User talk:115.64.55.137

Welcome![edit]

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — MarkH₂₁^talk 19:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Your recent editing history at Culture of Vietnam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This is a courtesy notice because you have undone several edits. — MarkH₂₁^talk 19:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop abusing your academic and Wikipedia privileges and let me edit this page properly in peace. I am Vietnamese and it is my right to provide an accurate representation that isn't Eurocentric, Sinocentric, or otherwise. 115.64.55.137 (talk) 20:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn’t matter who you are. You cannot revert more than three times. You also cannot WP:EDITORIALIZE / insert material not in the cited sources. These are basic Wikipedia policies. — MarkH₂₁^talk 20:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one reverting my edits. You are the one bullying me. It is true that the Yue people conflicted with the Wu people. I was about to add references but you deleted all of my painful hard work. 115.64.55.137 (talk) 20:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The burden is on you to add references when you add material, see the policy at WP:CHALLENGE. You have also continued to push your edits through, including your resection game of material about tattoos and social stratification under the label "Hairstyles" and adding "However" to imply a relationship where none exists in the original cited reference here. That is against the policy against synthesis and the guideline against editorializing. — MarkH₂₁^talk 20:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I agree that I made errors there. I see now that the entire section has been entirely revamped though. I am happy with how it is now, instead of the insanely racist accusations the previous information had. 115.64.55.137 (talk) 18:13, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.