User talk:Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου

Welcome to my talk page !'

I should be obliged if you want to discuss anything to discuss in Greek page. [1]

However if you want to discuss However if you want click here.

August 2015[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Carrefour. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 15:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for unsourced and unexplained edits on multiple articles (see contributions, all edits have been reverted for being unsourced, unexplained and unconstructive). Thomas.W ^talk 15:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

Please do not edit-war over the terminology used to refer to Macedonia. Wikipedia editors have developed a binding consensus guideline on how to refer to the country, outlined at WP:NCMAC. This is based on the policy of using the most common name generally used in English to refer a country, and/or the name that a country chooses to use for itself, no matter if these names are politically acceptable to third parties (see the naming-conflict guideline). The Arbitration Committee has decided that all edits affecting the Macedonia naming issue are subject to a one-revert restriction: no editor is allowed to undo another editor's action more than once within 24 hours. In cases covered by the binding guideline, editors restoring the consensus version are not subject to this restriction.

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain[edit]

This edit --NeilN ^{talk to me} 07:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban[edit]

I tried to explain this to you but you were unable or unwilling to listen. Because you have repeatedly made edits such as these[2][3][4][5][6] and have ignored warnings and discussion and violated the 1RR restriction on the topic repeatedly I am imposing a 2 month topic ban from posting anywhere on Wikipedia about the topic of Macedonia or pages related to Macedonia broadly construed. Any edit in this area for the next 2 months will result in a block. More information about topic bans can be found here: WP:TBAN.

Please see the discretionary sanction alert you received on the 24th of June from @Future Perfect at Sunrise: for more information about this. After the ban is over you may return to the topic are if you are willing to accept the community's consensus regarding the name of the nation of Macedonia. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 12:50, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating your topic ban here, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please copy my appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard or administrators' noticeboard. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.

Decline reason:

Considering that you can't actually speak English, I really don't see why you should be trying to edit here at all. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also why should I limit ? Because I discuss it long ago ? Not answer me . Junta is not it? Naturally! It irrational.restriction hears there. I said some thing or the Other ( do not remember the name I hope you understand or will understand ) .--Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου (talk) 18:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need to write a coherent unblock request addressing the reason why you were blocked before anyone will consider it. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to be unblocked your first step is to write a sensible, meaningful request in acceptable English in the unblock template. If your skill in the English language is not adequate then you should edit the Wikipedia of your native language.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:NeilN Please take off the block. Okay I will deal with this issue for a month . Ok, do you agree ? And User:Anthony , I know I wrote something wrong periorismos and paralogo , accidentally . Sorry.--Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου (talk) 22:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can return to editing here in a month. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:NeilN Why; I promised. Well I swear. Ok?--Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου (talk) 07:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Thomas.WI understand Thomas but these are my one and I can not change them . The Jaguar what does ?--Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου (talk) 07:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI-notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 14:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:JeanisDEL in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Wes Mouse ✒ 15:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]