User talk:みしまるもも/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Afraid to Die has been reverted.
Your edit here to Afraid to Die was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xv5jXE0Zt48) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, みしまるもも, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Japanese; did you know there is a Japanese Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts!

ようこそ!

みしまるももさん、はじめまして。英語版ウィキペディアへようこそ。英語版ウィキペディアへの投稿はいつでも歓迎いたしますが、残念ながら今回みしまるももさんに執筆いただいた英文は英語版ウィキペディアの水準を満たしておりません。もしよろしければ、日本語版ウィキペディアの方へ投稿していただければ幸いです。ウィキペディア･プロジェクトへの参加ありがとうございます。 -- Addbot (talk) 00:43, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Yukio Mishima‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. MarnetteD | Talk 15:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

English Wikipedia

Hello and thanks for you efforts. As to the nuances of seppuku in the case of Morita I can only point out to you that the English language biographies that describe the events of Nov 25, 1970 all point out that Morita was unsuccessful in his attempt to kill himself. While this might not meet the exact Japanese definition of failing in his suicide attempt it does meet the English one. The changes that you are making to the sentence will be confusing for English readers and to go into more detail will not make it any easier. I can only add to the previous suggestions that you either edit the Japanese Wiki or that you go very slowly here. Please be aware that we are all volunteers here thus edit summaries like this one [1] won't always get a good response as no one is required to clean up you entries. I am sorry as I know that understanding this this is not easy for you but please try to grasp the some of the difficulties that you are creating. Your help in this will be appreciated. MarnetteD | Talk 03:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

I have removed the claim that Morita "failed" to perform the ritual, because as you say it is very questionable. Consequently there is no longer any need to include details from the autopsy. Xanthoxyl ^< 08:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

English ability concerns

Hi. I'm sorry to have to write this, but after watching your edits to Yukio Mishima and other related articles over the past few days, I feel I must echo the comments written above about your limited English ability. Is there any reason why you feel the need to concentrate here rather than the Japanese Wikipedia where your language abilities are presumably more suited? As your English language ability is clearly very limited, I would strongly urge you to refrain from adding chunks of ungrammatical English to articles, which other editors then have to try and make sense of and clean up. I would particularly ask you to stop replacing perfectly good English with ungrammatical English. Please take heed, and be more aware of the problems you are causing here. --DAJF (talk) 07:20, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Your latest edit here indicates that you do not appear to understand the concerns of myself and other editors above. The problem is not with sourcing - it is with the way you replace perfectly understandable English with a mess. What do you think we should do? If you are unwilling to cooperate or show a basic level of competence, it might be necessary to report you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and request editing restrictions. --DAJF (talk) 07:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, DAJF, あなたは日本語が堪能だと書いていたので、日本語で書かせていただきます。ウィキペディア編集で一番大切なことは、事実や真実を記述することでしょう。英語の文法が拙いからといって正確な情報を記述する権利を奪うのはずいぶんと偏狭でおかしなことです。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.185.119.91 (talk) 04:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

January 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yukio Mishima bibliography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Som999 (talk) 05:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, みしまるもも. You have new messages at Som999's talk page.
Message added 12:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Som999 (talk) 12:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, みしまるもも. You have new messages at Som999's talk page.
Message added 13:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Som999 (talk) 13:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Decay of the Angel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shizuoka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yasuke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nanban. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, みしまるもも. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, みしまるもも. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, みしまるもも. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, みしまるもも. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

September 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Japanese occupation of the Dutch East Indies, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 14:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

The editing I am doing adds historical facts from evidence based on a neutral point of view. I think that such false labeling of me would be a blockage for me because of slander against me.--みしまるもも (talk) 23:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

See the warning I placed below. And if you want to make the case that I am slandering you, feel free to take it to WP:AN. Drmies (talk) 14:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring

Now you are edit warring. I take it you know what that means. You will need to use the talk page to get consensus for your disputed changes before you add them. --Merbabu (talk) 02:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Your recent editing history at Proclamation of Indonesian Independence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JarrahTree 03:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your information.（´＿｀＼）(/￣o(･_･;)b 　But I think it's unfair not to put the same message on Davidelit's page.(´･ω･`) --みしまるもも (talk) 03:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC) AHKS補足--みしまるもも (talk) 05:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

みしまるもも, you are this close to a block for disruption. You ask why the other editor wasn't warned--well, you are the one who is clearly editing against consensus, as expressed by the edits of other editors. In addition, you make outrageous claims like this here. Now, I see you have posted on two relevant talk pages, and that's good, but please consider this a final warning. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 14:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

はいはい。＠～(・ε・ )--みしまるもも (talk) 23:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yukio Mishima, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SCAP. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. Binksternet (talk) 14:56, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

My edit is not my personal analysis. It is Kent Gilbert's analysis about Comfort women, and to add his analysis into the "Controversies" section where there should be various views and controversies, is not violate Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. And, the forgery and lying of Seiji Yoshida and the Asahi Shinbun had been became public, the Asahi Shimbun has an apology press conference in 2014. In Japanese Wikipedia, about the comfort women articles (朝日新聞の慰安婦報道問題, 日本の慰安婦問題, 日本人戦争捕虜尋問レポート No.49) are composed of multifaceted controversies which properly reflect analytical opinions such as Kent Gilbert. Compared to that, the article of English Wikipedia is so lacking the knowledge and neutrality from the comprehensive perspective.--みしまるもも (talk) 02:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC) typo, etc.--みしまるもも (talk) 03:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Memo;

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Man'yōshū, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)