User talk:सनातनी आर्य

Welcome![edit]

Hello, सनातनी आर्य! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Ratnahastin (talk) 06:44, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

W

Speedy deletion nomination of Kavita joshi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kavita joshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GermanKity (talk) 08:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kavita joshi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kavita joshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kavita joshi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GermanKity (talk) 02:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chahamanas of Shakambhari. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Rawal Jaisal, may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 16:24, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Anshsaini0304 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 14:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SpacemanSpiff they are a sock of Hind Ji see this sock investigationRatnahastin (talk) 08:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why you block me.[edit]

Why are you block me. Please give me correct reasons. Sanatani arya (talk|Sanatani arya|talk 21:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me right reasons.??? Why are you block me. I,m not Mali ( Saini). I,m Arya Samaji Jat. Sanatani arya (talk|Sanatani arya|talk 05:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

? ?? SpacemanSpiff, Why are you block me[edit]

Why are you block me sir, Please give me Suitable reasons. ?Sanatani arya (talk|Sanatani arya|talk 21:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please check my edits & contribution. ?Sanatani arya (talk|Sanatani arya|talk 21:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any Administrator not be here.[edit]

Please reply me. Wikipedia Administration. Sanatani arya (talk|Sanatani arya|talk 05:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply me. SpacemanSpiff[edit]

You are misusing your rights. Please tell me the proper reason why you have blocked me, your utmost please, please tell. ??? Sanatani arya (talk|Sanatani arya|talk 05:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

सनातनी आर्य (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why are you block me sir, please give me Suitable reasons. ? =YouSanatani arya (talk|Sanatani arya|talk 06:04, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you already know, you are blocked for sock puppetry. PhilKnight (talk) 06:54, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why are you block me sir, Please give me Suitable reasons. ? Please check my edits & contribution. ? I,m not sockpupt. Sanatani arya (talk|Sanatani arya|talk 06:04, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]