User talk:Unidyne

Welcome!

Hello, Unidyne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

The Wookieepedian 04:29, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube

Hi there! Please don't add links to copyright infringement YouTube videos (as you did at Southern Television) - linking to content that is in violation of copyright is likely to land Wikipedia in hot water, so we don't encourage people to do it. Thanks and happy editing! 〈RED VEЯS〉 08:53, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-

I was unaware that the material constituted copyright violation. I'll refrain from posting links from YouTube unless I am certain the material is in public domain. Unidyne 06:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Unidyne!

Just recognized your name from STW, and thought I'd say cheers. Cheers, Doctormatt 03:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Backmasked message

Unidyne, the type of citation Wikipedia needs is not the name, copyright, etc. of the disc, but instead an article that discusses the backmasked message itself. This is to comply with one of Wikipedia's core policies, Wikipedia:No original research. If you do find such a citation, please contact me at User talk:Audacity. Thanks, Λυδαcιτγ 03:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OpenCola link

Hey, no problem. It was a good idea you had, and thanks for dropping off the kind note! --Daniel11 23:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Place names with English meanings

An article that you have been involved in editing, Place names with English meanings, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Place names with English meanings. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 19:59, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duck Soup peer review

Season's greetings, Unidyne! I've just submitted Duck Soup for peer review in order to find out some better ways to improve the article's (and other Marx Brothers articles) quality. If you're interested in leaving feedback, you can go to the article's talk page and follow the link. Thanks. — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 22:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So far, there's only been one response to my submission of Duck Soup for critiques. However, the editor supplied some good observations, and even stated that "this article has good potential for Featured Article Status". Well, there's my New Year's resolution: Improve Duck Soup to FA quality and get it nominated. It would be nice to have the Marx Brother's magnum opus as a featured article, eh? I'll need your help, though, in that regard, as well as assistance from others. — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 21:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos!

Kudos to you for your addition to the North American currency union article! --Kralizec! (talk) 23:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please help save Repo Man movie article

Yo Unidyne,

This guy, Dædαlus, is in there trying to remove parts that you, I and many others contributed to the Repo Man article. Please add to the bottom of this thread on the Repo Man talk page that you think the "Notable Motifs" section should not be blanked (erased), but left as is since the Pulp Fiction article also has a "Notable Motifs" section that isn't being considered for removal at all (even by Dædαlus himself).

While I agree that the "Notable Motifs" section could use some work, it certainly won't help the article to delete the whole thing and erase all our work which consists of many multiple contributers over a course of years. I'm willing to work on it and better incorporate it into the article, he just wants to delete it all!

With consensus, we can stop this guy from deleting all our work soon!

Thanks in advance. Cowicide (talk) 02:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carl McIntire

Hi, Unidyne,

Thanks for your expansion of material on Carl McIntire's pirate radio station. I noticed that you had a citation to "FTA Battles for Airwaves", Overthrow, March 1984, Page 18." What's Overthrow, and where did you see that reference? Thanks,--John Foxe (talk) 12:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Overthrow" was the publication of the Youth International Party (originally named "The Yipster Times"). The Y.I.P. was a revolutionary anarcho-socialist group known for street theatre pranks (Two of their leaders, if that is the proper term, were Jerry Rubin and Abbie Hoffman), but their publication featured surprisingly in-depth (if politically biased) reporting. I came across the article in an old issue of the publication while going through some old documents. I recognized the portion about Carl McIntire and how he tried to establish an off-shore gospel station. I thought the information was worthy enough to add to his biography. "FTA" was a group called "Free The Airwaves", which tried to establish a co-operative of pirate radio stations. Thank you for asking. Unidyne (talk) 05:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Interesting and curious.--John Foxe (talk) 11:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization?

Hello. I am not sure if your capitalization changes [1] to the North American currency union article are correct. My understanding is that a currency's name is always lowercase, as shown in the Wikipedia articles on the dollar and euro. Your thoughts? Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 01:32, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea knowledge that currency names were to be in lower case. I've seen the word "Amero" capitalized so often on various conspiracy-themed websites. If it is to be in lower case, then so be it.Unidyne (talk) 03:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone onto the article and removed the capitalization I had put up, save for the capitals used by Daniel Carr in his statement from his website.Unidyne (talk) 03:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ray B

It would be better to restore the original text, with refs to IMDb if needed. 77.103.88.137 (talk) 00:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:TheRedPenOfDoom (Again)

Hi Unidyne, thanks for letting me know about User:TheRedPenOfDoom's edits to Diner lingo - I will let the user know that his actions are not very beneficial to the integrity of the project. Also - I have re-added the most recent edit you made to Dinner Lingo, but User:TheRedPenOfDoom removed. - Fastily (talk) 05:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced WP:OR

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Diner lingo, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.-- The Red Pen of Doom 21:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of CB slang

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is CB slang. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CB slang. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Legal status of Texas and Republic of Texas (group)

An article that you have been involved in editing, "Republic of Texas (group)" and another, "Legal status of Texas" has been proposed for a merge with Texas Secession Movement. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Otr500 (talk) 05:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Please see the discussion of this article, which you contributed to: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texe Marrs (2nd nomination). Thanks. BigJim707 (talk) 03:30, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of defunct department stores of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Eastern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Minstrel show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allan Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of apocalyptic songs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jethro Tull. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Unidyne. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Unidyne. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral notice

There is an RfC at an article you have edited, to which you may wish to add your input: Talk:American Flagg!#Request for comment. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Unidyne. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Lincoln Rockwell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Lampoon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]