User:Waonderer/Archive/1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indian Institute of Technology Mandi (October 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dudhhr was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Indian Institute of Technology Mandi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– dudhhr^talk_contribs^she_her 17:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Waonderer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – dudhhr^talk_contribs^she_her 17:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Aastha Sharma, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Materialscientist, Thanks for the message. Yes, I forgot to add the "Edit summary". Apologies.

After your revert, I did message on the Talk page: Talk:Aastha Sharma

My changes were to address the challenges mentioned in the "maintenance template". It states that there are too many links to other articles, and the page requires cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. I could see that there are multiple references for the same detail, where one reference is more than enough.

Hence, I made the appropriate removals and re-published, I missed to add "Edit Summary" while publishing the changes.

P.S. I am using a Talk page for the first time. So, I don't know if this reaches you OR I'd have to message you on your Talk page. Sunil (talk) 04:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mani, Bihar has been accepted[edit]

Mani, Bihar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 20:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

<3 Sunil (talk) 07:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Kuldeep Yadav ESPN.webp[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kuldeep Yadav ESPN.webp. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paras Chopra (November 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All statements need to be sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paras Chopra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paras Chopra (January 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mach61 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It seems very likely to me that this person could be notable based on sources not in the draft. With that being said, there appear to be no independent, reliable sources sources cited outside of perhaps Forbes India; see WP:SELFPUB, WP:FORBESCON, and WP:NEWSORGINDIA for details.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paras Chopra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 05:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited IIT Mandi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paras Chopra (February 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The first Inc42 reference is possible, but the second falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA as does the Forbes India content. Being known as a 30 under 30 member is not the same as a Fellow or the like. Still needs to show significant coverage in reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paras Chopra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 00:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

CNMall41 Thanks for the review. I agree with you and won't be editing the page further. I can delete the draft but don't know how. Therefore, I'd leave it as it is so that it gets deleted automatically in 6 months. If you can delete it earlier to save resources, you are free to do so. Waonderer (talk) 13:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)