User talk:सत्यान्वेषी

Gujarat election[edit]

This content is better deserved at 14th Gujarat Assembly. Moved there. No need to give update of every seat in last 5 year. this goes to the assembly article. Venkat TL (talk) 07:09, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to inform me, and another thanks to move the content to a more deserved article, but I have added a short summary so don't mind सत्यान्वेषी (talk) 07:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Dhruv edits (talk) 03:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

🔔

सत्यान्वेषी (talk) 04:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election, especially if it involves living persons. [1] Venkat TL (talk) 11:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 11:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 21:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Pejorative on Article talk page[edit]

I see you have used multiple pejorative in your article talk page comments. I am asking you to remove all of them. (e.g. RNDTV) from Talk:2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election, article talk page is not your facebook wall. If you refuse to remove them, I am going to report this behavior. Venkat TL (talk) 11:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Venkat TL (talk) 11:17, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Dhruv edits. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:39, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 20:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note specifically this egregious attack, and this rubbish. Bishonen | tålk 20:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

{{unblock|reason= Sir, I have made almost 100 edits on articles and most of which are constructive and additive, [1] And I promise that all of my edits will be constructive and will not involve controversial topics [2] and The Wire (India) has recently confessed that it spread fake news on Tek Fog and Meta, and I used the source to call it a fake and manufactured news website, and the Website is well known for its leftist bias. So please unblock me and I will prevent namecalling usage of obvious perjoratives.

सत्यान्वेषी (talk) 09:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

सत्यान्वेषी (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, I have made almost 100 edits on articles and most of which are constructive and additive, [1] And I promise that all of my edits will be constructive and will not involve controversial topics [2] and The Wire (India) has recently confessed that it spread fake news on Tek Fog and Meta, and I used the source to call it a fake and manufactured news website, and the Website is well known for its leftist bias. So please unblock me and I will prevent namecalling usage of obvious perjoratives.

Decline reason:

Try again. WP:GAB explains how to craft an appropriate unblock request. Yamla (talk) 10:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.