS (talk) 22:16, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
2013 Philadelphia Wiki-Picnic: Saturday, June 22
[edit]![]() |
Philadelphia's Great American Wiknic at Penn Park | ![]() |
You are invited to the Philadelphia edition of the Great American Wiknic taking place in Penn Park, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there!--User:Ocaasi (talk)|}} |
GLAM Cafe invitation
[edit]![]() |
Wikipedians are invited to the GLAM Café at the Chemical Heritage Foundation to meet, talk, and edit. We provide the space, the coffee, and the snacks: you provide ideas and enthusiasm! On the second Tuesday of each month, starting November 12, 2013. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 00:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC) | ![]() |
rfc/u
[edit]Neutral notification to all participants in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeerXML of this: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/PrivateWiddle.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
MLotS for you!
[edit]![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a massive leviathan of the seas!. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
(Note to talk-page stalkers: This is a joke, not a real massive-leviathan-of-the-seas-ing of this user).— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 23:06, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ha! Totally deserved. Ucanlookitup (talk) 23:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
You closed Wikipedia:Requests for comment/PrivateWiddle, but didn't provide any summary for it. Could you do it now? Armbrust The Homunculus 12:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Arbrust, I closed the RFC under the guidelines for 'Inactivity' here which doesn't ask for a summary rather than closing by agreement, which does. I apologize if I followed the wrong process or misunderstood it. Ucanlookitup (talk) 00:57, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, I added a note, that is was closed due to inactivity. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:42, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Join us this Saturday (July 30) at the Philadelphia Wiknic
[edit]Join us this Saturday (July 30) at the Philadelphia Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit". This is an opportunity to meet other local Wikipedians, have fun, and discuss potential projects.
The event is this Saturday, between 1pm-5pm at the Picnic Grove in Penn Park.
(To unsubscribe from future messages, remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia/Philadelphia meet-up invite list.)
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ucanlookitup. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ucanlookitup. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)