Jump to content

User talk:0PV000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Estheticare moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Estheticare, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dewritech (talk) 17:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dewritech all the information on the page meet verifiability, because that's refereed with reliable, independent sources. All references are from the mainstream media of Pakistan. 0PV000 (talk) 03:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asif Saeed Sakhi

[edit]

Hello, 0PV000

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Asif Saeed Sakhi for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, 0PV000. Thank you for your work on Asif Saeed Sakhi. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

every mentioned source says that someone else won the election in that constituency

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

[edit]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:UA85 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UA85. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 21:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]