User talk:$hawn2004

Article

January 2019[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Josh Gordon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Josh Gordon was changed by $hawn2004 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96765 on 2019-01-09T01:10:43+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Josh Gordon, you may be blocked from editing. — MRD2014 ^Talk 01:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clue bot[edit]

I don't know what clue bot is but I don't see why Wikipedia lets everybody edit but I was not the one lying it is the truth $hawn2004 (talk) 01:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apology[edit]

I apologize I was in the wrong for doing what I did. $hawn2004 (talk) 01:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Josh Gordon. Serols (talk) 19:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

$hawn2004 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here $hawn2004 Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 20:23, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

$hawn2004 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that what I did was wrong and how I should not vandalize pages on wikipedia but instead figure out ways to be more helpful to researchers on Wikipedia that can't find the answers to their questions anywhere else and I will strive to become a good editor and not vandalize pages on wikipedia.

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 22:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

$hawn2004 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be an editor for Wikipedia but I know what I did was wrong and the way I want help make things right here on wikipedia is that I will try to be a guide for people here on Wikipedia for people that need answers to their questions that they can't find anywhere else. I want to put my vandalising past aside and help the people so if I could be unblocked I will give back to the wikipedia community if you decline I understand $hawn2004 (talk) 23:06, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So sorry. I cannot unbock you at this time. Please followe the instructions given by Yamla in their decline above. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I provided you a path forward. Are you rejecting this? --Yamla (talk) 00:37, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to send you a message saying I needed to be unblocked so I could edit an article Yamla.

$hawn2004 (talk) 01:42, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. If you truly believe this then you lack sufficient competence to be unblocked. Follow the instructions you've been given. --Yamla (talk) 12:13, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You know what Yamla if you are going sit down and call people incompetent you can kiss my ass because I am done with wikipedia you guys are stupid to believe I was going actually devote all my time because if you unblocked me I was just gonna more pages anyway so you could just ban me because I am done with this shit you guys are all stupid for devoting your life to a stupid website and lastly everybody that devotes their wikipedia needs GET A LIFE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by $hawn2004 (talk • contribs)

Okay. If you change your mind, you can use WP:UTRS to request your talk page access be reinstated so you can follow the instructions above. Given this outburst, I suggest the soonest you should attempt this would be six months from now. I've revoked your access to this page given your continued abuse. --Yamla (talk) 12:26, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

{unblock|reason= I was being stupid about my editing privileges on Wikipedia and to that I am deeply sorry this time I want make things right. I will edit pages and not vandalize them I will guide people in the right direction to the right information if I can be given a second chance.} $hawn2004 (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]