User:Yl1665/sandbox
Appearance
Article Evaluation
[edit]1. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- Everything in this article are relevant to the topic. However Vehicular communication systems section is located between the Policy implication and Public opinion surveys, which I think it should be aligned with technology part.
2. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- I think the technology section should contain more information instead of listing some deep learning jargon.
3. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- Well in the cost section which illustrate that the insurance cost of auto mobile will end is out of date. The article was published 6 years ago in 2012 and I think the insurance cost will not end and probably will higher than today. And the truck section should add Tesla Truck.
4. Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- They talk about over aggressive editing that two editors are deleting positive comments, new technologies are popping up, and unclarity about automated vs autonomous.
Preference
[edit]- ^ "Autonomous car". Wikipedia. 2018-04-08.