User talk:109.175.155.98

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ian Thomson, you may be blocked from editing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:50, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CLCStudent (talk) 12:57, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello, I'm MPants at work. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Self-referential humor have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 17:28, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 17:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

@Materialscientist: I have at no point violated 3RR. I know that's not a necessary condition for edit warring, but if edit warring on the page Self-referential humor is the immediate reason for the block, then why have you spared MPants, a perpetually troublesome editor who has made the exact same edit to that article no fewer than 5 times in the last 3 weeks? 109.175.155.98 (talk) 08:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

@Materialscientist: Why do you also consistently fail to respond to reasonable requests to justify your administrative actions, in defiance of WP:ADMINACCT? 109.175.155.98 (talk) 13:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

---