User talk:Оксана Чопак

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Оксана Чопак, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 00:11, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing[edit]

Hello Оксана Чопак. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Оксана Чопак. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Оксана Чопак|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:41, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--Oksana Chopak (talk) 11:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC) Hello, GSS. Thank you for your message. I am paid by Native Education, I did not mean disrespect and did not know about the requirement to reveal my conflict of interests. I will provide the required disclosure.Oksana Chopak (talk) 11:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just to fully understand, who is "Native Education"? - Ahunt (talk) 12:06, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Оксана Чопак Can you please provide links to all places, where you advertise your business e.g. your upwork profile etc. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ahunt (talk) Native Education is a secret PR company run with the backing of the British elite. They are so secretive, they don’t even have a website. --Oksana Chopak (talk) 14:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GSS (talk|c|em) I work at Upwork, here is my profile https://www.upwork.com/o/profiles/users/_~012646f088baa90139/ I'm very sorry, it won’t happen again. --Oksana Chopak (talk) 14:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. Basically you have to stop doing that paid editing. It isn't allowed by policy here. - Ahunt (talk) 15:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tronsmart (February 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tronsmart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tronsmart, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS (talk|c|em) 02:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:TAVAD[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:TAVAD, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Knowyourmoney[edit]

Hello, Оксана Чопак. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Knowyourmoney".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tronsmart[edit]

Hello, Оксана Чопак. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tronsmart".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]