Jump to content

User:Violetriga/ongoing/Young blood transfusion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Young blood transfusion refers to transfusing blood specifically from a young animal into an older recipient with the intention of creating a medicinal benefit. While some studies declare that benefits have been observed in mice the lack of evidence and truly rigorous test environments means that the scientific community remains highly skeptical. Furthermore, contradictory evidence has been presented which suggests that young blood may have a reduced impact compared to other sources. The practice is seen as being a "current trend" in regenerative medicine and life extension while news reports relate it to various tales of immortality.

Trials on mice

[edit]

Neuroscientist Tony Wyss-Coray leads a team of researchers at Stanford University investigating the use of young blood transfusions in mice. A study published by them in 2014 detailed the results of several tests including parabiosis in mice; as part of their investigations they sutured two mice of different ages together, with both animals sharing a circulatory system. The study concluded that the blood from the younger mouse contributed to improved synaptic plasticity in the older mouse and this consequently led to a perceived improvement in learning and memory. They also demonstrated that a transferral of a young mouse's blood plasma into an older mouse allowed the latter to significantly improve in certain tasks related to learning and memory. In 2017 a further study by Wyss-Coray and his team was published in Nature. This showed that older mice could benefit from blood transfused from human umbilical cords. They claim that this appears to "rejuvenate an old brain and make it work more like a younger one".[1] In a 2017 article published in The Economist the effects in mice were labelled "spectacular" but the author made the point that the reason why this happened was not clear.[2]

In 2018 a study by Dr. Saul Villeda, an assistant professor at the University of California, published new findings in journal Cell Reports. Villeda suggests that old brains may have "dormant plasticity" which can be utilised. "Young blood" has the ability to stimulate significant changes in DNA as regulated by the TET2 enzyme. Older brains have lower levels of TET2 with the hippocampus, the area of the brain associated with memory and learning, being particularly deficient. Villeda believes that DNA manipulation might in the future allow scientists to "make an organism younger again".[3]

Human tests

[edit]

A startup company named Ambrosia has been selling "young blood transfusions" for $8,000 since 2017 under the guise of running a clinical trial, to see if such transfusions lead to changes in the blood of recipients.[4][5][6] Other, more advanced human trials are reported to be underway in China and Korea.[7]

Evidence from two large studies in 2017 showed that the transfusion of blood from younger donors to older people was either no different from, or led to worse outcomes than, blood from older donors.[4][8] Research on blood transfusion outcomes has been complicated by the lack of careful characterization of the transfusion products that have been used in clinical trials; studies had focused on how storage methods and duration might affect blood, but not on the differences among lots of blood themselves.[9] Due to the current lack of evidence and the contradictory findings the scientific community currently views the practice as little more than snake oil.[4]

A company, Alkahest, was spun out of Stanford based on that work, and as of 2017 was collaborating with European pharmaceutical company Grifols to create a blood plasma-based experimental biologic drug, which they propose to test on people with Alzheimer's.[5][10]

Amy Maxmen writing for the MIT Technology Review warned of the dangers of such trials, noting that transfusions are generally considered safe but can have side effects including deadly infections.[11]

Reporting

[edit]

Young blood transfusions have been called a "current trend" in regenerative medicine,[12] with significant Silicon Valley investment in "life extension".[13] Jeff Bercovici wrote for Inc. that it is "a popular obsession" and that there are rumours of wealthy technology bosses "spending tens of thousands of dollars for the procedures and young-person-blood".[7] The practice was referenced in a 2017 episode of comedy series Silicon Valley in which the boss of a technology company uses transfusions from a "blood boy" in an attempt to stay young and live longer.[14]

News media have widely reported such practices using far-fetched analogies, likening the procedure to the Fountain of Youth and the elixir of life.[1][12] Others have related it to stories of vampires.[2][3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Makin, Simon (21 April 2017). "Fountain of Youth? Young Blood Infusions "Rejuvenate" Old Mice". Scientific American. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
  2. ^ a b "Can young blood really rejuvenate the old?". The Economist. 21 July 2017. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  3. ^ a b "The vampire molecule: scientists discover why young blood helps reverse aging". CBC Radio. 3 March 2018. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  4. ^ a b c Novella, Steven (3 August 2016). "Parabiosis – The Next Snakeoil". Science-Based Medicine.
  5. ^ a b de Magalhães, JP; Stevens, M; Thornton, D (November 2017). "The Business of Anti-Aging Science". Trends in biotechnology. 35 (11): 1062–1073. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.07.004. PMID 28778607. Open access icon
  6. ^ Haynes, Gavin (21 August 2017). "Ambrosia: the startup harvesting the blood of the young". The Guardian. Retrieved 23 May 2018.
  7. ^ a b Bercovici, Jeff. "Peter Thiel Is Very, Very Interested In Young People's Blood". Inc. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
  8. ^ Garraud, O (August 2017). "Younger blood from older donors: Admitting ignorance and seeking stronger data and clinical trials?". Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis. 56 (4): 635–636. doi:10.1016/j.transci.2017.07.002. PMID 28780993.
  9. ^ Ning, S; Heddle, NM; Acker, JP (January 2018). "Exploring donor and product factors and their impact on red cell post-transfusion outcomes". Transfusion medicine reviews. 32 (1): 28–35. doi:10.1016/j.tmrv.2017.07.006. PMID 28988603.
  10. ^ Drew, L (27 September 2017). "Neuroscience: The power of plasma". Nature. 549 (7673): S26–S27. doi:10.1038/549S26a. PMID 28953857.
  11. ^ Maxmen, Amy (13 January 2017). "Questionable "Young Blood" Transfusions Offered in U.S. as Anti-Aging Remedy". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  12. ^ a b "Young Blood Transfusions - The Elixir Of Youth?". Medium. 1 November 2017. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  13. ^ Horn, Dara (25 January 2018). "The Men Who Want to Live Forever". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 May 2018.
  14. ^ Qualey, Erin (2017). "Yes, the blood boy on Silicon Valley is actually a thing". Hidden Remote. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "NS17" is not used in the content (see the help page).

Category:Transfusion medicine Category:Hematology Category:Blood