User talk:Роне

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Роне, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! The garmine ^(talk) 14:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rudanovsky[edit]

Privet -- See if you like the work on Rudanovsky Foundation. (Kolya) Rhadow (talk) 01:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Konstantin Rudanovsky[edit]

I reviewed the article you started on Konstantin Rudanovsky. I did notice that this reference requires WordPress login, and that the blog operator allow you to read the page. Do you have access to the page? Can you update the reference to include title and a relevant |quote=? I would also prefer that you find a book source, if possible, or at least a web source that can be accessed by someone without having to go through the steps to get access to that WordPress page.

Feel free to let me know and/or submit a Resource Request if you are otherwise unable to find another reliable source for that article.

Thanks for your contributions! = paul2520 (talk) 21:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Rudanovsky Foundation[edit]

Hello, Роне,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Rudanovsky Foundation should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudanovsky Foundation .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Jbh ^Talk 05:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rudanovsky Foundation[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rudanovsky Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jbh ^Talk 19:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion Tag Removal[edit]

Please not no remove the speedy deletion tag from Rudanovsky Foundation. It was deleted for failing Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion after discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudanovsky Foundation. Please do not recreate the article without new reliable sources which clearly show it meets the notability requirements for articles. I strongly suggest the article that you use the Articles for Creation Process. Thank you. Jbh ^Talk 12:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Rudanovsky Foundation. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:00, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Rudanovsky Foundation shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Reverting the CSD tag again on this article will result in a block for edit warring. Jbh ^Talk 14:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Роне reported by User:Jbhunley (Result: ). Thank you. Jbh ^Talk 14:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Rudanovsky Foundation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:56, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]