User talk:109.146.230.22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

109.146.230.22 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What why am I blocked I haven't done anything. I was just helping and getting answers to questions.

Decline reason:

A transparent lie. Block extended, talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

YAMLA maybe this user is not lieing maybe it's true. Maybe people are getting the wrong side of him/her. Please give them a chance to explain. That's a bit harsh for block extension and TPA Revoked. I help with Unicorns (talk) 13:08, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's a pretty good statement for someone who just showed up yesterday. Oh, hey in case you hadn't noticed both of you have your caplock on :P - FlightTime (open channel) 13:12, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/109.146.230.22, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jasper Deng (talk) 22:27, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]