User talk:103.51.153.82

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sharman Joshi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 18:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

103.51.153.82 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Our IP has been blocked, I think some of user has misused it, kindly unblock IP and block user, which can help us to have edit access if we really have anything genuine to add content.

Decline reason:

If you don't really have anything genuine to add, there's no need to unblock. Huon (talk) 16:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Huon why we have blocked? what mis-behave has been done from our ip?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

103.51.153.82 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Kindly unblock the ip, also please explain valid reason to block.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

103.51.153.82 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi! Kindly unblock the ip as just bcoz some of user has asked one of user to review few pages in marathi wikipedia without reference is not mis-behaviour. I have seen that the same user Tiven2240 is wikipedia Temporary Administrator in Marathi and have Patroller rights in English wikipedia. He mentioned in reason to block one of our ip user 'Cinemawala' that to looks his editing pattern. Cinemawala has shown me 'Tiven2240's editing pattern as well he is constantly editing page 'Tu maza jeev', 'East Indian language' and 'kurla' and few pages. I herewith not want to complain or pinpoint anything, whole point is its not for any monetary thing or likewise, it may be user wish to add more authentic information for same article. I have no issues for Admnistators to block Cinemawala or any user in our ip but for such reasons blocking ip for unlimited time span with no account creation is not right. Since 90's world has become closer thorugh internet and Wikipedia is such worldwide big human effort and platform through which we may add genuine information for world to make them available such information our IP should be in working state. I herewith request you humbly and politely, kindly understand case and please give us chance to serve world the best what we have. We will take care further that no one from our IP will not able to misuse this platform or do anything wrong. Thanks in advance for kind co-operation.

Decline reason:

The majority of your appeal is incomprehensible, which does not bode well for competent contribution. Irrespective of the language skills, it is hardly surprising that a sock account that has been using this IP for several months professes to be unrelated once a hard block is applied. Bottom line: I don't believe that unblocking this IP will benefit Wikipedia and am declining the appeal. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2018[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DMacks (talk) 20:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

103.51.153.82 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This DMack have some mental block I guess I said it clear on his talk page about editing wikipedia to contribute authentic content, there are 1000 users who are just contributing on some religion on some specific pages, look alike taking monetary benefits and damn those are working as admin or some capacity. this all are crazy. you cant understand mentality anyways thanks for your useless foolish reason concern and block User:DMacks Understood your vision as well. lol 103.51.153.82 (talk) 05:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Attacking the blocking admin's mental state is not going to get this IP unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:21, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:103.51.153.82&oldid=858734881"