User talk:108.252.124.176

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (108.252.124.176) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! —Javert2113 (Let's chat!) 14:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Recent edit to Hobby[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hobby, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Mike1901 (talk) 21:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Just Say No has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Bradford Parkinson that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It is considered a personal attack to accuse another editor of sockpuppetry without providing any evidence. If you think there is socking then take the editor to WP:SPI. Either way do not make such claims in article edit summaries. Meters (talk) 22:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I removed the edit warring warning on Bradford Parkinson but you should still read WP:EW. Per WP:BRD you need to discuss this on the article's talk page once you are undone. And there is no need to add the identical content in two places. I will start the talk page discussion. Meters (talk) 23:12, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the information is useless and deserves to stay on the page. It is probably the second most useful piece of information on the page for Bradford. Second to him having invented GPS. There are plenty of Wikipedia pages that mention the names of family members. Ian Parkinson is in many ways indisputably controversial in San Luis Obispo County and one of my references suggests as much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.252.124.176 (talkcontribs) 00:19, May 19, 2018 (UTC)
Discuss article content on the article's talk page. Meters (talk) 07:05, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bradford Parkinson. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Restoring the edit warring warning since you restored your improperly sourced and controversial edit again, without participating in the talkpage discussion I started. Meters (talk) 06:56, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Bradford Parkinson. Don't remove dead links. Just tag them so that the bot will look for an archived copy. Don't remove links that are already tagged as dead. Links do not have to be online to be valid. A dead link still tells us where the information came from, which is needed. Replacing the dead link with a cn is not constructive. If you are going to move a link take the whole link, not just the bare URL, and remove the entire link from its original spot. Meters (talk) 19:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not remove the reference to his having attended Breck from the Personal life section. Yes, it is also mentioned in the Education section, but we also need to mention it in personal life because we are using it as the basis for the following line "Parkinson has credited his experiences at the Breck School for inspiring in him an early love of math and science, an interest which eventually became his life's calling." And stop removing information that is sourced to dead links. I've reported your IP for this last series of edits. Meters (talk) 19:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amuse good faith[edit]

Please note there is a distinction between vandalism and good-faith edits. The assumption of good faith towards other editors is a key guideline on Wikipedia, and so the describing of a logical-but-uninformed edit [1] as vandalism and reporting it for administer attention (Wikipedia:Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism should be noted) is treading on this line.--SamHolt6 (talk) 19:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DS notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Meters (talk) 05:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]