User talk:0999ad

This is 0999ad's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lord Leslie Francis Adams (March 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: reads like a hoax?

Theroadislong (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 0999ad! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lord Leslie Francis Adams

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Lord Leslie Francis Adams, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lord Leslie Francis Adams

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Lord Leslie Francis Adams, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:0999ad/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:0999ad/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but we really don't have the time or the electricity for this kind of BS. Drmies (talk) 17:19, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is me! written in a fanciful way and i am legally titled as Lord Leslie Francis Adams!

is there any need to comment with BS? 0999ad (talk) 17:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's really disappointing how things turned out.

I was merely looking for a bit of enjoyment, and now I find myself blocked and banned. It's unfortunate to see such a reaction, especially considering it seems to reflect a rather joyless existence, confined within the US.

I genuinely pity anyone who might have to encounter or engage with you moving forward. 0999ad (talk) 17:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is me! written in a fanciful way and i am legally titled as Lord Leslie Francis Adams!

is there any need to comment with BS?

It's really disappointing how things turned out.

I was merely looking for a bit of enjoyment, and now I find myself blocked and banned. It's unfortunate to see such a reaction, especially considering it seems to reflect a rather joyless existence, confined within the US.

I genuinely pity anyone who might have to encounter or engage with you moving forward.

0999ad (talk) 17:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 17:19, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is me! written in a fanciful way and i am legally titled as Lord Leslie Francis Adams!

is there any need to comment with BS? 0999ad (talk) 17:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply][reply]

It's really disappointing how things turned out.

I was merely looking for a bit of enjoyment, and now I find myself blocked and banned. It's unfortunate to see such a reaction, especially considering it seems to reflect a rather joyless existence, confined within the US.

I genuinely pity anyone who might have to encounter or engage with you moving forward.

0999ad (talk) 17:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not "confined within the US", and I'm the one who requested for your nonsense to be deleted.

I suggest you drop it now. If you keep going like this, you may also lose your editing privileges to this talk page. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]