User talk:110.175.251.234

June 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ryszard Linkiewicz. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 21:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ben Phillips (youtuber). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Redalert2fan (talk) 11:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.175.251.234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have learned my lesson from vandalising and won't continue this anymore. I will make useful edits which I agree to do. Please shorten the block

Decline reason:

This is a CheckUser block, which means this IP has been used for block evasion and/or account sockpuppetry - and the block is likely to be extended every time it is misused in that way. If you have an account, please use that if you want to request an unblock. If you don't have an account, you'll have to wait out the block with no block evasion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

By continuing to make IP unblock requests here you are continuing to evade your block, so I have removed your latest request and have revoked talk page access for the duration of the block. If you wish to request unblock, you need to log in to your account and request it from there (and if you have, for example, five accounts, you should make your request from the oldest). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.175.251.234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not vandalise after the block has expired and I am innocent, I do not know why I am accused of abusive use when this is simple false that I have used this IP address abusively, I am sick of being blocked and I am a legitimate user so therefore please unblock me

Decline reason:

Make an unblock request from your account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My accounts are blocked forever — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.33.109.220 (talk) 04:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.175.251.234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay I got it, I have edited in a abusive manner which is the reason for a block, I didnt know that I edited abusively, I plan to edit articles about biographies and aviation. I didn't even know that edited in a abusive manner, if I did know I wouldn't have done that. I am tired of the block, such as being reblocked, please lift the block

Decline reason:

Unblock requests will not be considered here - you must make your request from your original account. —DoRD (talk) 04:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pinging Bbb23 and Boing! said Zebedee for context -- Luk ^talk 00:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.175.251.234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I already have been autoblocked by Jpgordon more than once

Decline reason:

You have already been told to make your request from your original account. If you cannot do that for any reason, user WP:UTRS. Talk page access for this address revoked to prevent you wasting any more of our time. O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 07:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Update to above - the block on this account has expired. However if you continue to use this address for abuse, it will be re-imposed. O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 07:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are autoblocks set by administrator or automatic? 110.175.251.234

February 2019[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Duncan (surname); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -INeedSupport- ^:3 04:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.175.251.234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was warned about a block for disruptive editing, but Materialscientist blocked me when I didn't disregard the message that has been sent to me by INeedSupport

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.175.251.234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Oh okay, I still did make disruptive edits but I did not know that persistent undoing of edits that countinue to be removed because they are uncostructive is edit warring. I have been blocked due to disruptive editing, IMO 6 months of the block is too long and should be shorter than that because I promise and agree not to edit in a disruptive manner or make damages and make useful contributions and would edit articles about aviation, transport, technology and biographies if unblocked

Decline reason:

Given the long history of abuse, 6 months is much too short in my opinion, given the history of abuse here. Yamla (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.175.251.234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What long history of abuse are you talking about Yamla, I disagree with you. I seriously think that I abused on Wikipedia less times than you said. Blocks suck, they are annoying and waste of editing ability time. Do you think that Materialscientist is right to do that despite the fact that I did not disregard the the instruction given by INeedSupport?

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request, and I am revoking your talk page access here to prevent further misuse of the unblock template. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:40, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The long history of abuse is reflected in the block log available here. Additionally, it looks like you have an account. What is your account? --Yamla (talk) 12:28, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, there's no doubt here. I have extended your block to one year and noted that you are still violating WP:EVADE. Until your original account is unblocked, you are not welcome here. --Yamla (talk) 13:25, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.